@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
Isn't SimplePlanes complicated in a way? In my opinion, it probably is more complicated than FO if you know what youre doing because you can't really be more flexible with what you can do with the fuselage in SP, just to give an example. I mean I know you won't really figure that out but I guess that's obvious.
Then I retract my statement about her not giving a feedback. On another note, why does it matter? You could just take it as an actual feedback and improve in the future. Why take every 'insult' or 'feedback' as some sort of a bad thing? If you get one then that means you could do better.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26. I did not mean that Pan gave feedback either. What Pan said was merely an opinion and should be seen as such. Don't confuse words from one another.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26. Pan did not even say something negative. Pan literally just said an opinion, which you thought was something negative. If you think that's some sort of an insult, I wonder what an actual negative comment would do to you.
@Default4. Check BMilan's latest reply. I'm pretty sure he already have mentioned things I meant to say. Again, as he mentioned on one of his comments, low part ≠ efficiency.
It's based on where you mostly played the game. PC allows you to use more buttons as well as shortcuts to ease the building process (e.g. right-clicking a part duplicates the whole thing including Overload changes). I'm not quite sure with mobile users but mobile allows you to build anywhere you like.
@TemporaryReplacement, Hopefully you don't mind me using the code used in this build for other creations. If I were to decide to upload, I will credit you.
@LunchBox. That's what I have in mind too. But to be honest, I'm just quite disappointed OP changed the rules because someone wants to basically reupload a plane with a different colour scheme. And no, I am not worried about it.
@Samflugzeugpanzer
I am not willing to dive into the lore too much, there's too much to read so I made it vague and easier to understand for the common user. If you meant the dates, I plan to leave it to your own imagination
@Kendog84
I'm too lazy to actually develop a ship damage model since it can be really difficult for larger, way more detailed builds. Though it's actually very decent that you come up with ways of building how to make one. I could sort of use these info for myself next time I tried to do something similar (again).
.
It's also fun to see that SP physics still works as it is lol.
@CaptainNoble
+1@126
@LoganAviation
@MitsubishiTritonMyBeloved
+1@S1lly
@DISHWASHER2005
@BRNavyPilot, correct.
+1Camouflage working so well, water doesn't reflect it properly. Awesome stuff.
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
+1Isn't SimplePlanes complicated in a way? In my opinion, it probably is more complicated than FO if you know what youre doing because you can't really be more flexible with what you can do with the fuselage in SP, just to give an example. I mean I know you won't really figure that out but I guess that's obvious.
If you consider that as harassment then Jesus, I have no more words of help for you.
+1Then I retract my statement about her not giving a feedback. On another note, why does it matter? You could just take it as an actual feedback and improve in the future. Why take every 'insult' or 'feedback' as some sort of a bad thing? If you get one then that means you could do better.
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26. I did not mean that Pan gave feedback either. What Pan said was merely an opinion and should be seen as such. Don't confuse words from one another.
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26. Pan did not even say something negative. Pan literally just said an opinion, which you thought was something negative. If you think that's some sort of an insult, I wonder what an actual negative comment would do to you.
+1No problem, I just wanted to say what my thoughts are about the matter.
+1@Default4. Check BMilan's latest reply. I'm pretty sure he already have mentioned things I meant to say. Again, as he mentioned on one of his comments, low part ≠ efficiency.
+1It's based on where you mostly played the game. PC allows you to use more buttons as well as shortcuts to ease the building process (e.g. right-clicking a part duplicates the whole thing including Overload changes). I'm not quite sure with mobile users but mobile allows you to build anywhere you like.
+1@TemporaryReplacement. Alright, I'd add you. Cheers.
+1Really interesting projects you've been working on recently. If you don't mind me asking, do you have a Discord account?
+1@TemporaryReplacement, Surely. Though if you were to try, please do tag me in a post. If ever, I could help you with suggestions.
+1Do you plan on creating surface combat-focused modified ships, as well as larger vessels in the future?
+1@TemporaryReplacement, Hopefully you don't mind me using the code used in this build for other creations. If I were to decide to upload, I will credit you.
+1@Boeig, Stating another example is not an argument. This video is way too off-topic and not even slightly related to SimplePlanes.
+1I now knight you to boatmanship.
+1@LunchBox. That's what I have in mind too. But to be honest, I'm just quite disappointed OP changed the rules because someone wants to basically reupload a plane with a different colour scheme. And no, I am not worried about it.
+1@MrCOPTY, Wasn't the focus of the challenge around Biplanes? I don't wanna be that guy but not because someone asked, doesn't mean you already should.
+1I don't really wanna join as a competitor but I wanna participate.
+1my entry
Congratulations for Gold.
+1Funky
+1not first, not pog
+1@typeZERO
Azusa's halo is a pretty beautiful imo, I actually planned to use Kisaki's but I have skill issue doing her's.
I used the vanity quote due to her EX skill animation line.
+1(Now I'm sad that I forgot to add a Peroro plushie somewhere onboard)
@Samflugzeugpanzer
+1I am not willing to dive into the lore too much, there's too much to read so I made it vague and easier to understand for the common user. If you meant the dates, I plan to leave it to your own imagination
Does this participate in the dreadnaught challenge?
+1@MrShenanigansSP
+1precisely.
Really, really nice. I like it.
+1@SPAircraftOfficial
the wheels are limited to a specific rate, which limits the maximum speed of the vehicle.
+1@Fineilldoitmyself
+1awesome, glad I helped :))
Does this have the buoyancy technique you mentioned? looks great btw.
+1@Fineilldoitmyself
+1Sure, no problem.
@Kendog84
+1I'm too lazy to actually develop a ship damage model since it can be really difficult for larger, way more detailed builds. Though it's actually very decent that you come up with ways of building how to make one. I could sort of use these info for myself next time I tried to do something similar (again).
.
It's also fun to see that SP physics still works as it is lol.
Where is Taihou
+1@Ayanon
+1Yes. That's why you should do your part, hint hint.
here before this blows up.
+1I'll try
+1@JustDragon
+1shh, we don’t talk about it
All the meme comments aside, this is awesome.
+1@Suubk27
+1Thank you :))))
@Inuyasha8215
+1Thank you, Inu :))))
@BMilan
+1Tag was requested
We should make Japanese boats sometime.
+1Pin
This is awesome. Thank you for this.
+1in addition to being indestructible, fumos also now incorporate stealth
+1@CharlesDeGaulle
+1I am interested in them, Ill try my best in the future
@CharlesDeGaulle
+1You dont know how long Bearn has been in my planned ships, 5months+ already
.
But yes, someday, I will do her.
@Vincent
+1could I ask for this craft to be a successor of this challenge?
Thank you.