and it also need some more little thing like the wings that must be in a higher position, the vertical stabs must have some dihedral and the wings too. The wings also must be more to the back, almost touching the vertical stabs. On the landing gears, the front wheel of the two wheels of the rear gear must be the one who's facing the interior of the plane and not the rear one.
@rexrexThezion oh yeah I really does, I past the last houre playing with it, it's very cool to just chill in the game and making some stunts, the plane is very good looking and the controls are perfect, great job on it ! We can really see your evolution with this build.
It's for sure a beautiful build, but not a beautiful Mirage (as many french player I love this plane and love to see a really good one). I like the fact that you used concave parts but you killed the beautiful shape of the Mirage, also the Mirage was a very flyable plane, the flight caracteristics on yours aren't good at all. Not saying you made a bad plane, it is a good build, I like it. But it is a little to far from what the Mirage really is. Sorry for my bad english by the way
@DarthAbhinav I'll let the mods do it then, I'm pretty sure with that with all that mess they will see it, I wasn't offending anybody, this word wasn't even used to say something bad. If my post get removed about that, I'll think that I have nothing to do in a communauty that for exemple find the German Corsair event great but find it shocking to see a word in a description, that, in my language (french) is sometimes used like a normal word.
ton avion est hyper agréable à faire voler et ça c'est top ! Niveau gueule bon un avion avec des ailes dans cette configuration on en voit pas beaucoup et je ne peux que l'aimer, dommage cependant pour les surfaces de contrôles qui sont en full curved ou circular, tu aurais du faire hard hard circular circular et pareil pour la partie de l'aille qui supporte la surface de contrôle. mais à part ça super bon taff je kiff :D
your plane is super fun to fly and that's great! It's a good looking airplane with wings in this configuration we do not see a lot of them and I can only like it, too bad for the control surfaces which are in full curved or circular, you should have made hard hard circular and the same for the part of the wing that supports the control surface. but apart from that super good job I like :D
Y a de l'effort mais c'est pas fini comme build, il manque BEAUCOUP de détail et le nez et même pas bien fait, tu aurais aussi pu mettre une miniature histoire de mettre l'avion en valeur, ce B2 est pq fini, pourquoi faire les surfaces de contrôles d'une autre couleur ? On voit bien sur le blueprint qu'il y a d'autres détails . La description est mi français mi anglais, et tu notes toi-même ton avion, par rapport à quoi ? Quel est le barème, tu notes un avions par rapport à rien ça n'a pas de sens, évidemment qu'un avion avec moins de 150 parts vole bien.
@PenguinPlanes I didn't say that I or we need more upvotes, and yes it's a game, but when you share your creations on the internet you also want to know if the people like it or not (otherways you wouldn't do it), and on SP the upvotes are here to tell if you made something cool or not for the community, it's only my oppinion but I think it's important. And please don't say me to calm down because at the moment you didn't knew my way of thinking on that. (sorry for my bad english by the way)
I don't want to seem rude but, you made some amazing looking planes and this one even if it's not totally garbage seems like you didn't really want to do this plane
@Graingy yes I did, you forgot but somebody else asked me for the solution on discord, the problem is that I have issues with taking screenshots when the reshade tab is open since it's protected by something that won't let me take screenshots
gg, it's really cool that you succed such a high score, not everyone can do that, most players haven't reach 100 upvotes on a build.
However, do you think you deserve those ? Not being mean or anything, I'm just curious about what you think about it, do you think your build is better than most builds on the front page ? Or that the other 100+ upvotes builds you've seen out here were better or not.
I feel like that (memes builds put aside), most builds getting such an amount of upvotes are generally higher quality.
Good job tho, can't wait to see your next builds, I feel like you wanna do good stuff and that's the only thing that matters for me.
@Luminaria you're giving points for speed ? Most planes don't have the same top speeds that's absurd...
I don't even see a criteria for the build quality or how efficient it is...
@CaptainNoble I do agree, being a friend shouldn't mean that you can't evaluate someones build in a honest way.
But at the end of the day, I just hope that everybody enjoy the game for what it is, and maybe, most of these players aren't looking for the same things as we do and are happy with what they see.
What's a poor quality build for us maybe is great for them :))
@Graingy no trouble to be seen, as I said, it's all very subjective, my criterias aren't yours, I'm complaining a lot but if I wanna enjoy a craft I just build my own, that'w the point of this game :))
I like my builds, and I do hope you like yours, that's all that matters.
@WhaleFall
Acceleration is comedy as much as the top speed is, the plane is flying at +mach even at 50% Throttle. It turns like crazy and even tho I didn't open the debug console to get the numbers I'm sure that it pulls more than 20Gs at almost every turns. It feels like an arcade version of Ace Combat (this game already being arcade)...
You say that you did build this with mobile players in mind but that's not why you didn't put any FT, it's more likely because you don't know anything about it, and that's not a bad thing, I suck at it too, but I do accept criticism and won't pull out stupid excuses when somebody point this out.
Also, a good flight model doesn't always need FT, so that's just an excuse.
On top of that, +850 parts and +3800 perf cost isn't that mobile friendly.
Just accept criticism
Your build is beautiful, it just doesn't fly good.
So looks over performance ? It's an interesting question, I do think that looks are more important than performance, but is it the case in a low parts build ?
@SC2311 It's already really good, and it's visible from far away tht you're really trying to improve your skills and make interesting builds. SimplePlanes has a weird progression curve, so it's okey to have less skills in like making a flight model than making a fuselage.
For the part count, the look of it is already very good, could be improved of course but it's really good, and funkytrees also something else, I'm a total noob at it, but you can seek help everywhere, all the codes I use are maybe by people that's I reached for some help :)
Anyway, keep it up !
(Sorry for my crappy english)
@SC2311 Thanks ! It's not perfect at all but it was the max I could achieve with my skills, still pretty happy with it even tho I'm remember the last two ~ three months weren't fun at all anymore, just focusing over doing ad detail then another then another
@RoastHam9146 I do use one too, that also simulate the delay before blacking/reding-out and the delay of recuperation time, maybe you could be interested in seeing it
Hi ! This builds looks cool, didn't have the time to test it yet so I'm gonna do it later, just being curious, where di you grab that blackout / redout effect ? Didn't see many out there, maybe you even made yours.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Yeah well there's the point, you say you did it because you saw it as a fun challenge, that sound like a good motivation, but doing it for upvotes ??
Once again, I don't really care about them, but the point is, why would you care about them ? I mean, everyday I go to work to hget money, but when I do the stuff I like, I don't do it for money, it ain't wasted time tho, and not getting anything from the things I like won't make me stop doing these things. Same goes for SP, why would you try to catch upvotes ? I just don't get it, doing it for upvotes just sound like your playing SP like it was a part time job.
Also, about your PEAs planes, for me they ain't PEA, they're just low part / quality planes.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Part efficienty has nothing to do with low part count. Part efficienty is being economical in the way you choose and use the parts. Low part count is just a build with a "low" part count.
If your build is sitting at 50 parts, but you used 20 of them to build your landing gears, in ain't efficient, if your build has 1000 parts and you used 50 of them for the landing gears, it's efficient.
@Cerdd yeah it's a good thing, build for yourself, it's a game after all :)
+2@9UMP @PeePeePoo_Poo @Sovietstrike333 @
+2man this is so bliatiful !
+2GG for plat !
+2and it also need some more little thing like the wings that must be in a higher position, the vertical stabs must have some dihedral and the wings too. The wings also must be more to the back, almost touching the vertical stabs. On the landing gears, the front wheel of the two wheels of the rear gear must be the one who's facing the interior of the plane and not the rear one.
+2kraken definitly is a boy
+2@rexrexThezion oh yeah I really does, I past the last houre playing with it, it's very cool to just chill in the game and making some stunts, the plane is very good looking and the controls are perfect, great job on it ! We can really see your evolution with this build.
+2@Sovietstrike333 @Planeacceleration @CFSP_NinjaPro
+2It's for sure a beautiful build, but not a beautiful Mirage (as many french player I love this plane and love to see a really good one). I like the fact that you used concave parts but you killed the beautiful shape of the Mirage, also the Mirage was a very flyable plane, the flight caracteristics on yours aren't good at all. Not saying you made a bad plane, it is a good build, I like it. But it is a little to far from what the Mirage really is. Sorry for my bad english by the way
+2@Defalt1 childs have nothing to do on the internet, it's not my problem
+2@DarthAbhinav I'll let the mods do it then, I'm pretty sure with that with all that mess they will see it, I wasn't offending anybody, this word wasn't even used to say something bad. If my post get removed about that, I'll think that I have nothing to do in a communauty that for exemple find the German Corsair event great but find it shocking to see a word in a description, that, in my language (french) is sometimes used like a normal word.
+2ton avion est hyper agréable à faire voler et ça c'est top ! Niveau gueule bon un avion avec des ailes dans cette configuration on en voit pas beaucoup et je ne peux que l'aimer, dommage cependant pour les surfaces de contrôles qui sont en full curved ou circular, tu aurais du faire hard hard circular circular et pareil pour la partie de l'aille qui supporte la surface de contrôle. mais à part ça super bon taff je kiff :D
your plane is super fun to fly and that's great! It's a good looking airplane with wings in this configuration we do not see a lot of them and I can only like it, too bad for the control surfaces which are in full curved or circular, you should have made hard hard circular and the same for the part of the wing that supports the control surface. but apart from that super good job I like :D
+2Y a de l'effort mais c'est pas fini comme build, il manque BEAUCOUP de détail et le nez et même pas bien fait, tu aurais aussi pu mettre une miniature histoire de mettre l'avion en valeur, ce B2 est pq fini, pourquoi faire les surfaces de contrôles d'une autre couleur ? On voit bien sur le blueprint qu'il y a d'autres détails . La description est mi français mi anglais, et tu notes toi-même ton avion, par rapport à quoi ? Quel est le barème, tu notes un avions par rapport à rien ça n'a pas de sens, évidemment qu'un avion avec moins de 150 parts vole bien.
+2chouette
+2Sexy
+2@PenguinPlanes I didn't say that I or we need more upvotes, and yes it's a game, but when you share your creations on the internet you also want to know if the people like it or not (otherways you wouldn't do it), and on SP the upvotes are here to tell if you made something cool or not for the community, it's only my oppinion but I think it's important. And please don't say me to calm down because at the moment you didn't knew my way of thinking on that. (sorry for my bad english by the way)
+2I don't want to seem rude but, you made some amazing looking planes and this one even if it's not totally garbage seems like you didn't really want to do this plane
+2@edensk true, I made the version that the swiss air force used
+2@AerobaticTeam2018 yup
+2@Inuyasha8215 thanks !
+2I've been around for more than 7 years, started playing when I was 14, I'm now 21, time really does fly
+1@Graingy yes I did, you forgot but somebody else asked me for the solution on discord, the problem is that I have issues with taking screenshots when the reshade tab is open since it's protected by something that won't let me take screenshots
+1@Trainzo if you need some screenshots you know who to call !
+1Nice
+1gg, it's really cool that you succed such a high score, not everyone can do that, most players haven't reach 100 upvotes on a build.
However, do you think you deserve those ? Not being mean or anything, I'm just curious about what you think about it, do you think your build is better than most builds on the front page ? Or that the other 100+ upvotes builds you've seen out here were better or not.
I feel like that (memes builds put aside), most builds getting such an amount of upvotes are generally higher quality.
Good job tho, can't wait to see your next builds, I feel like you wanna do good stuff and that's the only thing that matters for me.
+1@F8boa that's good news haha
+1@F8boa his is more stable and user friendly, also over all he did a better job than me in my opinion
+1@Luminaria you're giving points for speed ? Most planes don't have the same top speeds that's absurd...
+1I don't even see a criteria for the build quality or how efficient it is...
@CaptainNoble I do agree, being a friend shouldn't mean that you can't evaluate someones build in a honest way.
+1But at the end of the day, I just hope that everybody enjoy the game for what it is, and maybe, most of these players aren't looking for the same things as we do and are happy with what they see.
What's a poor quality build for us maybe is great for them :))
@Graingy no trouble to be seen, as I said, it's all very subjective, my criterias aren't yours, I'm complaining a lot but if I wanna enjoy a craft I just build my own, that'w the point of this game :))
+1I like my builds, and I do hope you like yours, that's all that matters.
@GuardianAerospace I feel like you're the same as I am, 20% of building and 80% of looking at your creation haha
+1@GuardianAerospace it was a joke because the shape isn't that smooth
+1@F8boa by pulling the handles on the side of your sit towards you
+1@WhaleFall
Acceleration is comedy as much as the top speed is, the plane is flying at +mach even at 50% Throttle. It turns like crazy and even tho I didn't open the debug console to get the numbers I'm sure that it pulls more than 20Gs at almost every turns.
It feels like an arcade version of Ace Combat (this game already being arcade)...
You say that you did build this with mobile players in mind but that's not why you didn't put any FT, it's more likely because you don't know anything about it, and that's not a bad thing, I suck at it too, but I do accept criticism and won't pull out stupid excuses when somebody point this out.
Also, a good flight model doesn't always need FT, so that's just an excuse.
On top of that, +850 parts and +3800 perf cost isn't that mobile friendly.
Just accept criticism
Your build is beautiful, it just doesn't fly good.
+1@MrCOPTY just let them be virgins
+1Was the almost naked young lady necessary on the front of the tank ? Also, why hide it on the screenshots ?
+1So looks over performance ? It's an interesting question, I do think that looks are more important than performance, but is it the case in a low parts build ?
+1The plane is what it is, but almost 4 years of dedication on a build deserves an upvote
+1@SC2311 oh bruh that's a shitty situation haha, well don't hesitate to ping me on a post or any forum if you seek some help :)
+1@SC2311 If you want I can give you my discord so if you need any help I could help you
+1@SC2311 It's already really good, and it's visible from far away tht you're really trying to improve your skills and make interesting builds. SimplePlanes has a weird progression curve, so it's okey to have less skills in like making a flight model than making a fuselage.
+1For the part count, the look of it is already very good, could be improved of course but it's really good, and funkytrees also something else, I'm a total noob at it, but you can seek help everywhere, all the codes I use are maybe by people that's I reached for some help :)
Anyway, keep it up !
(Sorry for my crappy english)
@SC2311 Thanks ! It's not perfect at all but it was the max I could achieve with my skills, still pretty happy with it even tho I'm remember the last two ~ three months weren't fun at all anymore, just focusing over doing ad detail then another then another
+1@SyntheticL good old times when my average part count was under 1000 parts
+1@MrCOPTY I'd love to
+1@RoastHam9146 I do use one too, that also simulate the delay before blacking/reding-out and the delay of recuperation time, maybe you could be interested in seeing it
+1Hi ! This builds looks cool, didn't have the time to test it yet so I'm gonna do it later, just being curious, where di you grab that blackout / redout effect ? Didn't see many out there, maybe you even made yours.
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Yeah well there's the point, you say you did it because you saw it as a fun challenge, that sound like a good motivation, but doing it for upvotes ??
+1Once again, I don't really care about them, but the point is, why would you care about them ? I mean, everyday I go to work to hget money, but when I do the stuff I like, I don't do it for money, it ain't wasted time tho, and not getting anything from the things I like won't make me stop doing these things. Same goes for SP, why would you try to catch upvotes ? I just don't get it, doing it for upvotes just sound like your playing SP like it was a part time job.
Also, about your PEAs planes, for me they ain't PEA, they're just low part / quality planes.
@Pan I only make replicas, but that doesn't mean I made my personality around that, same goes for them.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover un-popular opinion : maturity is realising that fun is just the right amount of realism, not a plane that can take 20Gs.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Part efficienty has nothing to do with low part count.
+1Part efficienty is being economical in the way you choose and use the parts.
Low part count is just a build with a "low" part count.
If your build is sitting at 50 parts, but you used 20 of them to build your landing gears, in ain't efficient, if your build has 1000 parts and you used 50 of them for the landing gears, it's efficient.