there are some things that you missed and is wrong about:
1. you forgot the fact that the Gripen is easy to maintain, and it has STOL capabilities. It can also supermaneuver.
2. you forgot the fact that both the F-16 and F/A-18 can carry alot of weapons, and an AMRAAM, which is ridiculously powerful.
3. The Su-30SM is a specialized version of the Su-30MKI specifically for the Russian Air Force.
4. No, assuming it's not the MiG-29OVT, the MiG-29 does NOT have a thrust vectoring.
As for my vote, I'd like the Philippines to choose either the Viper, or the Gripen.
These are reasons I choose the two out of all of them:
- The Viper is 80% better than the F/A-18.
- The Su-30MKI, while it is very good, it is very expensive.
- Lack of range on the MiG-29.
- Lack of thrust/weight of the F/A-18.
- Gripen's easy to maintain status.
- Viper's bubble canopy.
- Gripen's capability. Including STOL, supermaneuver, and the loadout capability.
- Viper's capability. Including high T/W ratio, HOBS, and loadout capability.
I honestly never really looked at her that much
not many things did stuck out from her builds that made me go "wow, this is amazing" and to be brutally honest, I don't think she is the pinnacle of SimplePlanes.
as much as people think highly of others or themselves, you can never really truly call someone "a pinnacle of [thing]". Not that I'm trying to hate on LunarEclipse, I think she's good at making some stuff, but to me she's just another builder like me trying her best. Not much users did stuck out to me either, not because I think I'm good (which I'd say eh, Ig? not really) but because those who did stuck out to me, I consider them more as a friend than as a stranger.
anyway this comment was just here so I can say she definitely is not the pinnacle of simpleplanes
to clear up things:
playing the game and being on the site is 2 different things.
yes, the game is rated for 4+ years old, but the site isn't.
you have to be 13 to be making an account on the site and interacting with the community, not to play the game.
nop, tires are not braking by default (though I wish there was an option to activate that in game, aside from using a switch that has the input of "Brake")
try using overload and putting the value of "brakeTorque" to 0
I don't get the whole point of this drink, it kills people apparently?
eh might as well try it out just to see if it's real or not He was never to be heard again.
if you're aiming for that upvote points, just don't
you're essentially going to be losing what potential you have in you, by limiting the fact that you just want upvotes
people with an aim of getting upvotes usually when they don't get enough upvotes, they'll try to cope and seethe by complaining about why does this other dude seem to do better when he has practically the same quality build as you do
and soon enough, they'll lose motivation and interest in building because they won't get enough stupid internet points, and essentially be depressed
so my advice, just don't
as Korzalerke said, you'll enjoy the game more because you enjoy building, pushing yourself to the limit instead of... whatever you're trying to do with those stupid and useless internet points
honestly not much
mods on mobile couldn't support as much "power" as mods on PC/Steam, because it's a much weaker device
yes, some custom maps would be able to be installed and used on mobile, but even maps could be too much for mobile devices
I'm glad that I wasn't the only one hoping for a Fox 2.
Added Suggestion(s):
The ability to be rear aspect or all aspect. Rear aspect will always target the enemy's engines' position.
The ability to be completely invisible to the HUD and the Radar. Kinda like how the missile works right now, but it doesn't make any warning tones.
Missile reworks:
Opinion:
Personally, I feel like it doesn't need that much of a rework. The XML editing is already quite simple enough. If anything, I just want a little behaviour tweak.
Added Suggestion(s):
TWS Mode for Fox 3s.
Limited fuel, would still track after running out.
Laser guided weaponry.
Proxy Detonation as default for AtA missiles.
RWR:
Opinion:
RWR is a great suggestion, if I'm being honest. Generally increase situational awareness.
Added Suggestion(s):
Able to track a missile's position.
Radar part:
Opinion:
Radar increases the immersion of the game. Even a simple radar like the Ace Combat style Radar would be very nice. Problem with Radar displays with text is that the targets needs to be selected first, then you can see where they are.
Added Suggestion(s):
None.
HUD:
Opinion:
We kinda don't need a separate part for HUD. PlanariaLab already made a working 1 part HUD. But when you really think about it, the non-ft users will have a hard time navigating the HUD, let alone editing it.
Added Suggestion(s):
None.
Misc:
Hollow Nose Cone:
Opinion:
Would be nice if the nose cone doesn't act like the way it is... I think they should redo the Rise and Run model for the nose cone first. It looks weird.
Fuselage Wings:
Opinion:
No objections, I fully agree with this.
Sound Redesign:
Opinion:
Yes please!
Added Suggestion(s):
Sonic Booms. It gets kinda boring when you hear a missile/aircraft fly by at Mach 1 and all you hear is the rocket booster/jet engine noise for 0.4 seconds.
UI changes:
Opinion:
The UI is as good as it is, to be honest. I don't feel the need to change it.
New locations:
Opinion:
Yes please! It feels as if there's 0% activities on these islands.
yeagh, sr2 community is pretty small
might consider joining sr2 just to make planes
I have enough to buy one from the store, dunno when am I going to buy it though
no. It's a feature since 1.9.
Read the 1.9 patch notes.
And by since 1.9, I mean since like a week or 2 ago. Because since 1.9, android mod support is disabled.
Now, I know what you're thinking. Why? Because they had no options, blame Google, not Jundroo.
For the An-225, There is still some hope of it being revived.
For the Ukraine-Russia war thing, I really hope it doesn't get worse and escalate to WWIII.
Ok, this is quite interesting.
Time for your first requested aircraft program.
I'll call the program: "Advanced LightWeight Fighter", or "ALWF" program.
Just as the name stated, make a lightweight fighter. The program must have advanced avionics, weaponry, thrust vector engine, and stealth (optional).
Good luck!
I honestly don't mind about this too much
What I mind about though is the duration of the fire, it's short as hell and it's less satisfying, there's like no feeling to "Goddamn, that burned alot of fuel", and there's this sense to it that it has an automatic fire extinguisher, which is just kind of a bs tbh
It's fine on airline engines, but not like every other parts
Honestly, I agree with @BeastHunter. Why waste your account just because your phone broke? Besides, phones are replaceable anyway, unlike your life. Your progress are lost? Learn from mistakes, back up your creation next time. Don't take regrets first, take the lessons first.
There are 3 ways of doing this, from hard, to easy.
1. Let's start with the Hardest. Delete all high performance cost parts carefully. Do not delete the important ones (excluding texts). You can see how much a part costs in the aircraft info ("i" button on the designer menu).
2. This next one is medium. If you're pretty rich, this should be no problem. But I'd like to think otherwise. Get a much better device. Aircrafts will cause more lag the more parts it has due to all the calculations.
3. This is the easiest way. Tune all of your graphics down to the lowest available graphics. especially physics. Higher physics will cause more lag due to again, calculations.
If option 1 and option 3 didn't work, and you're too poor to get a new device, I suggest not flying it.
This is good, but not good enough.
In order to make an aircraft Supermaneuverable at least in SP is get an all moving elevator that can deflect to maybe 30°, and put the CoM slightly infront of the CoL. Get slow, and you should be able to do it. Although this has one problem. Stability. It's going to be super unstable, so I recommend making a simple, yet effective G-limiter. It's actually pretty simple. If you want it to have a maximum deflection angle of 30°, get 2 rotators, put the first rotator on 15°, same goes for the second, but put it on an activation group. Put them together, and boom, done.
Thrust vector has a goal of making the aircraft generally more stable and agile. Common user of the thrust vectoringtechnology is Russia with it's Su-27 successors and it's Su-57. It's also used by the F-22 Raptor and Harrier jets.
There are 3 types of thrust vectoring. VTOL, 2D, and 3D.
VTOL TVCs are Thrust Vectoring that are used by VTOL aircrafts, like the Harrier, and the F-35. This kind of thrust vectoring allows an aircraft to do what's knows as VIFF.
2D TVC are thrust vectoring that can move vertically. Usually the inputs for these thrust vectoring are Roll and Pitch. Such aircraft featuring 2D TVC is Su-37, F-15S/MTD, and the F-22 (note that the F-22 only has pitch for it's TVC input).
3D TVC is a thrust vectoring that can move both vertically and horizontally. Meaning that it can move in all directions (roll, yaw, and pitch). Such aircraft featuring 3D TVC are Su-35S, Su-57, and Su-30SM.
To learn more about TVC, click here
I enjoyed making em.
I would make them again just because of the fact I can make them my target practice
they're also really easy to pump out, the only problem being that it's hard to adjust the flight model with such limitation
it seems that my comment has been accidentally deleted (and that's understandable, it's a hassle to delete comments one by one) so I'm just gonna recomment
good shit.
silver haired character designs are peak (opinion, feel free to disagree)
there are some things that you missed and is wrong about:
1. you forgot the fact that the Gripen is easy to maintain, and it has STOL capabilities. It can also supermaneuver.
2. you forgot the fact that both the F-16 and F/A-18 can carry alot of weapons, and an AMRAAM, which is ridiculously powerful.
3. The Su-30SM is a specialized version of the Su-30MKI specifically for the Russian Air Force.
4. No, assuming it's not the MiG-29OVT, the MiG-29 does NOT have a thrust vectoring.
As for my vote, I'd like the Philippines to choose either the Viper, or the Gripen.
+5These are reasons I choose the two out of all of them:
- The Viper is 80% better than the F/A-18.
- The Su-30MKI, while it is very good, it is very expensive.
- Lack of range on the MiG-29.
- Lack of thrust/weight of the F/A-18.
- Gripen's easy to maintain status.
- Viper's bubble canopy.
- Gripen's capability. Including STOL, supermaneuver, and the loadout capability.
- Viper's capability. Including high T/W ratio, HOBS, and loadout capability.
I honestly never really looked at her that much
+4not many things did stuck out from her builds that made me go "wow, this is amazing" and to be brutally honest, I don't think she is the pinnacle of SimplePlanes.
as much as people think highly of others or themselves, you can never really truly call someone "a pinnacle of [thing]". Not that I'm trying to hate on LunarEclipse, I think she's good at making some stuff, but to me she's just another builder like me trying her best. Not much users did stuck out to me either, not because I think I'm good (which I'd say eh, Ig? not really) but because those who did stuck out to me, I consider them more as a friend than as a stranger.
anyway this comment was just here so I can say she definitely is not the pinnacle of simpleplanes
woe
+4might steal it.to clear up things:
+4playing the game and being on the site is 2 different things.
yes, the game is rated for 4+ years old, but the site isn't.
you have to be 13 to be making an account on the site and interacting with the community, not to play the game.
go to xml, buttons, and add:
+4interactionType | Togglethere.
shut up
+4Idk why I'm telling you to shut up but fr
chill myguy
I see Eagle.
+4I updood.
I see we have one thing in common :D
nop, tires are not braking by default (though I wish there was an option to activate that in game, aside from using a switch that has the input of "Brake")
+4try using overload and putting the value of "brakeTorque" to 0
oh no
+4looks like @DeezDucks has dissapeared due to his ill intent of leaking classified documents
I don't get the whole point of this drink, it kills people apparently?
+4eh might as well try it out just to see if it's real or not
He was never to be heard again.
absolutely no fucking way
+4felon
+4bottom text.
babe wake up
+4reinmcdeer just posted a teaser
cringe.
+4if you're aiming for that upvote points, just don't
+4you're essentially going to be losing what potential you have in you, by limiting the fact that you just want upvotes
people with an aim of getting upvotes usually when they don't get enough upvotes, they'll try to cope and seethe by complaining about why does this other dude seem to do better when he has practically the same quality build as you do
and soon enough, they'll lose motivation and interest in building because they won't get enough stupid internet points, and essentially be depressed
so my advice, just don't
as Korzalerke said, you'll enjoy the game more because you enjoy building, pushing yourself to the limit instead of... whatever you're trying to do with those stupid and useless internet points
ahem.
+4"If you are continually telling people their airplanes suck, then maybe you suck."
- SimplePlanes Rule: Be Kind, #2.
honestly not much
+4mods on mobile couldn't support as much "power" as mods on PC/Steam, because it's a much weaker device
yes, some custom maps would be able to be installed and used on mobile, but even maps could be too much for mobile devices
figuring out ft
+4pain
Added suggestion and opinions personally from me:
- Avionics:
- IR Missile:
- Opinion:
- Added Suggestion(s):
- The ability to be rear aspect or all aspect. Rear aspect will always target the enemy's engines' position.
- The ability to be completely invisible to the HUD and the Radar. Kinda like how the missile works right now, but it doesn't make any warning tones.
- Missile reworks:
- Opinion:
- Added Suggestion(s):
- TWS Mode for Fox 3s.
- Limited fuel, would still track after running out.
- Laser guided weaponry.
- Proxy Detonation as default for AtA missiles.
- RWR:
- Opinion:
- Added Suggestion(s):
- Able to track a missile's position.
- Radar part:
- Opinion:
- Added Suggestion(s):
- Opinion:
- Added Suggestion(s):
- Hollow Nose Cone:
- Opinion:
- Fuselage Wings:
- Opinion:
- Sound Redesign:
- Opinion:
- Added Suggestion(s):
- Sonic Booms. It gets kinda boring when you hear a missile/aircraft fly by at Mach 1 and all you hear is the rocket booster/jet engine noise for 0.4 seconds.
- UI changes:
- Opinion:
- New locations:
- Opinion:
+4I'm glad that I wasn't the only one hoping for a Fox 2.
Personally, I feel like it doesn't need that much of a rework. The XML editing is already quite simple enough. If anything, I just want a little behaviour tweak.
RWR is a great suggestion, if I'm being honest. Generally increase situational awareness.
Radar increases the immersion of the game. Even a simple radar like the Ace Combat style Radar would be very nice. Problem with Radar displays with text is that the targets needs to be selected first, then you can see where they are.
None.
HUD:
We kinda don't need a separate part for HUD. PlanariaLab already made a working 1 part HUD. But when you really think about it, the non-ft users will have a hard time navigating the HUD, let alone editing it.
None.
Misc:
Would be nice if the nose cone doesn't act like the way it is... I think they should redo the Rise and Run model for the nose cone first. It looks weird.
No objections, I fully agree with this.
Yes please!
The UI is as good as it is, to be honest. I don't feel the need to change it.
Yes please! It feels as if there's 0% activities on these islands.
dayyummm
+4updooot
yeagh, sr2 community is pretty small
+4might consider joining sr2 just to make planes
I have enough to buy one from the store, dunno when am I going to buy it though
Never.
+4ok but fr is this a joke or na?
laughs in the fact that there is only one Су-47 Беркут ever produced
+4great effort nonetheless
I mean... It's SP, what do you think people gonna do? Not reverse engineer this thing? No way in hell.
+4more often than not, you kinda have to figure it out yourselves
because in this website, there are either:
though, this might help, and this
+4yep and ngl I also want sr2
+4no. It's a feature since 1.9.
+4Read the 1.9 patch notes.
And by since 1.9, I mean since like a week or 2 ago. Because since 1.9, android mod support is disabled.
Now, I know what you're thinking. Why? Because they had no options, blame Google, not Jundroo.
Very interesting question.
+4You really can't.
"This ain't Ace Combat, kid!"
@JustLookingForFriends
+4ok the mach 2.8 kinda does point that he wants a MiG, and @ValkyrieXB71, I suggest you change that to mach 1.6
definition of 144p
+4For the An-225, There is still some hope of it being revived.
+4For the Ukraine-Russia war thing, I really hope it doesn't get worse and escalate to WWIII.
congrats! You've received an upgrade: Gun!
+4Now you will earn crops 8x more!
Because... It has gone too far?
+4Honestly, they have the rights and I don't really care about it.
Ok, this is quite interesting.
+4Time for your first requested aircraft program.
I'll call the program: "Advanced LightWeight Fighter", or "ALWF" program.
Just as the name stated, make a lightweight fighter. The program must have advanced avionics, weaponry, thrust vector engine, and stealth (optional).
Good luck!
Happy Birthday!
And what better way to celebrate a Birthday other than running from the mods.
Now go run or the mods will Zandatsu your ass
+4I honestly don't mind about this too much
+4What I mind about though is the duration of the fire, it's short as hell and it's less satisfying, there's like no feeling to "Goddamn, that burned alot of fuel", and there's this sense to it that it has an automatic fire extinguisher, which is just kind of a bs tbh
It's fine on airline engines, but not like every other parts
What?
+4Also can you please make a mobile version of this?
@117Destroyerz
+4Then again, they could just make one themselves.
Pfft.
+4Yeah, like your life.
Honestly, I agree with @BeastHunter. Why waste your account just because your phone broke? Besides, phones are replaceable anyway, unlike your life. Your progress are lost? Learn from mistakes, back up your creation next time. Don't take regrets first, take the lessons first.
+4There are 3 ways of doing this, from hard, to easy.
1. Let's start with the Hardest. Delete all high performance cost parts carefully. Do not delete the important ones (excluding texts). You can see how much a part costs in the aircraft info ("i" button on the designer menu).
2. This next one is medium. If you're pretty rich, this should be no problem. But I'd like to think otherwise. Get a much better device. Aircrafts will cause more lag the more parts it has due to all the calculations.
3. This is the easiest way. Tune all of your graphics down to the lowest available graphics. especially physics. Higher physics will cause more lag due to again, calculations.
If option 1 and option 3 didn't work, and you're too poor to get a new device, I suggest not flying it.
+4This is good, but not good enough.
+4In order to make an aircraft Supermaneuverable at least in SP is get an all moving elevator that can deflect to maybe 30°, and put the CoM slightly infront of the CoL. Get slow, and you should be able to do it. Although this has one problem. Stability. It's going to be super unstable, so I recommend making a simple, yet effective G-limiter. It's actually pretty simple. If you want it to have a maximum deflection angle of 30°, get 2 rotators, put the first rotator on 15°, same goes for the second, but put it on an activation group. Put them together, and boom, done.
Thrust vector has a goal of making the aircraft generally more stable and agile. Common user of the thrust vectoringtechnology is Russia with it's Su-27 successors and it's Su-57. It's also used by the F-22 Raptor and Harrier jets.
There are 3 types of thrust vectoring. VTOL, 2D, and 3D.
VTOL TVCs are Thrust Vectoring that are used by VTOL aircrafts, like the Harrier, and the F-35. This kind of thrust vectoring allows an aircraft to do what's knows as VIFF.
2D TVC are thrust vectoring that can move vertically. Usually the inputs for these thrust vectoring are Roll and Pitch. Such aircraft featuring 2D TVC is Su-37, F-15S/MTD, and the F-22 (note that the F-22 only has pitch for it's TVC input).
3D TVC is a thrust vectoring that can move both vertically and horizontally. Meaning that it can move in all directions (roll, yaw, and pitch). Such aircraft featuring 3D TVC are Su-35S, Su-57, and Su-30SM.
To learn more about TVC, click here
I enjoyed making em.
+3I would make them again just because of the fact I can make them my target practice
they're also really easy to pump out, the only problem being that it's hard to adjust the flight model with such limitation
it seems that my comment has been accidentally deleted (and that's understandable, it's a hassle to delete comments one by one) so I'm just gonna recomment
+3good shit.
silver haired character designs are peak (opinion, feel free to disagree)
never was that person
+3lmfao
@Rjenteissussy
+3@Zhixunlin23
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@DatFiat126Fan19
+3@SuperSuperTheSylph
@Lem113
cleanest low part morgan I've ever seen
+3good fuckin job
abso fucking lutely
+33 words
+3do it yourself