@spefyjerbf
Ah, if that's the case I guess it works. I've been playing around with the speed data types a bit recently because I was trying to get the best measurement type for my bombsight, but I just found IAS works best for most purposes... Or so I believe. Excellent graphics, by the way. Always found that you make super appealing images- did you study graphics design at some point?
Very nice, although I'm not sure if GS is the right speed value to use for the last one. In my tests, I found the GS doesn't seem to work as intended- a 90 degree climb should show GS = 0, but apparently not... Something to note.
@Zanedavid
.
At 1000m this is very accurate. Expect an effective deviation of roughly maybe 10-25 m. If you look at a target at 1000m, you will probably hit that target. The bombsight automatically calculates the bombing solution according to your altitude, your speed, and the orientation of your plane. Every factor that can be accounted for has been integrated into the system.
Completely possible. Pretty easy, actually- if you use my stabilizer mechanism- a rotator with an input of clamp(PitchAngle*0.01, -1, 1), and set zeroOnDeactivate = false, then every requirement here is met.
@ThomasRoderick
.
Nah, the this is already pretty low-part count on its own, though. Plus, the new cannons don't make a good enough "smoke" effect to use as a smoke grenade.
@ThomasRoderick
.
Nah, I'd consider that "cheating" myself. I want fuelless propulsion, so I'll probably use an impactForce gun to resemble a Coffman starter.
@ThomasRoderick
.
That's the job of the starter. I haven't added it in yet, but will do in the future. Once an engine starts spinning, the rotational moment of inertia of the flywheel keeps it spinning one way.
@BogdanX
.
I'll post an unlisted post with the functions I used in this post. Having the ability to toggle it via AGs help out a ton, also I've enabled zeroOnDeactivate in order for the system to 'properly' switch off when not active.
@vcharng
.
Yep, I'm on board with @CoolPeach here. Try this particular example: Altitude-1 and Altitude - 1 yield different results. Personally, I'd say always use spaces to be safe (and consistency).
the reason things got so stacked is because of the upload system and me losing access to SP for a year
Never in your comment history or a forum post of some kind have I spotted this argument. Not really consistent, are we?
drop it lad other wise ill get mods informed on this comment
Did I break a rule? I'm just questioning how one produces 80 or so quality builds somehow, especially if you have so little time to invest in SP:
have a job I have a life and only one device I play SP on and im sorry if I hang out with friends and Live a normal teens life
I get that you've been unbanned, and probably for a credible argument about how you aren't taking parts, but I still haven't seen a proper clarification that I can comprehend. A general consensus between the community leads me to believe that there was a compelling reason to get you banned in the first place. I'm not accusing you of anything, I'm asking for clear, upfront clarification on the issue so we can all continue in peace. Surely a supposed 16 year old is capable of doing so, if I can take credit from the personal details provided on your profile. Is this too much to ask from you? I just tend to be a skeptical, especially on the Internet.
@IlikeToFlyandcrash First, some spelling... "Sight" means something drastically different from "site". As I said, I can only infer what you are trying to say if you don't use proper English conventions.
.
As an rebuttal to your nonsensical argument about how Jundroo has "copied" someone's plane and "added 2 parts"... If you have any sense of how the game works, it's pretty obvious they've change more than "adding 2 parts". Changes to a build aren't all about the part count. If you have eyes you can see that.
In addition, I've already made it pretty clear to you:
I also have no idea what you're raising an issue with. Nobody "copied" anything. Jundroo decided that a certain plane was fitting as a stock plane, so they took the basic chassis, modified it, and included it as a stock plane for all players to gain inspiration from or to play with. All of this was done with consent from the original author.
Nobody stole anything. Plus, your works of "adding 3 pieces and a different paint job" are objectively not worth cluttering the site with, to be frank with you. Not a single person has got away with simply repainting an existing build. It doesn't show any effort. If you want to know what a real "modification" looks like, check this for example. Your work shows far too little effort, especially if it isn't something original. In the example I gave you, the part count jumped some 400 parts. Your "adding of 2 parts" is just so meager and insignificant.
.
Hope this makes sense to you.
@EternalDarkness Makes good sense, although ~20 parts won't make too much of a difference. Looking forward to seeing what you come up with. Tags, if you do that sort of thing.
@Type2volkswagen
+1.
No prob, ask for help anytime.
@Galland
+1.
Well deserved feature!
@Minecraftpoweer
+1.
Haha... Glad to be the friendly neighborhood "snowflake guy".
Nice. How'd you do your bombsight?
+1@Tums
+1.
Most definitely yes, but I'll have to work out the details.
@Kimcotupan15
+1.
To avoid shell kissing set delay to smth like 0.05. I wouldn't recommend 0 sec delay anyway.
@RASEN1914
+1.
I've already done one. Check it out here.
@spefyjerbf
+1.
Much thanks for the kind words, added to my contacts. Will contact ya when I need help.
@typeZERO
+1.
Answers (respectively):
Yes, infinity (attribute in XML)
Not yet
Untested
No
Yes
@Galaxy34
+1.
Of course. Have you ever seen a modless build not work on other devices? With the new update, this will now work for everyone.
@spefyjerbf
+1.
Thanks, I often feel my stuff is slightly unpolished- been taking some inspiration from you as well!
@spefyjerbf
+1Ah, if that's the case I guess it works. I've been playing around with the speed data types a bit recently because I was trying to get the best measurement type for my bombsight, but I just found IAS works best for most purposes... Or so I believe. Excellent graphics, by the way. Always found that you make super appealing images- did you study graphics design at some point?
Very nice, although I'm not sure if GS is the right speed value to use for the last one. In my tests, I found the GS doesn't seem to work as intended- a 90 degree climb should show GS = 0, but apparently not... Something to note.
+1@11qazxc
+1.
Yup- check out my take on it here. It works pretty well!
@Kimcotupan15
+1.
Thanks! It's nothing beyond a HS Physics course, but it's still very cool to know that this can work in SP now.
@Zanedavid
+1.
At 1000m this is very accurate. Expect an effective deviation of roughly maybe 10-25 m. If you look at a target at 1000m, you will probably hit that target. The bombsight automatically calculates the bombing solution according to your altitude, your speed, and the orientation of your plane. Every factor that can be accounted for has been integrated into the system.
@LeonardoEngineering
+1.
A marvel of engineering indeed!
Pings!
+1.
@Leehopard @randomusername @Thelegitpilot13
@Dllama4 @Minecraftpoweer
Completely possible. Pretty easy, actually- if you use my stabilizer mechanism- a rotator with an input of
+1clamp(PitchAngle*0.01, -1, 1), and set zeroOnDeactivate = false, then every requirement here is met.@Thelegitpilot13
+1.
Sure, I'll release the input statement code once I release it as a build!
@Minecraftpoweer
+1.
Gah, it's nothing beyond a basic HS physics course. The hard part was typing everything right and not forgetting things.
@jamesPLANESii
+1.
Awesome job! Looks nice and polished.
@ThomasRoderick
+1.
Nah, the this is already pretty low-part count on its own, though. Plus, the new cannons don't make a good enough "smoke" effect to use as a smoke grenade.
@ThomasRoderick
+1.
Nah, I'd consider that "cheating" myself. I want fuelless propulsion, so I'll probably use an impactForce gun to resemble a Coffman starter.
@ThomasRoderick
+1.
That's the job of the starter. I haven't added it in yet, but will do in the future. Once an engine starts spinning, the rotational moment of inertia of the flywheel keeps it spinning one way.
.
+1Aha! That's why the plane blew up every time I was testing.
@robloxweponco
+1.
Read... Default, disconnect only, and none. Pretty self explanatory, don't you think?
@MrPorg137
+1.
It's just a random, arbitrarily decided way of saying 'new functions'. Nobody understands it either.
@BogdanX
+1.
I'll post an unlisted post with the functions I used in this post. Having the ability to toggle it via AGs help out a ton, also I've enabled
zeroOnDeactivatein order for the system to 'properly' switch off when not active.@WarHawk95
+1.
That's more XML, so I'll try to cover that in a future post. Stay tuned!
@Tums
+1.
No, it only is allowed to move the way as it is shown above. You can control on/off using AGs though.
@vcharng
+1.
Yep, I'm on board with @CoolPeach here. Try this particular example:
Altitude-1andAltitude - 1yield different results. Personally, I'd say always use spaces to be safe (and consistency).Possibly? Wait until 1.10. I don't expect more "new" parts to be added this patch.
+1@CruzerBlade
+1When they delete the designer and you can only use XML to build
@jamesPLANESii
+1.
Yep, I think what most people were confused about was how to enter them into the actual XML system. Just some syntax! Glad I helped.
@Minecraftpoweer @BlackhattAircraft @jamesPLANESii
+1.
Hey folks, just thought you guys might like to have this. Sorry if I bothered you!
@Minecraftpoweer Thanks!
+1Something I've wanted to work on for a while. Hopefully I'll be back to a more active status as I work on this.
+1@Natedog120705
Please do go ahead! I'd like to see how you did!
+1@DarDragon
I do recommend adding slanted mini-wings to the shell itself to give it the rifling effect and improve accuracy / stability.
+1Never in your comment history or a forum post of some kind have I spotted this argument. Not really consistent, are we?
Did I break a rule? I'm just questioning how one produces 80 or so quality builds somehow, especially if you have so little time to invest in SP:
I get that you've been unbanned, and probably for a credible argument about how you aren't taking parts, but I still haven't seen a proper clarification that I can comprehend. A general consensus between the community leads me to believe that there was a compelling reason to get you banned in the first place. I'm not accusing you of anything, I'm asking for clear, upfront clarification on the issue so we can all continue in peace. Surely a supposed 16 year old is capable of doing so, if I can take credit from the personal details provided on your profile. Is this too much to ask from you? I just tend to be a skeptical, especially on the Internet.
+1@IlikeToFlyandcrash First, some spelling... "Sight" means something drastically different from "site". As I said, I can only infer what you are trying to say if you don't use proper English conventions.
.
As an rebuttal to your nonsensical argument about how Jundroo has "copied" someone's plane and "added 2 parts"... If you have any sense of how the game works, it's pretty obvious they've change more than "adding 2 parts". Changes to a build aren't all about the part count. If you have eyes you can see that.
In addition, I've already made it pretty clear to you:
Nobody stole anything. Plus, your works of "adding 3 pieces and a different paint job" are objectively not worth cluttering the site with, to be frank with you. Not a single person has got away with simply repainting an existing build. It doesn't show any effort. If you want to know what a real "modification" looks like, check this for example. Your work shows far too little effort, especially if it isn't something original. In the example I gave you, the part count jumped some 400 parts. Your "adding of 2 parts" is just so meager and insignificant.
+1.
Hope this makes sense to you.
@IStoleYourMeme You could also go for a setup with oscillating pistons and a free rotator to create a more authentic mechanism.
+1@EternalDarkness Makes good sense, although ~20 parts won't make too much of a difference. Looking forward to seeing what you come up with. Tags, if you do that sort of thing.
+1@Brimstone
like this:
+1.
.
If it isn't http, it won't load.
@ThatOneF15Eagle There is a hidden gun that powers the mechanism.
+1@SpiritusRaptor The drum doesn't go backwards if you aren't pressing fire?
By the way, working on a concept for belt-fed.
+1@09thiccfish
*Acceleration.
Wrong spelling won't get you good attention.
+1@ColonelStriker I wasn't expecting anything until I saw screenshots of the interior and the tracks. THE TRACKSSSSS!!! The part count is insane.
+1@kshatria Reeee War Thunder gang
+1