@Deepdark i have added the default wings already. This is the version with default wings. they are just shrunk to zero so you can't see them.
also, this aircraft was made using a blueprint - its fairly well accurate I think. Assuming you mean the flight model is bad, it was known to have a low roll rate, and it will obviously be terrible at low speeds.
@WaitBreadIsntAfruit kinda. Him and about 4/5 friends bought one collectively, and they all fly it, both as a group and solo as they all hold the license to it. My uncle can't anymore because he has parkinsons but still helps pay for maintenance costs and the like, and his friends still take him up in it
@Kangy I mean it's by far the best flight model I've done so far, but there are a few issues with it so I should be able to fix those for next time. There are a few bizarre issues, like a huge twr despite mostly accurate thrust and weight, so it has way better climb than the original, but imo it's one of my better flight models lmao
well
f1 car has about 1 million parts.
to model an f1 car exterior is about 150,000 parts.
to model interior is about 500,000 parts (modelling everything)
to program an f1 car is somewhere around 6 million lines of code - approaching 20 million and tending to impossibility with simpleplanes. Done multiple times.
but its almost guaranteed to work.
arduous yes, but simple no
@PakPuma75 I don't think so, it was working a couple of hours ago (admittedly before the new panel was added, but in my testing that doesnt seem to be the issue)
@Rodrigo110 he was kinda forced to act, it became a public issue.
And that's the problem with cancel culture, which you now appear to be attempting to practise on Andrew
@Mostly a few of the discord servers are now taking up a no nonsense policy on unnecessary snitching and cancel culture which is an improvement, and I think the website should start too
@Krmo top speed is tuned to about 35000ft, g pull is relatively accurate as to the maximum airframe stress (usually 1.5x the rated maximum set by the manufacturer)
code i used for control surfaces was this: clamp([control input],(-1)+(IAS/[just over max speed in m/s]),1-(IAS/[just over max speed in m/s])), which limits control rotation as speed increases, acting as an extremely rudimentary control lock or g limiter. on the rear I stacked it up a few times making some looooong codes, but you can use this if you like :)
@Krmo yah i couldn't quite get the drag down as low as I wanted it, so it's too fast at sea level and accelerates slightly too quickly with afterburner, but other than that it's actually pretty realistic
This might also be bordering on a number of rule breaks too (specifically, abusing the voting system - some might say this is begging for upvotes)
Also, I don't think inciting drama is specifically against the rules but if it was this would probably break it
T# PLEASE
+1i have never seen such a panic for a server being down as the spmp server being down.
+1@Deepdark i have added the default wings already. This is the version with default wings. they are just shrunk to zero so you can't see them.
also, this aircraft was made using a blueprint - its fairly well accurate I think. Assuming you mean the flight model is bad, it was known to have a low roll rate, and it will obviously be terrible at low speeds.
+1@Kangy thanks for feedback, I think I did it for a mix of building convenience and inexperience with the new cockpits but I'll leave them up in future
+1@Titaninfernal1
+1@X99STRIKER
@BeastHunter
@Hazerz [funny reply]
+1my guy, build stuff primarily for yourself and share with others as a secondary thought. Only build to satisfy you or stress will come fast
+1in overload, under the Bomb tab, you can add a variable called
+1firingDelay, which can be given a value in seconds. for spamming, try 0.1jeezus the cockpit oh thats very good
+1@PPLLAANNEE it hurts my brain too, if I continue building like this my plane is gonna need to come with an epilepsy warning
+1@WaitBreadIsntAfruit kinda. Him and about 4/5 friends bought one collectively, and they all fly it, both as a group and solo as they all hold the license to it. My uncle can't anymore because he has parkinsons but still helps pay for maintenance costs and the like, and his friends still take him up in it
+1this SCREAMS 'turboprop a-10' for some reason
I love it
+1@BeastHunter yes please ig
+1submarinen't
+1@SheriffHackdogMCPE ukrainian government has just confirmed it was destroyed.
+1@Kangy I mean it's by far the best flight model I've done so far, but there are a few issues with it so I should be able to fix those for next time. There are a few bizarre issues, like a huge twr despite mostly accurate thrust and weight, so it has way better climb than the original, but imo it's one of my better flight models lmao
Thanks for the praise!
+1@Xamesria27 thank you!
+1@PapaKernels i like it cuz its just happy :D
+1@Juno it is here
+1@InsertNameHere01 f1 fan?
+1@BoganBoganTheKid gonna be honest tagging jundroo won't do anything, especially given EVERYONE has suggested this at some point.
There have to be reasons they havent been implemented yet.
+1@jamesPLANESii yes, and even with panelling the exterior and interior combined is only about 200k triangles.
+1well
f1 car has about 1 million parts.
to model an f1 car exterior is about 150,000 parts.
to model interior is about 500,000 parts (modelling everything)
to program an f1 car is somewhere around 6 million lines of code - approaching 20 million and tending to impossibility with simpleplanes. Done multiple times.
but its almost guaranteed to work.
+1arduous yes, but simple no
@PakPuma75 I don't think so, it was working a couple of hours ago (admittedly before the new panel was added, but in my testing that doesnt seem to be the issue)
+1miles m.39b pleeze
+1I love the nose it looks so cool
+1it looks like its only done from camera perspectives, so unless you make a walking mech, probably not.
+1good luck and godspeed sir
+1WHAT
+1I... This is epic
Oh my holy that's insane
+1@Rodrigo110 he was kinda forced to act, it became a public issue.
+1And that's the problem with cancel culture, which you now appear to be attempting to practise on Andrew
@Sharkexen for context this is massively controversial given how long ED has served as a mod and how brilliant he has been
+1@Mostly a few of the discord servers are now taking up a no nonsense policy on unnecessary snitching and cancel culture which is an improvement, and I think the website should start too
+1Ju-88 is by far my favourite aircraft I love it
+1YOu wOuLdN't DoWnloAd aN EkToRP
+1it's the
Mother Fokker
(Also T)
+1@Vincent_
How might we go about submitting? I think part of the problem was that we didn't really know...
Also congrats on becoming mod, they definitely made the right choice
+1Holy moly
+1Love it
@Krmo top speed is tuned to about 35000ft, g pull is relatively accurate as to the maximum airframe stress (usually 1.5x the rated maximum set by the manufacturer)
+1code i used for control surfaces was this:
clamp([control input],(-1)+(IAS/[just over max speed in m/s]),1-(IAS/[just over max speed in m/s])), which limits control rotation as speed increases, acting as an extremely rudimentary control lock or g limiter. on the rear I stacked it up a few times making some looooong codes, but you can use this if you like :)@Krmo yah i couldn't quite get the drag down as low as I wanted it, so it's too fast at sea level and accelerates slightly too quickly with afterburner, but other than that it's actually pretty realistic
+1Flies really realistically too
+1Nice
+1The entire SP community
Ah sh-t, here we go again
This might also be bordering on a number of rule breaks too (specifically, abusing the voting system - some might say this is begging for upvotes)
+1Also, I don't think inciting drama is specifically against the rules but if it was this would probably break it
Next: f4u-f6f-p39-d30-p38-p47 thundercatningcobrastan corsair
+1@HellFireKoder that worked, thanks so much for the help
+1he is one of the only memes that can never die, he will live on in us
+1rest in peace legend
welcome back mate :)
+1@KUBI oh thanks :')
+1@Freerider2142 i can't find the problem, sorry. it works for me on all versions
+1legendary
+1