@FlyOnTheWall Actually,
- The original design was tailless with no horisontal stabilisers. I tried adding hidden ones, but again, this does not work. I could move the CoL forward but saw no need to do that since this was not meant to fly anyways
- Setting the engine to what you described is unrealistic, this is meant to be a replica
- You cannot delete the inlets in the nose. First of all, the engines don't have enough air without them, and also it is a known fact that they work inside fuselages, that is commonly used in custom missiles for example. They also weigh nothing
@SuperSuperTheSylph that's exactly what i tried, but even very large wings (not present in the post) could not lift it or even change its trajectory when it was launched from the air. I suspect there is either a change in aerodynamics calculations at that size or the weight of this thing is just too big (i was able to get it flying at 530000 tons instead of 5300000)
Also, the explosion power of the bombs is deliberately decreased, which is why you kinda only see the rockets explode. It can be adjusted in Overload to simulate different explosive mass
@Mynameisntjeff sure! Please place your order in the Novara discord server so i dont forget about it. Also, please specify the thrust requirements and whether the TVC is 2D or 3D
@Seeras , can you please make this a successor to @DrakonDynamics 's fighter challenge? (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/ZrQ372/Modern-Fighter-Challenge-Novaran-Edition)
@Kerbango yea, i know about the text trick, but it's 2d and low-res (and on higher res the lag is abysmal). Thats an option too though, i just wanted more realism
@ThomasRoderick .. quite large, but not too much. It will probably have to be like 50% gun and 50% engine with the pilot squeezed somewhere in-between
I mean, it's not too far from some ww2 era planes (except for the firing rate, but i do want some BRRRRTT). As to what it would intercept.. things like Lockheed CL-1201 come to mind
@DrakonDynamics Hey, i messaged you in discord but you may have missed it. First, is Solara taken? Second, is there any lore behind it/which real country (if any) it is based on? thanks
@Seeras , can you please make this a successor to @AeroTactical 's challenge? (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/PC8J2e/Open-Turboprop-attack-challenge)
@Seeras , can you please make this a successor to @AeroTactical 's challenge? (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/PC8J2e/Open-Turboprop-attack-challenge)
+1@Ku thanks for the suggestions!
@Ku thanks, that's the plan :)
+2You are a very big inspiration for me!
based
+1genius
also, the adaptive engine thingy looks very cool in action
+1@cooldude321 it does, they are just hidden in the fuselage
@cooldude321 ok good (you can try with the original size too if you want)
@cooldude321 Ok, i'll count that, although this is several times smaller
@Husky12345 if you check the engines you can see that this is already done. I could set it even higher but that would be too unrealistic
@Aviators14 yep happened to me too. This should probably launched on PC, and even then i had issues...
@FlyOnTheWall Actually,
- The original design was tailless with no horisontal stabilisers. I tried adding hidden ones, but again, this does not work. I could move the CoL forward but saw no need to do that since this was not meant to fly anyways
- Setting the engine to what you described is unrealistic, this is meant to be a replica
- You cannot delete the inlets in the nose. First of all, the engines don't have enough air without them, and also it is a known fact that they work inside fuselages, that is commonly used in custom missiles for example. They also weigh nothing
@SuperSuperTheSylph that's exactly what i tried, but even very large wings (not present in the post) could not lift it or even change its trajectory when it was launched from the air. I suspect there is either a change in aerodynamics calculations at that size or the weight of this thing is just too big (i was able to get it flying at 530000 tons instead of 5300000)
+1Congrats!
@ReignSUPREME t
Note that the trust is at sea level and will naturally decrease as the altitude increases
Also, the explosion power of the bombs is deliberately decreased, which is why you kinda only see the rockets explode. It can be adjusted in Overload to simulate different explosive mass
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph first i thought of just making a balloon or something but then things got silly
+3Awesome! By the way, how did you manage to make the piston detonator work consistently? I was never able to get it right
+1great build!
@Seeras , can you please make this a successor to @MrCOPTY 's UAVchallenge? (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/cx9j9p/05-50-01-04-2025-UAV-Challenge)
+1@rorrE radar? in this economy?
+1holy hell another Ku FT banger
great work!
+1@Mynameisntjeff sure! Please place your order in the Novara discord server so i dont forget about it. Also, please specify the thrust requirements and whether the TVC is 2D or 3D
@Convex credit is appreciated but not required
@MizeaO i wonder how comfortable the pilot must feel when shooting..
@Seeras thanks!
@Seeras , can you please make this a successor to @DrakonDynamics 's fighter challenge? (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/ZrQ372/Modern-Fighter-Challenge-Novaran-Edition)
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 of course, it's all free to use
+1@Thatrando you mean UAVs like the HE LAP series or what?
+1@5cmPak38aufPzKpfwIISfl901 exactly! Btw, i made a griffon replica too
@dabestsock thanks
i will use it in my own plane soon (in fact, 3 of my last posts are all parts of it)
@laikeNB its in the description
@Kerbango yea, i know about the text trick, but it's 2d and low-res (and on higher res the lag is abysmal). Thats an option too though, i just wanted more realism
@SPsidearm oh, i can make that too. Do you have any requirements for it in mind?
@SPsidearm I already made a twin one, single probably coming soon
@ThomasRoderick .. quite large, but not too much. It will probably have to be like 50% gun and 50% engine with the pilot squeezed somewhere in-between
I mean, it's not too far from some ww2 era planes (except for the firing rate, but i do want some BRRRRTT). As to what it would intercept.. things like Lockheed CL-1201 come to mind
+1@DrakonDynamics Hey, i messaged you in discord but you may have missed it. First, is Solara taken? Second, is there any lore behind it/which real country (if any) it is based on? thanks
+1@VRCaPable sure
@AviadorArgentino thanks!
+1@Berulacraft Thanks!
@Seeras, can you please make this a successor to @AviadorArgentino 's light aircraft challenge?
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover i have not heard of the S-war, can you tell me?
@Christiant2 Hey, can you please explain what MDA means? I've been seeing it more in the past days but no clue what this is
+1@Gabriel747 Part-Efficient Aircraft, basically a replica under 96 parts
+1i forgor the minimum part count requirement
will maybe do another entry, this was fun to build
+2very cool design!
@Graingy both. The firing delay is switched to 0, i think what limits the actual firing rate is the game switching between cannons
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore thanks!
great build! I liked the idea of using a rotator mesh in the air intake