technically all aircraft is AI capable.
but the issue widens if you want the AI aircraft to spawn automatically
generally, it is easier for AI aircrafts to fly with some form of control surface stabilization, because the AI model is too simplistic to be performing any advanced maneuvers.
to make an aircraft auto-spawnable, the aircraft needs to have specifically <96 parts, and <7 wing parts (this includes structural panels). If otherwise, the aircraft won't spawn.
bold of you to assume the F-14 is an easy to use dogfighter that can kick anyone's asses it's main mission isn't even to dogfight things
anyway for me it's the F-15EX not because for it's name but because of it's ingenuity
@Ashdenpaw1
it does matter
not by a lot, but it does matter.
as I always say when I describe upvote points, I think of it as a review system.
high upvote count means a build is considered a good one, something people should look out for.
while a high point user is one you should also expect to have good reputation for making good builds.
And to the people saying skill issue, can you not think of one intelligent thing to say?
not at that moment, cause I'm gonna be brutally honest, it's a fact.
but ok, here, what are you having problems with? connections not connecting? probably because it isn't a valid connection to begin with.
connection points have to be very specifically put onto another connection point for it to actually connect both parts, so maybe the issue you're having is you're not aligning both side of the connection point correctly, preventing it from connecting to one another.
alot of parts are like this, but some aren't, like fuselage parts. Though it's displayed that they only have 7-8 connection points, they have a lot of connection points that isn't visible, making it virtually connectable on almost every side. I say almost because there are very specific sides that it won't connect to. Not that I know where. But most often, if it's visually touching, it can most likely connect.
for other parts, you're only going to really have 1-2 connection points in average, so you can't be as free as using fuselages. This is because the devs ever rarely update a part, and also it's much simpler and easier to understand to have a single connection point than double, or triple the amount.
my honest tip? treat simpleplanes' building system like minecraft's, but slightly more complicated. Don't be afraid to mod your parts, don't be afraid to nudge 'em.
that's about it, Ig.
@Pakkoyan
apparently he's accusing of mods "hacking" his builds too
I'm gonna be honest with ya, does that make sense to your ears? cause it certainly didn't for me.
as have been discussed multiple times before, mod support from v1.9 onward will only be for PC, and is discontinued with mobile
though some mods are available, they are extremely difficult to find across the site, since mod support for android is generally discontinued
as for the reason, I don't exactly understand why, but it has something to do about google being incompatible with sp android's game engine.
as for iOS, your luck was out the moment you start playing on apple devices, because apple policies made it extremely difficult to make mods compatible, I believe.
@CrestelAeronautics @TheUltimatePlaneLover
As much doubtful the Su-57's stealth is, I suggest for you to not disrespect the Su-57.
As one say, if you let your guard down just because of a rumor, you could pay for it with your life.
Also I like the Su-57.
I honestly could not care more about ads
I don't have all day to watch ads so, I just often turn my brain off whenever I see an ad. Just like how the AIM-9M turns off it's seeker whenever it senses a flare
the fact that when I scroll down to upvote this and I see Andrew's username on the upvote list blows my mind
anyway ngl it looks kinda like a goofi j10
there's a "recently" added flight data xml that they added
by recently I mean like more than a year ago
which is TargetLocking and TargetLocked
you can use these, and be sure to clamp01 it
I agree on heat seeking missiles, another thing I'd like to add is the rear or all aspect capability, it would be so awesome
I'm a bit 50/50 on the rocket pods since you can just make them yourself, albeit with great effort
low drag bombs already exist (boom 50), what we truly need is a high drag bomb
you can basically take the boom 25 and rescale it to make an FAB-500 since there's not much different and you can always make custom bombs anyway
kind of agree but then again you can always make a custom model of it yourself
why don't we just rescale, edit the mass and the explosion scale to make a bigger bomb, is that too much task?
you can basically make smart bombs already, we don't really need a new weapon for it
insane attention begging
+2you're getting what you want now, you happy?
technically all aircraft is AI capable.
+2but the issue widens if you want the AI aircraft to spawn automatically
generally, it is easier for AI aircrafts to fly with some form of control surface stabilization, because the AI model is too simplistic to be performing any advanced maneuvers.
to make an aircraft auto-spawnable, the aircraft needs to have specifically <96 parts, and <7 wing parts (this includes structural panels). If otherwise, the aircraft won't spawn.
here comes the LCA hype train
+2bold of you to assume the F-14 is an easy to use dogfighter that can kick anyone's asses
+2it's main mission isn't even to dogfight things
anyway for me it's the F-15EX not because for it's name but because of it's ingenuity
@Ashdenpaw1
+2it does matter
not by a lot, but it does matter.
as I always say when I describe upvote points, I think of it as a review system.
high upvote count means a build is considered a good one, something people should look out for.
while a high point user is one you should also expect to have good reputation for making good builds.
w-
+2why does that matter? is it just something you're interested in or...?
holy fuck I thought that background was fake at first
+2yeah it is somewhat very simple, that is seriously impressive
Miosha? lore wise, yes. I would lose.
+2real wise? I don't wanna dare to fight her (I'd die from emotional damage)
not at that moment, cause I'm gonna be brutally honest, it's a fact.
+2but ok, here, what are you having problems with? connections not connecting? probably because it isn't a valid connection to begin with.
connection points have to be very specifically put onto another connection point for it to actually connect both parts, so maybe the issue you're having is you're not aligning both side of the connection point correctly, preventing it from connecting to one another.
alot of parts are like this, but some aren't, like fuselage parts. Though it's displayed that they only have 7-8 connection points, they have a lot of connection points that isn't visible, making it virtually connectable on almost every side. I say almost because there are very specific sides that it won't connect to. Not that I know where. But most often, if it's visually touching, it can most likely connect.
for other parts, you're only going to really have 1-2 connection points in average, so you can't be as free as using fuselages. This is because the devs ever rarely update a part, and also it's much simpler and easier to understand to have a single connection point than double, or triple the amount.
my honest tip? treat simpleplanes' building system like minecraft's, but slightly more complicated. Don't be afraid to mod your parts, don't be afraid to nudge 'em.
that's about it, Ig.
@Pakkoyan
+2apparently he's accusing of mods "hacking" his builds too
I'm gonna be honest with ya, does that make sense to your ears? cause it certainly didn't for me.
as have been discussed multiple times before, mod support from v1.9 onward will only be for PC, and is discontinued with mobile
+2though some mods are available, they are extremely difficult to find across the site, since mod support for android is generally discontinued
as for the reason, I don't exactly understand why, but it has something to do about google being incompatible with sp android's game engine.
as for iOS, your luck was out the moment you start playing on apple devices, because apple policies made it extremely difficult to make mods compatible, I believe.
@VeroViper
+2<< Got a Yellow! >>
@Aghsan22
very funny
no.
+2@SuperSuperTheSylph
+2@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@L3FT2R1GHT
+2@rorrE
pixel art always makes me amazed
+2@IQinventory
+2still better than the su35
I have a bone to pick with the "Best 4.5th Gen in service" statement, but this is sp.com so I'm not gonna argue
+2@AirPhilipphinesFlight541
+2@CaptainNoble
@BadahhMuscleCar001
@TheMouse
+2he's in the walls
also thamk
@CrestelAeronautics @TheUltimatePlaneLover
+2As much doubtful the Su-57's stealth is, I suggest for you to not disrespect the Su-57.
As one say, if you let your guard down just because of a rumor, you could pay for it with your life.
Also I like the Su-57.
@Monarchii
+2I'm in pain
I'm surprised you tried to put this much detail on a Block 72 in under 96 parts. Nice work.
+2I honestly could not care more about ads
+2I don't have all day to watch ads so, I just often turn my brain off whenever I see an ad. Just like how the AIM-9M turns off it's seeker whenever it senses a flare
imagine someone makes a Mirage 2000
+2or a eurofighter typhoon (it's also called the EF2000)
@Cerdd
+2fr
boutta make this thing "historically accurate"
+2mm yes
+2starts as a dating sim
ends as an apocalyptic mech sim
I'm going to be brutally honest, I feel really sorry for you. This is a pitiful sight.
+2@DatMaluchGuy19
+2@IceCraftGaming
@Shimamurahougetsu
he's back
I'm assuming with vengeance.
+2I believe it's because of drag, I'm not sure myself.
+2If that's the case, you can disable drag on some parts to make it lighter.
ya'll be acting like flyout is a death sentence to sp
+2calm down
sp will still be here for the foreseeable future
this is so goofy I kinda like it
+2you had me at first take suichan I will admit
the fact that when I scroll down to upvote this and I see Andrew's username on the upvote list blows my mind
+2anyway ngl it looks kinda like a goofi j10
@XAircraftManufacturer
+2@DatMaluchGuy19
@IceCraftGaming
another day, another hour, another one takes a life.
+2Oh no.
+2I have plans and this is a very tempting challenge to disrupt my plans.
muh babe :D
+2god the airbrake is cancer
+2there's a "recently" added flight data xml that they added
+2by recently I mean like more than a year ago
which is
TargetLockingandTargetLockedyou can use these, and be sure to clamp01 it
clamp01(SelectedWeapon="Weapon_Name")
+2don't forget the clamp, it is very important
sangat epik
+2you did it maverick
+2you absolute madlad
man has a bigger dedication than whatever the fuck I have presented on the site
+2cockpit is nice
+2the tail is more of a gimmick than anything else, and it doesn't make much sense but other than that, epic
sounds like a skill issue to me
+2I agree on heat seeking missiles, another thing I'd like to add is the rear or all aspect capability, it would be so awesome
+2I'm a bit 50/50 on the rocket pods since you can just make them yourself, albeit with great effort
low drag bombs already exist (boom 50), what we truly need is a high drag bomb
you can basically take the boom 25 and rescale it to make an FAB-500 since there's not much different and you can always make custom bombs anyway
kind of agree but then again you can always make a custom model of it yourself
why don't we just rescale, edit the mass and the explosion scale to make a bigger bomb, is that too much task?
you can basically make smart bombs already, we don't really need a new weapon for it
now we have 3 people who make their teasers DCS styled lmao
+2and one person who straight up made DCS in SP.
tournaments no longer exists man
+2