@WiFly monkey see - monkey do. Download things, see how they are made, do the same, repeat. Also, don't be afraid to fail. Not all projects get finished, which is not a reason not to start an ambitious one.
@parkrangerjerry @LieutenantSOT the wing was made for the revamp of the predecessor. I might not post that one, it's just a quick revamp to test the new options.
@Tookan more than before. Quit a bit of time has been freed up by not having to deal with reports, successor link requests, and other stuff. I have a few builds awaiting update parts.
You can make her behave realistically in the waves by using a single huge fuselage block for the bulk of buoyancy. Then have one small buoyant block on each side of it to trim the ship. Set center of mass realistically low, and it will pitch and roll realistically.
@CenturyAerospace or you can just remove 60% of two fuselage blocks and set them as cockpit sides. Then you have a gap between them, both on top and at the bottom.
@HanSeuluh very well. Thank you for cooperation. Have you tried resetting your password via email? I think there's a mechanism for that. It could come in handy if you ever decide to return for a bit.
@JuanAlt @asteroidbook345 @Default4 it's not nice to be jumping to conclusions and to call out a user when his guild hasn't been proven. You may have noticed that even I asked the user for clarification and issued a warning, having not banned them immediately.
@KnightOfRen your comment has been removed. Putting "[REDACTED]" in a place of an obvious curse word, with intent of insulting a user, is still against the rules.
@Aztop033 I must have accidentally delwted it. That version was identical in part count, difference were inputs that used to not work on mobile. That bug is, I believe, fixed now.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@WiFly monkey see - monkey do. Download things, see how they are made, do the same, repeat. Also, don't be afraid to fail. Not all projects get finished, which is not a reason not to start an ambitious one.
+1@Pnicks15 that's the spirit!
+1@Blaize1380 I'm not leaving lol
+1@LieutenantSOT I'm glad I helped :)
+1@parkrangerjerry @LieutenantSOT the wing was made for the revamp of the predecessor. I might not post that one, it's just a quick revamp to test the new options.
+1@tsampoy I did it first but you did it better :)
+1Try
+1Pitch - IAS/x. Adjust "x" as needed, smaller number reduces reduction of elevator deflection less as the speed increases.It should have been wider. 10-1 beam to length ratio looks a bit odd. Other than that, very nice boat.
+1That's the one that makes everyone at Dakar rally disappointed when it shows up, because it's gonna win again?
+1@Chillybaconface I'm back to building stuff. My current builds all need parts that will come with the update, so I'm not posting yet.
+1@Tookan more than before. Quit a bit of time has been freed up by not having to deal with reports, successor link requests, and other stuff. I have a few builds awaiting update parts.
+1@JuanNotAnAlt np.
+1@RC1138Boss it's fine. There's no need for anyone to get banned over this.
+1You can make her behave realistically in the waves by using a single huge fuselage block for the bulk of buoyancy. Then have one small buoyant block on each side of it to trim the ship. Set center of mass realistically low, and it will pitch and roll realistically.
+1@CenturyAerospace or you can just remove 60% of two fuselage blocks and set them as cockpit sides. Then you have a gap between them, both on top and at the bottom.
+1@OtakuNekoToT even if one of the presets isn't altitude indicator, and I think one is, gauge can accept custom inputs.
+1@JuanNotAnAlt I'm just using Discord. It hasn't failed me yet.
+1@marcox43 I have lost quite a few pictures I hosted on Imgur.
@Falkenwut ok.
+1I have edited tags for you. I suggest writing a proper description too.
+1@TatsuTheDemonLord your game crashes because there are parts too far from the coordinate 0,0,0. It happen to me a few times.
+1@Sergio666 no problem. I'm just pointing it out for the future.
+1@DwiAngkasaAeronautics yes.
+1@AnHNWhiteCornet sure.
+1@Deinonychus yes.
+1@HanSeuluh very well. Thank you for cooperation. Have you tried resetting your password via email? I think there's a mechanism for that. It could come in handy if you ever decide to return for a bit.
+1@JuanAlt @asteroidbook345 @Default4 it's not nice to be jumping to conclusions and to call out a user when his guild hasn't been proven. You may have noticed that even I asked the user for clarification and issued a warning, having not banned them immediately.
@Sadboye12 why would you ping mods? What do they have to do with this?
+1Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
+1@LightningTreeSavor it's as obsolete as this engine. You ought to get a bit into fuselage blocks.
+1Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
+1@KnightOfRen your comment has been removed. Putting "[REDACTED]" in a place of an obvious curse word, with intent of insulting a user, is still against the rules.
+1@Aztop033 I must have accidentally delwted it. That version was identical in part count, difference were inputs that used to not work on mobile. That bug is, I believe, fixed now.
+1@Rodrigo110 it causes drama. You may notice James wasn't banned for this, I edited the post to avoid drama.
+1@Cereal thanks.
+1@ToxicAviationAviation while not a top quality upgrade, this build is functionally different from the predecessor. I'll leave it up.
+1What site are you using for image hosting? I suggest hosting them on Discord as it is the most reliable. I can't see them.
+1@ToxicAviationAviation the only difference between this post and the predecessor seems to be the lack of livery.
+1@derjohannes sure.
+1@derjohannes sure. Thanks for providing the code.
+1@GuianLorenzo I made it a successor to the challenge so Thecatbaron doesn't lose it.
+1@00020 your comment has been removed. Please do not discuss politics on the site.
+1@LieutenantSOT why do flying wing when you can do historically accurate lifting body?
+1@CRATE52PART2 go to the correct category and select "new post".
+1Ugly but deadly. Nice details. I especially like how you did the portholes. You should have wasted a few more parts on gun barrels though.
+1@10 original is his too. He just posted a fixed version of his own build.
+1@LieutenantSOT done.
+1Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
+1Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
I have edited the title due to copyright issues with Honda. Honda has very aggressive lawyers. Please do not name your builds "Honda".
+1@MiladicPlanes exactly.
+1@Walvis that has been dealt with.
+1@CharlesDeGaulle your comment has been removed. You have been issued a strike.
+1