I will try to give an answer in all of your examples with my limited english skills so please be patient with me.
Tu4 vs B29 partially correct. What the SU did exactly was to make exact copies of the one b29 they got their hands on and not just repaint a bunch of stolen b29s.
Mig31 vs F-15
First off the mig31 is an interceptor while the f15 is a fighter (totally different roles and so different designs to fulfill their asigned roles)
F-15vs Su-27
Those 2 are completely different i don't get how you concluded they are related.
As for the su 57 looking similar with the f22 is more of how stealth works. To conclude, many aircraft may share similarities but thats
More because of the laws of physics tjan because of "lazy" engineering. Hope my english was understandable.
Nice to see someone using the beacon technique. Far superior to the vtol nozzle one.
Would advise you tho to add a few more in various sizes for better effect.
@RussianAce Judging by his behaviour, he doesnt seem older than 15 but anyway, i agree that insulting someone elses country just because you dont like them is not ok (assuming you are talking about the post about how Russia stole US technology) but creating forum posts to make fun of his reaction (both actions dont seem mature) or his popularity on a videogame is not the proper way to deal with it.
would be cooler if you gave some credit for the parts you took from my build
like the guns for example... or the wings on the tie fighter on the teaser picture
(if you ever upload it)
Looks amazing but it has too many drag points. I suggest setting calculate drag to false in the xml editor for the details so that people with potato devices can run it and setting dragscale to 0 on the biggest parts in order to reduce the drag to increase its glide ratio
you should work more on the flight model. I suggest you increase throttle range in order to reduce its acceleration while also reducing the drag via xml. Aditionally a good idea would be to keep the wing loading realistic if you want an acceptable flight behaviour.
Custom control surfaces would have been also nice
one small correction. the titanic had 1 reaction type parsons turbine turning the central shaft which also didnt have its own throttle control. Turbine speed relied solely on the throttle setting of the main reciprocating engines while it was also being "fed" by their exhaust steam.
tommy the commie
+14This post is sus
+7old unrealiable
+5you is the because
+5@MrBANZAI the wright brothers copied the f22 and thats a fact
+5can you please make a mobile friendly version?
+4calculator support when?
+4@desiboy17 actually I am gonna prove you right
+4Moving parts getting attached to stuff they shouldnt
+4no lmao
+3poor maneuverabilty. where are the elevators?
+3I will try to give an answer in all of your examples with my limited english skills so please be patient with me.
+3Tu4 vs B29 partially correct. What the SU did exactly was to make exact copies of the one b29 they got their hands on and not just repaint a bunch of stolen b29s.
Mig31 vs F-15
First off the mig31 is an interceptor while the f15 is a fighter (totally different roles and so different designs to fulfill their asigned roles)
F-15vs Su-27
Those 2 are completely different i don't get how you concluded they are related.
As for the su 57 looking similar with the f22 is more of how stealth works. To conclude, many aircraft may share similarities but thats
More because of the laws of physics tjan because of "lazy" engineering. Hope my english was understandable.
How I land in war thunder
+3o ye
+2yeet bois
+2Τελικα υπαρχουν αρκετοι ελληνες στο σαιτ
+2Nice to see someone using the beacon technique. Far superior to the vtol nozzle one.
+2Would advise you tho to add a few more in various sizes for better effect.
@DanDaFreakinMan yeah its based on the SF 1 Archon ultralight
+2Set their scale via xml to 0.0001
+2@RussianAce Judging by his behaviour, he doesnt seem older than 15 but anyway, i agree that insulting someone elses country just because you dont like them is not ok (assuming you are talking about the post about how Russia stole US technology) but creating forum posts to make fun of his reaction (both actions dont seem mature) or his popularity on a videogame is not the proper way to deal with it.
+2would be cooler if you gave some credit for the parts you took from my build
+2like the guns for example... or the wings on the tie fighter on the teaser picture
(if you ever upload it)
the supreme leader is dead
+2Looks amazing but it has too many drag points. I suggest setting calculate drag to false in the xml editor for the details so that people with potato devices can run it and setting dragscale to 0 on the biggest parts in order to reduce the drag to increase its glide ratio
+2@Tomhu its alright with a little more practise you will be able to build one that surpasses mine just dont rush things
+2This is what i call a worthy successor
+2Lego city is a dysfunctional city
+2very nice
+2no seatbelts die like real man
+2gg mine didnt even take off :/
+2seems like we cant leave our vtol engines behind shame
+2i thought pride month was over
+2"this was so annoying to make" sums up every replica lol
+2The weapons hatch is a rare feature in most planes of the site good job!
+2@SanitaterAirlines silver masterrace
+2its a shame its has only 2 upvotes
+2@Linxy sure
+1thats cool and all but when mobile version?
+1if you suspect your bomber has parasites you should better take it to the vet
+1really love the sea plane
+1the return of the king
+1my planes are more unlisted than yours chekmate
+1@X99STRIKER you are most welcome
+1O
+1@Rodrigo110 ναι μπορεί κανεί να πεί πως είμαι "αγγλικαλός''
+1@Rodrigo110 συνήθως
+1Samsung fridge support when?
+1you should work more on the flight model. I suggest you increase throttle range in order to reduce its acceleration while also reducing the drag via xml. Aditionally a good idea would be to keep the wing loading realistic if you want an acceptable flight behaviour.
+1Custom control surfaces would have been also nice
@Gestour hope the +4 parts aint much of a problem
+1one small correction. the titanic had 1 reaction type parsons turbine turning the central shaft which also didnt have its own throttle control. Turbine speed relied solely on the throttle setting of the main reciprocating engines while it was also being "fed" by their exhaust steam.
+1yeet bois
+1