it depends on a couple of factors, but it basically boils down to two things:
either the link isn't supported, or the formatting is wrong.
first and foremost, what is the link you put on?
it very much depends on the context
if you're writing your own lore about a fictional aircraft you can write one accident to point out it's flaws that can possibly lead to it's reputation be crumpled or to explain the reason of improvement over the systems it has.
other than for lore or memoriam imo, it's not so great.
especially not good if it's "just for the sake of it", like hpgb said.
according to sp, builds with <300 parts are mobile friendly.
though, you're not limited by the game's performance itself, more of your device's performance.
I've always thought upvotes as a kind of rating, tbh
it's not hard to see how people constantly compare their upvote counts, it directly puts on a feeling of competitiveness and seeing a shitty build get a tonne of upvotes feel upsetting. to this day, I still dislike those who make a half-assed build and get significantly more upvotes than a guy who worked his back off just to get one thing right and get next to no upvotes relatively.
but I never really tried to make it a problem. For all I know, people just don't know me and don't want to. Who's stopping them?
so I just make things and stopped bothering about upvote counts.
@WinsWings
Well, as much as it is a tutorial for "beginners" you shouldn't mislead them into thinking gyro is the only way out.
Most beginners stay as a beginner because they only think of one solution. So it's not a good way of help to say that "no matter how, it sucks" when in reality it doesn't.
VTOL plane sucks without a gyro, no matter how you try for the balance.
This is not true.
The Vertigo is plenty good enough to fly vertically on it's own.
It is rather easy to balance a VTOL aircraft, as long as you follow the CoM rule.
Say you have two VTOL nozzles spaced to the front and back of the aircraft. Imagine the gap of these two to be the "bridge", and CoM to be a weight sitting on top of the bridge. As long as you don't offset this weight to the far front or far back of the bridge, your aircraft will stay relatively stable. This is the basic principle of VTOL flight.
Although, it is significantly harder to do this on a Lift-Fan system, so if you don't have much experience I recommend using a gyro, even if it means people will call you out as a cheater for it.
@Yeetuscheese
Sorry, but I am going to say no.
I generally don't want to touch other people's builds unless it's necessary for me, and this request to me does not seem necessary.
What I would do instead, is to recommend and help you assist with some of the troubles you're having. Here's some recommendations/advices:
I would highly recommend Walvis' Easy Afterburner Tutorial for making cool afterburners. In fact, my afterburners are a derivative of this technique.
I highly suggest looking at real-life pictures of the reference cockpit. It's pretty hard to make a good cockpit and it takes time. So be patient and trust the process.
Highly suggest changing your wing type from Wing-3 to Wing-2, as structural wings are much stronger in structure than regular primary wings. If you don't know how, you need to activate "Overload" mod first. It's built in to your application, so all you need to do is go to "Mods" and activate it. Then in designer, you can press the button with a </> sign on it. Change partType from Wing-3 to Wing-2, and reconnect.
I'm sorry for rejecting your request. I know building planes can be pretty taxing mentally, but you would be better off learning the skills than having to rely on other people to do so.
Have a great rest of your day!
Inspired By: @Jundroo, @PUMPKINSIDD
Based off of: Boeing F-15E Strike Eagle
Main Reference: Wasp, Pigpen, Hellkeska
I had the idea to make a Jundroo styled Eagle.
just a quick build I guess, SP2 is coming out this year so this might become obsolete really fast
So... You have uncovered our true purpose.
Hahaha... Historians really thought we were just yet another former Dutch colony... No, we're much more than that!
Those 300 years... The tortures and hardships... They were all just a facade to make us seem weak, and exploitable. But once the first phase was deemed a success, we knew that what we had at hand, was a winner. The world, will be ours.
btw, mendoan tempe boleh dicoba, pake sambel enak loh
@AeroSultan
I highly recommend the shithole that is twitter if you want to keep acting like an ass
trust me, it's a really fun community to be an ass in
other than that, calm down brother
don't be another victim of the dunning kruger effect
odd. That's not supposed to happen.
if you have SP, you can go to the web and click on the "Download" button. It'd open SP and download the craft right then and there.
Perhaps you have desktop view on?
yknow
my name is not exactly creative.
so he might be referencing to something else other than me?
I mean for god's sake the post linked to a completely different interest. Dare I say... Almost childish.
just my general name for anything really, Zerø.
the origin of it is not that complex. when I made it I was really into MMZ, so I just added spice to the word "Zero".
I wish I had more explanation for more epic reasons(!), but nope.
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread
I'm surprised you've gone this far without knowing how to ft
the simple way to start learning ft is through the official guides by WNP himself, it may be slightly outdated but it explains nearly everything in a very simple manner for beginners.
but either way, yes, that's the baseline of the code.
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread
sorry, I get easily annoyed sometimes
I shouldn't expect everyone to be at the same level as I am
either way, the nozzle doesn't move it's thrust directions, only converging and diverging as a way to concentrate the air coming out of the engine to give it slightly more power
the petals move, the base of the nozzle itself doesn't is what I'm saying
and yes, that's the entire code. you can modify it however you want, make it only move in certain conditions, and make it move in a certain way corresponding to the input, but other than that, the baseline code is just that.
@RealMicroZackSP
trying to act real tough now, are you?
I do agree that I was pretty aggressive, but never did I say I hate you or anything. T'was but a simple question. You're getting the attention you asked for and was proven wrong in a positive light, are you happy now? Because you should be.
I also want to add the fact that you pointing out who would possibly hate you in public does sound very attention seeking. Saying "this guy probably hates me" in a public space open in front of everyone makes you look like you're only asking it even further.
taking "I'm spiked" to the next level
+1it depends on a couple of factors, but it basically boils down to two things:
either the link isn't supported, or the formatting is wrong.
first and foremost, what is the link you put on?
it very much depends on the context
+1if you're writing your own lore about a fictional aircraft you can write one accident to point out it's flaws that can possibly lead to it's reputation be crumpled or to explain the reason of improvement over the systems it has.
other than for lore or memoriam imo, it's not so great.
especially not good if it's "just for the sake of it", like hpgb said.
according to sp, builds with <300 parts are mobile friendly.
though, you're not limited by the game's performance itself, more of your device's performance.
I've always thought upvotes as a kind of rating, tbh
+6it's not hard to see how people constantly compare their upvote counts, it directly puts on a feeling of competitiveness and seeing a shitty build get a tonne of upvotes feel upsetting. to this day, I still dislike those who make a half-assed build and get significantly more upvotes than a guy who worked his back off just to get one thing right and get next to no upvotes relatively.
but I never really tried to make it a problem. For all I know, people just don't know me and don't want to. Who's stopping them?
so I just make things and stopped bothering about upvote counts.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1I... have not updated the xml.
@WinsWings
Well, as much as it is a tutorial for "beginners" you shouldn't mislead them into thinking gyro is the only way out.
Most beginners stay as a beginner because they only think of one solution. So it's not a good way of help to say that "no matter how, it sucks" when in reality it doesn't.
This is not true.
The Vertigo is plenty good enough to fly vertically on it's own.
It is rather easy to balance a VTOL aircraft, as long as you follow the CoM rule.
Say you have two VTOL nozzles spaced to the front and back of the aircraft. Imagine the gap of these two to be the "bridge", and CoM to be a weight sitting on top of the bridge. As long as you don't offset this weight to the far front or far back of the bridge, your aircraft will stay relatively stable. This is the basic principle of VTOL flight.
Although, it is significantly harder to do this on a Lift-Fan system, so if you don't have much experience I recommend using a gyro, even if it means people will call you out as a cheater for it.
@SDmak
don't ask me
I myself am still figuring when
@Yeetuscheese
Sorry, but I am going to say no.
I generally don't want to touch other people's builds unless it's necessary for me, and this request to me does not seem necessary.
What I would do instead, is to recommend and help you assist with some of the troubles you're having. Here's some recommendations/advices:
I'm sorry for rejecting your request. I know building planes can be pretty taxing mentally, but you would be better off learning the skills than having to rely on other people to do so.
Have a great rest of your day!
Author's Notes
Inspired By: @Jundroo, @PUMPKINSIDD
Based off of: Boeing F-15E Strike Eagle
Main Reference: Wasp, Pigpen, Hellkeska
I had the idea to make a Jundroo styled Eagle.
just a quick build I guess, SP2 is coming out this year so this might become obsolete really fast
@Pnut
+1lebih enak lagi menurutku malem malem makan ayam geprek pake es teh
tidak terbandingkan
@YarisSedan
+2apalagi nambah sambel ijo
beuh tidak diragukan lagi wuenak sangat
So... You have uncovered our true purpose.
+2Hahaha... Historians really thought we were just yet another former Dutch colony... No, we're much more than that!
Those 300 years... The tortures and hardships... They were all just a facade to make us seem weak, and exploitable. But once the first phase was deemed a success, we knew that what we had at hand, was a winner.
The world, will be ours.
btw, mendoan tempe boleh dicoba, pake sambel enak loh
@Rayyan6362
yeah, sup?
w liat komen isinya indo
melu
you have no idea the things I'm capable of doing
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1planning on redoing them, just because their base airframe has improved so much compared to the previous frame
omg tiranei!!!!!!
taek dwown junro moderstoes nouw!!!!
@AeroSultan
+11I highly recommend the shithole that is twitter if you want to keep acting like an ass
trust me, it's a really fun community to be an ass in
other than that, calm down brother
don't be another victim of the dunning kruger effect
we need this for sp2
+4jundroo devs take note
@TheFlyingGoose
not really?
it's just the game trying to force it back to normal values
some parts actually do this
the game doesn't like you putting a value higher than maximum for certain parts so it resets whenever you reload it
odd. That's not supposed to happen.
if you have SP, you can go to the web and click on the "Download" button. It'd open SP and download the craft right then and there.
Perhaps you have desktop view on?
interesting
+1yknow
+1my name is not exactly creative.
so he might be referencing to something else other than me?
I mean for god's sake the post linked to a completely different interest. Dare I say... Almost childish.
@jamalitothetostito
+1disgusting (I was the maintenance crew)
I like this.
+1just my general name for anything really, Zerø.
+2the origin of it is not that complex. when I made it I was really into MMZ, so I just added spice to the word "Zero".
I wish I had more explanation for more epic reasons(!), but nope.
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread
I'm surprised you've gone this far without knowing how to ft
the simple way to start learning ft is through the official guides by WNP himself, it may be slightly outdated but it explains nearly everything in a very simple manner for beginners.
but either way, yes, that's the baseline of the code.
@ShinyGemsBro
fair
@ShinyGemsBro
there's a reason why I made a lo-part version
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1@Pnut
@Calliope
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread
sorry, I get easily annoyed sometimes
I shouldn't expect everyone to be at the same level as I am
either way, the nozzle doesn't move it's thrust directions, only converging and diverging as a way to concentrate the air coming out of the engine to give it slightly more power
the petals move, the base of the nozzle itself doesn't is what I'm saying
and yes, that's the entire code. you can modify it however you want, make it only move in certain conditions, and make it move in a certain way corresponding to the input, but other than that, the baseline code is just that.
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread
what am I supposed to answer with?
fuckin, just nozzle?
I thought "no TVC" was clear enough
@LunarEclipseSP
+1it looks out of shape.
oh god what is that front profile
+1@ShirakamiShimada
+1professionals
have standards
@tonplam356
+2sure as hell you don't have any ideas
I'm going to be bloody honest it looks bland
out of all
+2why pink
bro this is some goofy ahh livery
damn
bro left and came back casually
people seem to misconcept that the Su-33 has TVC
it doesn't.
also for canards, I don't really do anything else except putting a variant of:
GS>1?AngleOfAttack/(RotatorRange):0
since that's what canards pretty much only do on real-life flankers
+1wow
+4how I couldn't care less
awesome.
+1wish I could do this
heresy
reporting this to the mods
imagine being a 2 yaer old smh
interesting.
+1god I wish I had the patience and device to do this
@RealMicroZackSP
trying to act real tough now, are you?
I do agree that I was pretty aggressive, but never did I say I hate you or anything. T'was but a simple question. You're getting the attention you asked for and was proven wrong in a positive light, are you happy now? Because you should be.
I also want to add the fact that you pointing out who would possibly hate you in public does sound very attention seeking. Saying "this guy probably hates me" in a public space open in front of everyone makes you look like you're only asking it even further.
@RealMicroZackSP
exactly what I'm saying.