@Default4
.
Activity of questionable value and taking ample time to produce good content are two different things. The purpose of my "server" is different by nature... not to mention the fact that I never called out whatever server y'all are up to--you're demonstrating ample incapacity in knowing the difference between a generalized statement and an attack on anyone, as you now for whatever reason resort to zero-sum messaging against an uninterested party.
.
Banding together to try so hard to defend your status doesn't look good on you all either! Try something new. As I said, something of value will have a natural demand to it. This is a general statement on absolutely anything. If I really wanted to call your server or whatever out, I could do that, if you really want me to.
@asteroidbook345
.
Yeah, gonna do all the styling for it so it looks like your average $5 calculator. This was just barebones label and buttons in a single block.
@PlaneFlightX
.
Strangely enough a lot of people don't seem to be knowledgeable on inverse trig nomenclature. Arc or a notation is about as common as inverse notation in my experience, so that's very strange to me.
I'm guessing coordinate based with differently painted fuselage pieces cycling over each other. Nothing too complicated but probably painful to get all the data required.
@Zue5s
.
There exists no generalized expression to perform the task you requested. Controlling an aircraft by wire is an extremely difficult task even in SP, and requires full knowledge of the characteristics of the aircraft you want to put it on because parameters are incredibly specific.
If it's relevant to you you'd know it already, but it's a new way for Funky Trees expressions to be represented and stored.
+1Bad code, you failure
+2The second variable menu is not the same menu as the bottom bar variable menu. They do different things.
+1pepega
+1@WiiMini
.
Did you know cinema popcorn has one of the highest markups of any product out there?
@WiiMini
.
🍿
That'll be $7.99, thank you.
@WiiMini
.
If you mean popcorn, yes. Although I am not the biggest fan of corn.
Oh dear, more popcorn time. Will not bother any further.
@Default4
+17.
Activity of questionable value and taking ample time to produce good content are two different things. The purpose of my "server" is different by nature... not to mention the fact that I never called out whatever server y'all are up to--you're demonstrating ample incapacity in knowing the difference between a generalized statement and an attack on anyone, as you now for whatever reason resort to zero-sum messaging against an uninterested party.
.
Banding together to try so hard to defend your status doesn't look good on you all either! Try something new. As I said, something of value will have a natural demand to it. This is a general statement on absolutely anything. If I really wanted to call your server or whatever out, I could do that, if you really want me to.
@WiiMini
+16.
If your server has any real value people will flock to it automatically.
@Leahh
.
@asteroidbook345
.
Yeah, gonna do all the styling for it so it looks like your average $5 calculator. This was just barebones label and buttons in a single block.
You should be able to make them pretty easily though. Uh, the new features have expanded ordnance options substantially...
funky & tree
+10@wheatfield90
.
Continuous interactionType is broken and the devs are aware of this issue. Will be fixed next patch. Once is still functional.
@BaconAircraft
.
Camera data... HMDs?
Absolutely game changing. I can't stress enough.
+1Probably the most game-changing update.
+1Lol, never ended up releasing it...
Probably the first application of FT.
+1@PlaneFlightX
+3.
Strangely enough a lot of people don't seem to be knowledgeable on inverse trig nomenclature. Arc or a notation is about as common as inverse notation in my experience, so that's very strange to me.
@PlaneFlightX
+1.
I can't make any promises, but at least not long after 1.11 is out of beta. A lil' busy with schoolwork.
I suppose a pixel decal part might be possible to natively support, then? Either way it indeed is terrifying.
+5@rexzion
.
Psuedo-AGs? Yes. Of course, you can't activate said psuedo-AGs outside of your cockpit, but you can do them.
@rexzion
+3.
You should be able to do pretty much anything from your cockpit/GUI.
Time to make a computer.
+6@Shirakami56709
.
Cope
@AWESOMENESS360
.
disconnectOnlyiircI might be wrong. I know
Nonemakes them invulnerable but I forgot the other.He's alive
zum zum
+1@Sosig1
+1.
Feel free.
I'm guessing coordinate based with differently painted fuselage pieces cycling over each other. Nothing too complicated but probably painful to get all the data required.
+9CoolPeach has it right, the devs have said already that they are planning to add more variable write out.
+1@tomlin5412
.
Just a note: SP (Unity) uses 9.81 flat.
Documentation
+1F9...
+3Variables. Dear god
+6@Zue5s
+2.
There exists no generalized expression to perform the task you requested. Controlling an aircraft by wire is an extremely difficult task even in SP, and requires full knowledge of the characteristics of the aircraft you want to put it on because parameters are incredibly specific.
Smoothed outputs or something like a stepped function to simulate torque reduction effects.
@jacephysicsboss @EverettStormy
.
Check this...
How does quantum physics apply here????
Epic!
+1Surprised you got it to spin fast enough.
+2@TDevil36
.
No, I did not expect it to get as much traction as it did! Still in disbelief that it's the best of the year.
Tfw it's submerged
@uselessuser151
.
You need a variable-rate smooth function.
@BogdanX
+3.
I don't think you need pistons to do it though
@Skykid028
.
Jesus christ we just got MFDs
+7bruhhh
+6E.
+4