6,463 AnOlympicWalnut Comments

  • Messerschmitt BF-109G 5.8 years ago

    @Sm10684 It's there for historical accuracy. By no means is the creator @Sulaiman123 approving anything of the Nazi Party or the Reich. They didn't put the symbol on there to agree with the Reich. The symbol was almost always put on these fighters and it's just another part to add to the historical accuracy this aircraft has to offer. We do agree with your standpoint though. The Nazis are a dark and twisted party.

    +7
  • Happy Cyanide 6.1 years ago

    He kind of looks like his reaction after someone did something downright stupid.

    +3
  • A-1 (sauce) warthog 6.3 years ago

    r/woosh

    +3
  • WW2 Insignias pack 2.0 6.5 years ago

    This’ll come into great use...

    +3
  • When your post gets deleted for nothing. 6.7 years ago

    Well that sucks. Hopefully it doesn’t happen again.

    +3
  • Good-bye Simpleplanes...... 6.8 years ago

    We're gonna miss you!

    +3
  • (solved) Reverse Light Help - Funky Trees 4.6 years ago

    Thanks to @An2k, @randomusername, and @edensk for helping!

    After some trial and error, I finally figured it out with your help.

    I had to use [-clamp(Pitch, -1,0)] as the code, and it finally worked for me.

    Again, thanks very much for your help!

    +2
  • Boeing Microfighter 5.8 years ago

    Looks like somebody watches Mustard

    +2
  • Yeet 6.1 years ago

    The F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-82 Octuple Mustang

    +2
  • Circular Runway 6.3 years ago

    Literally every pilot ever: internally screaming

    +2
  • What do the units for length equal? 6.4 years ago

    The unit (in fuselage blocks) 1 equals 0.50292 meters or 1.65 feet.

    +2
  • Walnut's Plane Classification 6.4 years ago

    @destroyerP

    B - BeeCraft (an aircraft that cruises at an average of 30 mph, flaps its structurally poor wings up and down, breaks all known laws of flight, and is often codenamed "Barry")

    +2
  • I need some tips on how to make my plane more stable 6.5 years ago

    My suggestions are to add more rudders, move the COL further to the back, and maybe add some more power. Remember that the centers (COL, COW, and COT) are key to an aircraft.

    +2
  • I need your help everyone... 6.7 years ago

    Try experimenting with different types of engines and quantity of engines on planes. Don't be afraid to give it a lot of power. Search up planes like the Do 335, Westland Wyvern, XP-55 Ascender, etc. Don't be afraid to use basic blocks if fuselage blocks become too complex. We understand.

    +2
  • Penrose Trapezoid 6.7 years ago

    Yeah... Yeah i did @BACconcordepilot

    +2
  • PH-32 Ghoster 6.8 years ago

    Pros: Good amount of explosives, has a minigun, and lots of space for modifications
    Cons: very sluggish, could be redesigned for better looks, and could use a lighter engine for more speed. I suggest looking at Jundroo's P-51 and try to use it's stats. Other than that, good start. Try remaking an aircraft!

    +2
  • Hecka Island 4.5 years ago

    Anyone posting times? I got a 02:26:04 if anybody wants to beat it

    +1
  • Nakajima J11N2 'Nashika' 5.5 years ago

    This is an epic fictional WW2 jet fighter but there's one little thing. It was created in Nov-Dec 1946 but participated in Pearl Harbor?

    Still cool fighter tho take my upvote

    +1
  • C-46 Student Mk IV 5.8 years ago

    Many student pilots have flown alone, but there’s a cabinet in the back (see da windows) so ya @Sarin

    +1
  • New USS Beast Feature Question (Spoilers!..if anybody cares lol) 5.8 years ago

    Thanks for letting me know @Tw1st3dPs7ch0! I wanted to see if I could test that.

    +1
  • Boeing Microfighter 5.8 years ago

    @Agung44 Yes, and I thank you for making the microfighter. I kinda wanted to see it in SP.

    +1
  • New USS Beast Feature Question (Spoilers!..if anybody cares lol) 5.8 years ago

    You will have a time similar to dropping ice cream or getting bad service at a restaurant @BACconcordepilot. (It's gonna be the Philidelphia Experiment all over again.)

    +1
  • The Lamest Beta Ever 5.8 years ago

    I much agree with @communisticbanana

    +1
  • Walnut's Air Superiority Potency (W.A.S.P) Full Story 5.9 years ago

    @Squirrel Perfect coincidence lol

    +1
  • My First Plane 6.0 years ago

    Already looks better than my first lol

    +1
  • 2nd video in the Design introduction category 6.0 years ago

    T
    Here’s the FI-78 Vortex Mk II, a fighter/interceptor
    Also, I like where these videos are going. It’s a smart way to feature builds.

    +1
  • Attack aircraft 6.0 years ago

    Pros:
    Behaves realistically|models are well made|engine pistons are simple and cleverly made|texture is nice|low part count, making the craft framerate efficient|Creative (not based on a real model)

    Cons:
    MG on the back doesn't seem to work|too much fuel (you shouldn't need 891 gallons)|camera for the cockpit doesn't have any sights, nor does it snap back to original sight

    Overall:
    7.5/10 good build. Deserves upvote!

    +1
  • Enemy 6.0 years ago

    @WarHawk95 oh wow, thanks! I'm gonna try comparing mine to the real one soon. Also, good job on finding it!

    +1
  • Enemy 6.0 years ago

    So was this recreated or did you somehow find the real file? I recreated my own enemy too but I couldn't find anything on Jundroo's account

    +1
  • F/A-61 Combat Tercel 6.0 years ago

    Unimaginably excellent job not only on the aircraft, the the description itself too!

    +1
  • Classic Motorcycle 6.0 years ago

    You may want to add a gyroscope and fix the wheels. By then, it should run fairly ok. Also remove the leg, since the gyro will keep you steady as a rock.

    p.s <3 the body design and color

    +1
  • P-51 Mustang 6.3 years ago

    You did surpassingly well with the fuselage body but there are 18 exhausts, meaning there must be a V18 inside instead of a V12 Merlin. Still good job tho!

    +1
  • T-65 X-Wing Starfighter UPDATED 6.4 years ago

    Hey @Kerbango thanks very much for the links! She will love these videos!

    +1
  • P-47N 6.5 years ago

    Not bad of the frontal cockpit design, guns are well placed, and flaps are checked off. Good start! @MIWTheGamer

    +1
  • F-32A Macross Valkyrie 6.6 years ago

    Flies at great speed, great armament, military style, and interceptor feel. Excellent job!

    +1
  • 3,000 Milestone 6.6 years ago

    @FastDan Therefore too many thanks!

    +1
  • 3,000 Milestone 6.6 years ago

    @randomusername, @CRJ900Pilot, @FastDan, @spefyjerbf, @Razor, @BACconcordepilot, @Strikefighter04, @Blue0Bull, @ForeverPie, @JettStorm, @yoshicraze, @300 Roswell, @BrabusMPower, @Lankanski, @BaconRoll, @EliteArsenals24, @getorge, @Mostly, and @Zippy6.

    +1
  • HEAVY transport(HT-A1) 6.6 years ago

    You’re fine! Just don’t stress yourself too much @Colonel1J2R3Wolf

    +1
  • Supermarine Spitfire 3 6.7 years ago

    Pretty much the entire time I worked on this revision was remaking the cockpit. Thanks for saying what you noticed @WilhelmScream!

    +1
  • Gotta go way too fast 6.7 years ago

    I have been defeated @FastDan

    +1
  • Gotta go way too fast 6.7 years ago

    @FastDan you're the one who saw my secret creation! The C-62! I wasn't fast enough to remove it from public and it's supposed to be unlisted. Maybe that's why you're called FastDan, huh?

    +1
  • Penrose Trapezoid 6.7 years ago

    I’m trippin

    +1
  • Coming up... 6.7 years ago

    Looks good

    +1
  • DROPSHIP 6.7 years ago

    Very well detailed! The controls certainly aren't the best but this is still VERY high quality. Overall, I think it's great!

    +1
  • Jundroo's Mysterious Enemy (More Tweaks) 6.7 years ago

    Some times, it has only passed by. The last time I saw it though, it attempted to open fire. So yeah, I would proceed with caution @Zippy6.

    +1
  • Hawker Hurricane Mk. I 6.8 years ago

    First plane? I can see you becoming popular in no time!

    +1
  • Pigpen could you reassemble it 6.8 years ago

    Well then. I’ll keep this on my mind!

    +1
  • Supermarine Stalker [FICTIONAL] 6.9 years ago

    Smooth controls, slick design, and amazing firepower. It's better than perfect.

    +1
  • EX-10 Helo Mk II 6.9 years ago

    @TheMagicConch thanks for sending the mod to me! I’ll see what I can do at some point. As of now I use the popular fine tuner mod but I’ll give this mod a go. Again, thanks!

    Edit: Yeeaah I’m going to keep this mod.

    +1
  • Funkytrees Help 1.5 years ago

    @BluestBoi Well duh, missiles have names. I know that. I'm just saying the "name" value doesn't appear in Overload immediately, which is annoying. I'm sure you would've known, but I guess not. That's fine.

    If you want to look at custom values, I already explained that you can type in anything, technically.

    As for specifically selecting a weapon, from my understanding you cannot pull that off, although you still can just use "NextWeapon" or the hotkey F.

    I'm sure SOMEONE found a way, or not, but that's beyond both of us!