This plane should have been made with custom control surfaces. You have a straight trailing edge making it very easy to add them. You can use this technique to have the wing taper in thickness towards the tip.
Coaxial setup also allows speed and maneuverability normal helicopters can't achieve, and is rather docile in retreating blades stall or when a blade tip goes supersonic, as both of these events happen on both sides simultaneously.
@MilesTPrower you don't need detacher delay to make a custom cannon. Delay is an option of the bomb/missile itself, and you can fire custom cannons by launching the weapon that is meant to serve as ammunition. Just attach it directly onto the small side of detacher if it's a bomb cannon, or to big side if it's a custom missile.
Nice build for your level. It's obvious you know stuff about aircraft. Do you already use Overload mod and Fine Tuner mod? I must recommend investing some effort into custom control surfaces, as I believe they would have made this build a lot better.
@SmokestreamAircraft lol. It works with every wing shape. Some of the most prominent builders are using it, including RamboJutter and BogdanX. If you want to see technique applied to the full potential, visit their profiles.
I think you should invest more effort into wings. Fuselage looks great, but wings are way too basic for it. I suggest trying out this technique. It shouldn't be too hard.
@Scharnhorst tried again, same results. I've throttled up to 100 to elevate tubes to vertical, got a lock-on, and launched. Missile got stuck in the tube pointing in the direction of the container at an upward angle, even though tubes were vertical and target wasn't in that direction. It must have impacted something. PC, high physics.
@JonTKocz you ned to post them somewhere first. Site doesn't host pictures. Then you write . If you use Imgur, remove "s" from "https".
@Chancey21 yeah, it's a borderline case, but better safe than sorry. You'll notice I haven't removed the post. Can't wait to test this plane. (figure of speech. I'm not testing any entry before the deadline)
I've edited the part that is borderline begging for upvotes. I understand you didn't do it on purpose, but please don't use "upvote to be tagged" anymore.
I post every plane unlisted a few times during the building so my friends can test it and suggest improvements. I also write the whole description on an unlisted version so that it can be posted just seconds after the build is uploaded.
Excellent build, especially for your level. Very smooth flier, nice details, and good proportion.
By the way, to tag a user, put "@" in front of their username. That sends them notification about your comment. You can tag up to three users per comment, the rest won't get a notification.
I'll feature your plane so everybody can see it on the front page :)
@haogejiuhaoge1 I can't do a thing. I only moderate the site. You need guys with blue tags. Or post your suggestion to Uservoice. You can find the link to it under "Stuff".
Btw, upvote is for the flight model. This is a very stable flyer. Landing gear is a bit basic, but nice. I'm glad you have left control surfaces visible (I hate it when people cover control surfaces), but I think you should try experimenting with custom ones. And what I meant by "better, more realistic proportion" is that the fuselage is too tall. Usually, planes of this category (busyness turboprop) have nearly cylindrical or perfectly cylindrical fuselage.
This plane should have been made with custom control surfaces. You have a straight trailing edge making it very easy to add them. You can use this technique to have the wing taper in thickness towards the tip.
+1@BRuthless no problem.
+1Helicopters need a vertical stabilizer.
+1It looks quite nice so far.
+1@mikoyanster @ThunderNova @WrightAirCo
+1@RamboJutter @Kimcotupan15 @jamesPLANESii
+1Read this. Helicopter rotors on SP are way more realistic than you think.
+1I can't unfeature a build. Also, I feature very rarely. I'll let other moderators decide if they want to feature that build.
+1One of our guys thought it would be funny to fill the "feature" line with only MiGs, and just took any good MiGs he could find.
+1Coaxial setup also allows speed and maneuverability normal helicopters can't achieve, and is rather docile in retreating blades stall or when a blade tip goes supersonic, as both of these events happen on both sides simultaneously.
+1@Gestour *fewer
+1@Chancey21 slowly but surely, yes. I was planning on finishing today, but I was busy. Should be done tomorrow or the day after.
+1@MilesTPrower you don't need detacher delay to make a custom cannon. Delay is an option of the bomb/missile itself, and you can fire custom cannons by launching the weapon that is meant to serve as ammunition. Just attach it directly onto the small side of detacher if it's a bomb cannon, or to big side if it's a custom missile.
+1Nice build for your level. It's obvious you know stuff about aircraft. Do you already use Overload mod and Fine Tuner mod? I must recommend investing some effort into custom control surfaces, as I believe they would have made this build a lot better.
+1@A3 thanks buddy :)
+1@PhilipTarpley the fix works. Thanks.
+1@shipster it's literally in the title. And highlighted in the post.
+1@SmokestreamAircraft lol. It works with every wing shape. Some of the most prominent builders are using it, including RamboJutter and BogdanX. If you want to see technique applied to the full potential, visit their profiles.
+1Republic of Serbia
+1Very nice. Are you gonna revamp it with new rotors?
+1I think you should invest more effort into wings. Fuselage looks great, but wings are way too basic for it. I suggest trying out this technique. It shouldn't be too hard.
+1@Zott no problem.
+1@grizzlitn no problem.
+1@AndrewGarrison is it possible to recover the comments that contained ratings? It would be hours of work to rate all those entries again.
+1@Chancey21 I look into my crystal ball to see when good builds will be uploaded.
+1@Chancey21 eh, sure...
+1@Scharnhorst tried again, same results. I've throttled up to 100 to elevate tubes to vertical, got a lock-on, and launched. Missile got stuck in the tube pointing in the direction of the container at an upward angle, even though tubes were vertical and target wasn't in that direction. It must have impacted something. PC, high physics.
+1Congratulations.
+1Joke aside, nice post.
+1@WHISKY12 I won't be making challenges for a while after this one.
+1@Morel234 @Strikefighter04 :)
+1@P0TET0Z no. You can, however, see how it's made and apply the technique to your own design.
+1@Zott no problem.
+1@JonTKocz you ned to post them somewhere first. Site doesn't host pictures. Then you write . If you use Imgur, remove "s" from "https".
+1@Chancey21 yeah, it's a borderline case, but better safe than sorry. You'll notice I haven't removed the post. Can't wait to test this plane. (figure of speech. I'm not testing any entry before the deadline)
+1I've edited the part that is borderline begging for upvotes. I understand you didn't do it on purpose, but please don't use "upvote to be tagged" anymore.
+1There is no need for that, as Guardian missile can be set to lock onto ground targets using the this in combination with this.
+1@Chancey21 I'm still not sure.
+1Nice. Congratulations on three years :)
+1Btw, clickable link is [text](your link.com).
I post every plane unlisted a few times during the building so my friends can test it and suggest improvements. I also write the whole description on an unlisted version so that it can be posted just seconds after the build is uploaded.
+1There is a fix for it available. Look through HellFires comments to find it. I'm not sure if the mod post is updated too.
+1@LancasterAce why would I ask devs? Also, parts will be available when the update comes out.
+1@LancasterAce probably. USS Beast has been edited so that they can be used.
+1Old news. Unfortunately, even by removing extra characters from the file, we still can't use them.
+1@jlewisifer there's still a week. I might add another if too many entries are late.
+1@BoeyingOfficial it must be a glitch with the site. I'm seeing it too.
+1Excellent build, especially for your level. Very smooth flier, nice details, and good proportion.
+1By the way, to tag a user, put "@" in front of their username. That sends them notification about your comment. You can tag up to three users per comment, the rest won't get a notification.
I'll feature your plane so everybody can see it on the front page :)
@Chancey21 my guess is "spefy - smashes head on the keyboard".
+1@haogejiuhaoge1 I can't do a thing. I only moderate the site. You need guys with blue tags. Or post your suggestion to Uservoice. You can find the link to it under "Stuff".
+1Btw, upvote is for the flight model. This is a very stable flyer. Landing gear is a bit basic, but nice. I'm glad you have left control surfaces visible (I hate it when people cover control surfaces), but I think you should try experimenting with custom ones. And what I meant by "better, more realistic proportion" is that the fuselage is too tall. Usually, planes of this category (busyness turboprop) have nearly cylindrical or perfectly cylindrical fuselage.
+1