@FeatherWing Well, the first one that stuck out to me was being able to pull 16 Gs sustained. I should mention this isn't an uncommon issue, managing the performance character of a build is one of the most complicated steps.
This is pretty good overall. Watching how you built and developed this, there's a lot of potential there. I think it suffers from the pitfalls of performance but its a really nice effort overall. I'm looking forward to what you build next.
@Thecatbaron I want you to know how amazing this is and how much time it took me to hunt this post down. I tried to design a missile after taking apart yours and learning how it worked and, well, I've ended up with a poor (but functional) imitation. Massive kudos for getting it working so well, I can only imagine what you went through.
@Giantwhale I'm not at all a funky trees expert. And honestly, it's not necessary until you get quite advanced. You can build good looking and good flying builds without it it. People did and still do. Then you can utilise some basic Funky trees code to improve your builds once you've gotten your quality improved.
However,if you're dead set on using funky trees prematurely there are places such as the funky trees guide. Still, I'd advise against it for now. Focus on learning to build better first.
@Giantwhale In two word: Iteration & imitation
By that I mean, learning from those around me, copying their styles (of course without stealing anything) and then developing my own methods from what I see/learn.
It's a mix of passion for aviation, patience and practice. A lot of my planes don't make it onto the site, haha. Feel free to download what I make and tinker with it. If it helps you learn/improve I'm happy with it.
Just uh, don't repost my build and claim it as your own. That's all I ask.
@PaulJohnLozada night mode is fine so long as its not the main thumbnail. If you want your build to be seen you need to let it be, well, seen. As it is the plane is barely visible.
Hiyo, one tidbit of advice to get your build more traction is to not take pictures at night for the primary thumbnail. It's quite difficult to see any detail on it.
@Gauss @communisticbanana @KerlonceauxIndustries Thanks.
+1@AdlerSteiner slopes everywhere
+1@DeidaraEnterprises I am Dio after all
Thanks fam
+1@exosuit fun sized vicky
+1@randomusername First time I've seen a comparison like that, I really like it. Do you mind giving me a link to your jet?
+1@PositivePlanes Let's see how it goes. Thanks for the upvote
+1@PyrusEnderhunter Thank you
@Peanor @RocCrafter101 Thanks.
It's funny I see this, I built what would happen if an F-18 and an Su-33 had kids.
Very nice build
+1@TheRussiansAreComing thank you, I'll continue working my way to gold. Hopefully I'll get more traction to my builds.
+1@KerlonceauxIndustries thanks
+1@BoomiesYT Thanks
+1@randomusername Whoops, forgot about that.
+1Should work fine now.
@Abhishek700 @JED http://www.simpleplanes.com/a/DrVz7R/Eurofighter-Twister-EF-2030-No-mods
Here's a link to it without any mods. Have fun.
+1@KerlonceauxIndustries Oh no, haha. Thanks for the spotlight and upvote. Gonna keep working on its updates in the background.
+1@Frenchfry @KerlonceauxIndustries @Feanor @yoshicraze @Aarons123 Thanks for the upvotes.
+1@KerlonceauxIndustries Thank and yeh. Let's see anybody sink this bad boy.
+1@Texasfam04 As always, thanks. Your encouragement keeps me motivated.
+1@DuckMint Strange place indeed. Perhaps for under sand operations
+1@GeneralOliverVonBismarck @Texasfam04 Thanks guys.
+1A challenger approaches!
Seriously though, excellent looking build. I haven't flow it yet but if it flies anything like it looks, gonna be amazing
incredible.
@asteroidbook345 I wonder, do you mean the A-7 they were working on?
@Phoebe There's definitely some AMX International influence
@CarrotSlicingCat exactly 1393 parts, was just checking
This is beautiful. I love the cockpit as well and all the functionality. Definitely going to give this a fly later.
Beautiful plane, really well done overall. Looking forward to your next build.
This build is so good looking I considered removing my upvote just so I could upvote it again.
the first jag has landed. Amazing looking build.
@FeatherWing Well, the first one that stuck out to me was being able to pull 16 Gs sustained. I should mention this isn't an uncommon issue, managing the performance character of a build is one of the most complicated steps.
This is pretty good overall. Watching how you built and developed this, there's a lot of potential there. I think it suffers from the pitfalls of performance but its a really nice effort overall. I'm looking forward to what you build next.
This is a pretty good trailer, nice work
@Thecatbaron I want you to know how amazing this is and how much time it took me to hunt this post down. I tried to design a missile after taking apart yours and learning how it worked and, well, I've ended up with a poor (but functional) imitation. Massive kudos for getting it working so well, I can only imagine what you went through.
@FumoCirno yes. I have awakened.
@Walvis many thanks.
@Giantwhale I'm not at all a funky trees expert. And honestly, it's not necessary until you get quite advanced. You can build good looking and good flying builds without it it. People did and still do. Then you can utilise some basic Funky trees code to improve your builds once you've gotten your quality improved.
However,if you're dead set on using funky trees prematurely there are places such as the funky trees guide. Still, I'd advise against it for now. Focus on learning to build better first.
@Giantwhale In two word: Iteration & imitation
By that I mean, learning from those around me, copying their styles (of course without stealing anything) and then developing my own methods from what I see/learn.
It's a mix of passion for aviation, patience and practice. A lot of my planes don't make it onto the site, haha. Feel free to download what I make and tinker with it. If it helps you learn/improve I'm happy with it.
Just uh, don't repost my build and claim it as your own. That's all I ask.
Those who requested to be tagged (that I can remember)
@Captain247
@JuanNotAnAlt the smell's all around us
I would spotlight this if I could. Well made.
@PaulJohnLozada oh, you don't have to. It was just advice for future builds.
@PaulJohnLozada night mode is fine so long as its not the main thumbnail. If you want your build to be seen you need to let it be, well, seen. As it is the plane is barely visible.
Hiyo, one tidbit of advice to get your build more traction is to not take pictures at night for the primary thumbnail. It's quite difficult to see any detail on it.
Looking at it overall, its not bad. Keep it up.
@Karzigg glad to be back. I'll be posting a little more often from now.
@Walvis @Neenyboy @PyrusEnderhunter thank you all of you!
@EagleKiller99989 I have a fictional nation, yes
@ZippyyThecat are you implying my plane is low effort or consoling my effort? not sure which.
@Rakoval500k the original control input wouldn't be able to do that but a linear equation would work:
You can use this tool the generate a linear equation for control (Credit to @SnoWFLakE0s for writing this tool)
@Rakoval500k It's been a while so I don't remember. You asked very nicely so I'll go and check for you.
This is actually supper cute tho!
This.
This is gorgeous.
@Jerba That's my style, glad you like it.
@DILOPH It's really just the same concept Miksee came up with a long time ago that I replicated from the ground up.