I don't really understand how 3D printer works, but what I do know is that it is very much possible. In the 1.5 update trailer, they showed an SR-71 and the Pigpen built in game that is 3D printed. And that was like 5 years ago.
None.
With guns, that is. Because gun bullets does 0 damage whatsoever to the bridge.
With cannons though, it's different. Depending on the caliber, ammo type, explosive or not, it can take down the bridge in maybe 1-10 bullets. Again, depends.
Maybe this was changed, Idk. I never tested it again.
@Walvis
honestly, a B-71 would be pretty cool!
the Americans can still have a bomber the soviets can't reach, and it carries a very similar mission to the XB-70. Although, I kinda doubt that it'd last long enough.
as an android user that can't have 420+ part counts on a single sandbox world, I feel this. Although thanks to the new update, we can enjoy little details that the high part count planes used to exclusively have.
@Kangy
Well, the thing is, you can turn the FCS off. And you don't just have to break AoA for a PSM, overruddering also causes PSM.
And, even for an F-22, I can hardly believe that it cannot regain control after something like a Cobra. I mean aircrafts that doesn't have TVC like the Su-27 and MiG-29 can regain control after a cobra. Why not the Raptor?
I have some but since I can't cram em all in one message I'm not going to say it all.
First one is a Heatseeking fire-and-forget medium range AA missile. The Fox Code can be "Fox 2".
no.
well, it depends I guess.
HMDS has this thing right smack in the center of it called "Boresight", and as I've said it shows the centerpoint of the HMD, aka what you are directly looking at.
most aircrafts have this to just show where their pilots are looking and also to guide sensors of the aircraft on where to look, but there is one exception where this boresight is a gunsight, and it is on the AH-64 Apache.
unlike a fighter's gun where it is fixed in place, the M203 of the Apache sits as a turret under the helo, and can be slaved towards the boresight, making it the only gunsight ever in an HMDS (unless I missed another aircraft.)
@Monarchii
I make fighters.
You can nab em off mine lol.
also protip, I actually have a method to make ai fight better
just put an inert missile and watch the magic work
hey, Zerø here
as a person who's been making PEAs and by proximity knowing the LPA's ruleset, I have to regretfully inform you that this is neither an LPA or a PEA.
PEAs are required to have less than 7 part wings. This is true due to SP's AI spawning behaviour. In SP, AI aircrafts can only truly be spawned if it's under 96 parts and under 7 wing parts.
This, by proximity also applies to the LPA ruleset. Furthermore, LPAs are also reduced to part count limit of 50 and performance cost up to 350 with leeway of 750 if 350 is not possible. On top of which, an LPA must be a fictional aircraft.
Though this aircraft does have less than 750 Perf.Cost, this aircraft does not accomplish the other 2 ruleset. Which means this aircraft cannot be classified as an LPA.
also shameless plug but I've already made a PEA MiG-31 so check it out if you wanna lol
@kismit
no, at least yours had a great cinematic teaser
your hud editing skills are also much better than I was doing mine
honestly looking at it now, I'm amazed
@F8boa
For the time being, that'll be a negative.
Considering how this aircraft had already brought my device to it's near limit, adding more features, especially the more complicated ones will be a bit too taxing for even my Redmi Note 13.
If you want however, feel free to add it yourself! Just be sure to credit by either leaving the Auto-Credit on, or by leaving my name somewhere in the description. Just don't claim it as your own self-made creation.
@F16xl
but like...
...politics doesn't have to be endorsing a side?
I'm pretty sure you're still endorsing people to play into the real political world, so I just think that's not the biggest issue here
the site constitutes mobile friendly as being below 300 parts, so honestly it's not essential, given how you can also save part counts with being conservative with your glass fuselage.
imho, you should only really use 1 block canopy parts when you're pushing part efficiency to it's near limit or when you're really lazy.
you didn't read the faq didn't you?
Point A: Will SP2 release in mobile too?
I don't think you realize that mobile users makes up significant amount of playerbase. If Jundroo stopped mobile support entirely, they would lose huge amounts of playerbase.
The answer is yes.
Point B: Will devs please actually update the game?
As if the last 12 updates wasn't an update. SimplePlanes has come a long way ever since it's initially released, and the fact that you're not appreciating what the devs had accomplished over the course of 9 or so years is in itself a moral crime.
Also, 1000 parts is a lot of parts. And though SimplePlanes is simple to learn, it isn't simple for your system (especially lower ends) to simulate nearly every part present on one's builds. You can't really force the devs on that one.
Point C: Screens on cockpits and Multifunctional Display?
Please watch the trailer.
Point D: Please add mobile mod support
Please stop whining about it. We're just sick of it at this point.
@Randomplayer
honestly, just make good stuff.
people tend to like it alot when you make realistic things, replicas that looks like the actual thing, or vr stuff that looks genuine (in other words just put a bunch of features in)
I don't really understand how 3D printer works, but what I do know is that it is very much possible. In the 1.5 update trailer, they showed an SR-71 and the Pigpen built in game that is 3D printed. And that was like 5 years ago.
+2None.
+2With guns, that is. Because gun bullets does 0 damage whatsoever to the bridge.
With cannons though, it's different. Depending on the caliber, ammo type, explosive or not, it can take down the bridge in maybe 1-10 bullets. Again, depends.
Maybe this was changed, Idk. I never tested it again.
This... Not gonna lie, is cringe.
+2Yes. In order to get a fast missile, you have to put maxForwardThrustForce. Note that numbers have to be beyond 1000 or it'll just be too slow.
+2I don't think so.
+2
+2throttleResponse.make the number higher, it'll have faster acceleration.
make the number lower, it'll have slower acceleration.
@parkrangerjerry
+2nice suggestion.
one small issue.
it's a replica.
@Walvis
+2honestly, a B-71 would be pretty cool!
the Americans can still have a bomber the soviets can't reach, and it carries a very similar mission to the XB-70. Although, I kinda doubt that it'd last long enough.
Idk, I can't really help on what's going on if I don't know the details, so can you mention me on the unlisted post of the craft?
+2as an android user that can't have 420+ part counts on a single sandbox world, I feel this. Although thanks to the new update, we can enjoy little details that the high part count planes used to exclusively have.
+2fun fact:
+2you can link stuff like this
how?
simple you do this:
[text here](hahalinkgobrr)@Kangy
+2Well, the thing is, you can turn the FCS off. And you don't just have to break AoA for a PSM, overruddering also causes PSM.
And, even for an F-22, I can hardly believe that it cannot regain control after something like a Cobra. I mean aircrafts that doesn't have TVC like the Su-27 and MiG-29 can regain control after a cobra. Why not the Raptor?
I have some but since I can't cram em all in one message I'm not going to say it all.
+2First one is a Heatseeking fire-and-forget medium range AA missile. The Fox Code can be "Fox 2".
interesting.
+1hoo
+1that'd have to do with SP itself more than the site
+1SP can't take gifs for shite
no.
+1well, it depends I guess.
HMDS has this thing right smack in the center of it called "Boresight", and as I've said it shows the centerpoint of the HMD, aka what you are directly looking at.
most aircrafts have this to just show where their pilots are looking and also to guide sensors of the aircraft on where to look, but there is one exception where this boresight is a gunsight, and it is on the AH-64 Apache.
unlike a fighter's gun where it is fixed in place, the M203 of the Apache sits as a turret under the helo, and can be slaved towards the boresight, making it the only gunsight ever in an HMDS (unless I missed another aircraft.)
@Monarchii
+1I make fighters.
You can nab em off mine lol.
also protip, I actually have a method to make ai fight better
just put an inert missile and watch the magic work
hey mom look it's me I'm famous now
+1hey, Zerø here
+1as a person who's been making PEAs and by proximity knowing the LPA's ruleset, I have to regretfully inform you that this is neither an LPA or a PEA.
PEAs are required to have less than 7 part wings. This is true due to SP's AI spawning behaviour. In SP, AI aircrafts can only truly be spawned if it's under 96 parts and under 7 wing parts.
This, by proximity also applies to the LPA ruleset. Furthermore, LPAs are also reduced to part count limit of 50 and performance cost up to 350 with leeway of 750 if 350 is not possible. On top of which, an LPA must be a fictional aircraft.
Though this aircraft does have less than 750 Perf.Cost, this aircraft does not accomplish the other 2 ruleset. Which means this aircraft cannot be classified as an LPA.
also shameless plug but I've already made a PEA MiG-31 so check it out if you wanna lol
@SPsidearm
+1can't a man have his favorite aircraft recreated?
@kismit
+1no, at least yours had a great cinematic teaser
your hud editing skills are also much better than I was doing mine
honestly looking at it now, I'm amazed
@F8boa
+1For the time being, that'll be a negative.
Considering how this aircraft had already brought my device to it's near limit, adding more features, especially the more complicated ones will be a bit too taxing for even my Redmi Note 13.
If you want however, feel free to add it yourself! Just be sure to credit by either leaving the Auto-Credit on, or by leaving my name somewhere in the description. Just don't claim it as your own self-made creation.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1yoooo
front looks good
+1backside not so much
specifically the engine compartment being too small
I'm not gonna lie I wish it has more motif than just マウスちゃん on the maus-tank
+1other than that, epique
@IQinventory
+1see for yourself. it's better to explain it in images.
wrong wing pylon placement
+1though it's kinda hard to do one so I'll let it pass Ig
@F16xl
+1but like...
...politics doesn't have to be endorsing a side?
I'm pretty sure you're still endorsing people to play into the real political world, so I just think that's not the biggest issue here
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1yeah I found out that a while ago
wah
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1I for my life cannot find any specifications about any of the rockets or the bombs lmao
the blurred text concerns me
+1soooo
+1where's the archiver dude again?
@Ashdenpaw1
+1here's a question
why are you looking for money in the sp site anyway?
maybe try not to be so money-eyed when you think of upvotes
the site constitutes mobile friendly as being below 300 parts, so honestly it's not essential, given how you can also save part counts with being conservative with your glass fuselage.
+1imho, you should only really use 1 block canopy parts when you're pushing part efficiency to it's near limit or when you're really lazy.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1he decided to be alive again
imgbb ntah kenapa ngehapus gambar gambar lama, cuma paling ngebug
+1selain itu aku masih pake, aman kok skrg (ya gw telat gw tau)
@Graingy
+1lmfao why is this the first thing I see as I scroll down
@Monarchii
+1don't worry, I get that too with my PEAs sometimes xd
oh shit chii's here
+1how are ya? great build as always btw
@PrussianAirlines
+1yes, and no.
Can I? Definitely.
Will I? Not really.
phrog
+1you didn't read the faq didn't you?
+1Point A: Will SP2 release in mobile too?
I don't think you realize that mobile users makes up significant amount of playerbase. If Jundroo stopped mobile support entirely, they would lose huge amounts of playerbase.
The answer is yes.
Point B: Will devs please actually update the game?
As if the last 12 updates wasn't an update. SimplePlanes has come a long way ever since it's initially released, and the fact that you're not appreciating what the devs had accomplished over the course of 9 or so years is in itself a moral crime.
Also, 1000 parts is a lot of parts. And though SimplePlanes is simple to learn, it isn't simple for your system (especially lower ends) to simulate nearly every part present on one's builds. You can't really force the devs on that one.
Point C: Screens on cockpits and Multifunctional Display?
Please watch the trailer.
Point D: Please add mobile mod support
Please stop whining about it. We're just sick of it at this point.
I remember this thing
+1@Realturtlecat
+1ok.
oh so that's why
+1honestly the gc has been real quiet without you lmao
take your time
+1nobody's gonna push you to make new stuff constantly
honestly this is the same kind of stupid shit I pulled when I complained 'why is my t10 not curateable'
+1I was fucking stupid
@Randomplayer
+1honestly, just make good stuff.
people tend to like it alot when you make realistic things, replicas that looks like the actual thing, or vr stuff that looks genuine (in other words just put a bunch of features in)