First of all, collect data. Get to know your aircraft first and how much speed does it starts to stall. Then get a beacon light or a text.
If you get a beacon light, use this: GearDown ? 0 : (IAS<(whatever speed it was)). Haven't actually tested it yet, but I'm sure it'll work.
If you get a text, type this: {GearDown ? "(put fcs ready or smth you want here)" : (IAS<again, whatever speed it was> ? "STALL" : "(smth you want here)}. Again, haven't actually tested it, but it revolves around speed.
Damage part indicator is possible, but it is way beyond my reach.
Again possible, but beyond my reach.
Currently unable. The only way for a parking brake is to just hold down the brake until the day you die or restart the sandbox.
Autopilots are pretty hard to do. The only thing I could think off is the PitchRate/40, and trim up input. While yes, it is possible with gyro, but gyro doesn't let you turn. Well, at least that's my impression after using it for once and never again.
I've tried with hooks, it simply does not work. Dunno about chutes though. Probably the same, since they use groups instead of actual inputs. And these "custom AGs" are not actually Activation Groups. It's just a custom input.
Still one more issue.
Thrust to weight.
Due to the huge amount lf 19.59 T/W ratio, I cannot accept this one either.
Please read the rules more carefully.
I am losing creativity and smartness, that is fact.
and by that, I'm losing creativity and smartness trying to tell the person that something is very wrong about them.
@Bryan5
Yeah, no Sonic Boom and Sound Barriers are not the same.
Sonic Boom is a loud bang created by an object traveling at mach speed.
Simply put:
Sonic Boom is audio, while Sound Barrier is visual.
This is truly the ultimate suggestion forum.
Mobile SP sucked. Alot. I understand that it is caused by technical issues, but we need these things. Not all people are rich, y'know.
Also we need IR stuff. I've been asking this for a long time.
@Bryan5
that's not what he mentioned. He mentioned a moving gunsight.
Speaking of the moving gunsight, the cannon has a radar gunsight. Just realized yesterday
I don't really understand how 3D printer works, but what I do know is that it is very much possible. In the 1.5 update trailer, they showed an SR-71 and the Pigpen built in game that is 3D printed. And that was like 5 years ago.
None.
With guns, that is. Because gun bullets does 0 damage whatsoever to the bridge.
With cannons though, it's different. Depending on the caliber, ammo type, explosive or not, it can take down the bridge in maybe 1-10 bullets. Again, depends.
Maybe this was changed, Idk. I never tested it again.
@Walvis
honestly, a B-71 would be pretty cool!
the Americans can still have a bomber the soviets can't reach, and it carries a very similar mission to the XB-70. Although, I kinda doubt that it'd last long enough.
as an android user that can't have 420+ part counts on a single sandbox world, I feel this. Although thanks to the new update, we can enjoy little details that the high part count planes used to exclusively have.
@Kangy
Well, the thing is, you can turn the FCS off. And you don't just have to break AoA for a PSM, overruddering also causes PSM.
And, even for an F-22, I can hardly believe that it cannot regain control after something like a Cobra. I mean aircrafts that doesn't have TVC like the Su-27 and MiG-29 can regain control after a cobra. Why not the Raptor?
I have some but since I can't cram em all in one message I'm not going to say it all.
First one is a Heatseeking fire-and-forget medium range AA missile. The Fox Code can be "Fox 2".
@TheCommentaryGuy
if we're going there, I might as well say that the whole landing gear assembly is innacurate
but I won't, landing gears are a pain in the arse to figure out anyway and it's like a really slight oversight so I won't bother to mention it
if I may, I'm going to add a little bit of input on details you may have missed for the F-15J, just because I'm a little goober that can't go a little away without the urge to judge the accuracy of an f15 modelling so uh, I'm sorry in advance
the F-15J had a symmetrical antenna on both of the tail, this one didn't (understandably so)
no wing camber but understandable
front antenna close to the radome actually needed to be taller
bit of a wrong nozzle model but good lord I can understand why you wouldn't want to model it
otherwise this aircraft is very epique this one actually made me realize the protrusion at the back of the F-15 was actually longer for the J than the C
got question, do mobile players get a chance?
I'm not expecting it, but it would be nice for mobile players to have a bit of look at how the game would perform.
Ayo, congrats my dude!
+2Keep it up, only 15k more to go!
without. It looks less draggy, and I like it a lot.
+2@idontknow8b
+2fuselage cuts exist.
it already kind of existed. It has flaws, but it's good enough.
+2- Check out this
- First of all, collect data. Get to know your aircraft first and how much speed does it starts to stall. Then get a beacon light or a text.
- If you get a beacon light, use this: GearDown ? 0 : (IAS<(whatever speed it was)). Haven't actually tested it yet, but I'm sure it'll work.
- If you get a text, type this: {GearDown ? "(put fcs ready or smth you want here)" : (IAS<again, whatever speed it was> ? "STALL" : "(smth you want here)}. Again, haven't actually tested it, but it revolves around speed.
- Damage part indicator is possible, but it is way beyond my reach.
- Again possible, but beyond my reach.
- Currently unable. The only way for a parking brake is to just hold down the brake until the day you die or restart the sandbox.
- Autopilots are pretty hard to do. The only thing I could think off is the PitchRate/40, and trim up input. While yes, it is possible with gyro, but gyro doesn't let you turn. Well, at least that's my impression after using it for once and never again.
+2@WolfHunter9111
+2more like the F-15 ACTIVE, pretty good.
Did you check if the canards have wingPhysicsEnabled true?
+2I've tried with hooks, it simply does not work. Dunno about chutes though. Probably the same, since they use groups instead of actual inputs. And these "custom AGs" are not actually Activation Groups. It's just a custom input.
+2Still one more issue.
+2Thrust to weight.
Due to the huge amount lf 19.59 T/W ratio, I cannot accept this one either.
Please read the rules more carefully.
:O
+2Right after my Typhoon, yes!
I'd like a tag when finished, please. Just in case I missed my Jetstream. This will be cool.
simply insert this:
+2
Read through all of it this time, and...
+2Yeah, definitely sounded like a 9 year old.
unfortunately, mp is disabled due to the complex codes, so complicated that I heard the devs need to rewrite the codes again just to get mp working.
+2@X99STRIKER
+2then in that case, would you care to form a coup with me?
Why does simpleplane.com always unshown the image just for this guy lmao, every other it works fine
+2Well, it makes the connection between fuselage smoother. Perfect for nose cones, custom missile nose cones, and much more.
+2I am losing creativity and smartness, that is fact.
+2and by that, I'm losing creativity and smartness trying to tell the person that something is very wrong about them.
F-15J has a conformal fuel tank?
...Ok.
+2mm
B O A T
jokes aside, it's pretty cool, ngl
+2@Bryan5
+2Yeah, no Sonic Boom and Sound Barriers are not the same.
Sonic Boom is a loud bang created by an object traveling at mach speed.
Simply put:
Sonic Boom is audio, while Sound Barrier is visual.
This is truly the ultimate suggestion forum.
+2Mobile SP sucked. Alot. I understand that it is caused by technical issues, but we need these things. Not all people are rich, y'know.
Also we need IR stuff. I've been asking this for a long time.
@Dash8Q400
+2have you tried again one more time? it's sometimes a bug in the fine tuner.
@Bryan5
+2that's not what he mentioned. He mentioned a moving gunsight.
Speaking of the moving gunsight, the cannon has a radar gunsight. Just realized yesterday
t a n k b o a t
+2recommend checking out this video
+2in the InputController tab, create "zeroOnDeactivate" and change the value to "true", should very much work.
+2I don't really understand how 3D printer works, but what I do know is that it is very much possible. In the 1.5 update trailer, they showed an SR-71 and the Pigpen built in game that is 3D printed. And that was like 5 years ago.
+2None.
+2With guns, that is. Because gun bullets does 0 damage whatsoever to the bridge.
With cannons though, it's different. Depending on the caliber, ammo type, explosive or not, it can take down the bridge in maybe 1-10 bullets. Again, depends.
Maybe this was changed, Idk. I never tested it again.
This... Not gonna lie, is cringe.
+2I don't think so.
+2
+2throttleResponse.make the number higher, it'll have faster acceleration.
make the number lower, it'll have slower acceleration.
@parkrangerjerry
+2nice suggestion.
one small issue.
it's a replica.
@Walvis
+2honestly, a B-71 would be pretty cool!
the Americans can still have a bomber the soviets can't reach, and it carries a very similar mission to the XB-70. Although, I kinda doubt that it'd last long enough.
Idk, I can't really help on what's going on if I don't know the details, so can you mention me on the unlisted post of the craft?
+2as an android user that can't have 420+ part counts on a single sandbox world, I feel this. Although thanks to the new update, we can enjoy little details that the high part count planes used to exclusively have.
+2fun fact:
+2you can link stuff like this
how?
simple you do this:
[text here](hahalinkgobrr)@Kangy
+2Well, the thing is, you can turn the FCS off. And you don't just have to break AoA for a PSM, overruddering also causes PSM.
And, even for an F-22, I can hardly believe that it cannot regain control after something like a Cobra. I mean aircrafts that doesn't have TVC like the Su-27 and MiG-29 can regain control after a cobra. Why not the Raptor?
I have some but since I can't cram em all in one message I'm not going to say it all.
+2First one is a Heatseeking fire-and-forget medium range AA missile. The Fox Code can be "Fox 2".
@Cerdd
+1kind of a krill issu....
@Cerdd
+1omg so rude!!! block u now!!!!
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1@froge
peak
+1@TheCommentaryGuy
+1if we're going there, I might as well say that the whole landing gear assembly is innacurate
but I won't, landing gears are a pain in the arse to figure out anyway and it's like a really slight oversight so I won't bother to mention it
if I may, I'm going to add a little bit of input on details you may have missed for the F-15J, just because I'm a little goober that can't go a little away without the urge to judge the accuracy of an f15 modelling so uh, I'm sorry in advance
+1the F-15J had a symmetrical antenna on both of the tail, this one didn't (understandably so)
no wing camber but understandable
front antenna close to the radome actually needed to be taller
bit of a wrong nozzle model but good lord I can understand why you wouldn't want to model it
otherwise this aircraft is very epique
this one actually made me realize the protrusion at the back of the F-15 was actually longer for the J than the C
@IMCI
+1dm gw, kirim link invit di dm gw.
@IMCI
+1beuh
punya discord kg? gw males suruh nyebarin nomor disini
@IMCI
+1masuk grup spid gk?
nomr w dsitu
got question, do mobile players get a chance?
+1I'm not expecting it, but it would be nice for mobile players to have a bit of look at how the game would perform.
I'd like a challenge
+1but I'm busy with another thing and I can't be bothered with making a project that is months due of work
@IFVuser
+1that's not almost that's half