Hmm...
OHHHH, you mean the "veering to the side" thing that tends to happen to custom gears?
Well, for that, you can go to the settings, enable manual traction, and reduce the sideways traction. Although the "veering" still exists, it wouldn't be as strong as it was before. But, decreasing this also reduces your tire grip in turning.
I recommend tuning it into around 50-70. Going too low will cause the tire to lose grip significantly, causing the ability to drift like a drunk man if you don't countersteer immediately after turning.
@JamTheProtogen
Not too much... And yeah, it does go crazy, what do you expect?
Ok, but for real, if you don't want to always spin out of control, put this:
Activate1 ? Pitch*0.5 : Pitch
Standing here, I realize:
You were just like me trying to make history.
But who's to judge the right from wrong?
When our guard is down I think we'll both agree that:
Violence breeds violence.
But in the end it has to be this way!
I've carved my own path, you've followed your wrath,
but maybe we're both the same.
The world has turned, so many had burned,
but nobody is to blame!
Yet staring across this barren wasted land, I feel new life will be born beneath the blood stained sand!
Beneath the blood stained sand!
ahh yes it's always gamers who complains about fps ffs it's a building game, a simple one, why would you want 120 fps?
furthermore, more fps means more processing, which means more lag so that means the low end devices won't even be able to experience SP at even 60 fps, it doesn't help
The explosions in this game is just... Weird. Sometimes one part explodes and just damages the nearby part sometimes leaving a big gap, and the other times it just blows you into pieces, no questions.
The missile itself needs alot of rework to make it at least semi-realistic. Like:
Finite fuel. There's already an option for that, but the missile just dies after fuel goes out.
proxy as standard option.
Active Radar Guided needs to go to "pitbull" in order to track it's target by it's own. Meaning it acts as a semi-active before a certain range, and goes active when it reaches a certain range.
Faster lock time.
Able to collect data of a Missile's position. For RWRs and stuff. Just generally increase SA.
I once made a challenge and I made the rules a bit too strict. This one is definitely a worse case than mine.
rule complaints:
1. You want high quality builds or nah? If yea, that 70 part requirement is not gonna get you anywhere. Even my simple MiG-29 is at a staggering 95 parts. Hell, my actual good simple build, F-14B AND Su-33 is at 128 (F-14) and 181 (Su-33) parts. Too strict. Lag issues? Play at low physics.
2. Not everyone knows how to make that, you know. Too strict.
3. I'm assuming "good armor" means it can withstand a blast attack, which is impossible with such low parts. Extremely, impossibly strict.
4. How do you even make shields that functions like an actual shield? Impossible to do.
5. Not possible. If a part collided with another part, either both will be utterly destroyed and blow you with your enemies up, or anticlimactically damage your craft with the enemy craft. Impossible to do.
6. No complaints about rule 6.
7. Again, not everyone knows how to do that. Too strict.
8. While this is plausible, it's very hard to pull off. Not saying it's impossible, but it ain't easy in any way.
Deadline's too short. 23rd of April is long enough? Ha! Think again! One week ain't enough my dude. An acceptable challenge deadline is approximately 3+ weeks from the day it was started. A good deadline time is around a month after the challenge started.
From what I've heard, Ukrainian-Russian conflict is ended in Ukrainian victory. Anyhow, it's best to not talk about the conflict.
@OrderlyHippo
Just a heads up, it's not really good... especially from the external view...
The best thing I can think of is make the whole plane out of glass, set opacity to 100, and disable the inside view. After that you can color the glass with what you want.
What the hell happened to this comment section, it's filled with almost jokes.
Oh and, honestly, I'd vibe for SP2. I dunno, it feels like it's required at this point.
Yes. Fox 2s would also be nice. At this point, like Kangy said, weapons need a massive overhaul.
Hell yeah.
More thing I want to add:
HMCS. Please, I really want an HMCS that doesn't ruin my Flight Data.
Same idea as AeroBuddy's, wings just need a bit more detail.
Stealth fuselage. I swear to god it's impossible to make a stealth fuselage without putting width and height dimensions the same, or do a copius amounts of panelling just to get the shape right, and you can't even make a cockpit out of the simple stealth fuselage technique because you can't even do a correct fuselage cutting with it anymore.
Tones. Custom tones, more specifically. I wanna hear Bitchin Betty's complainin' about my piloting skills.
Airports feels too dead. Maybe add some car models to make it look better.
Better AI. AI have no grasp of energy management whatsoever, and due to the complete bs that is default planes, It's barely going to affect the speed of what the AI would be doing. Either they do so well that they'll literally rip you so fast or stay in the fight for too long until you run out of fuel, or they do so bad that they'll just dive into the water without a fight. And when they're on the ground, they will try to takeoff in anyway possible.
Ship. Parts. I don't know anything about ships, but having a catapult, arresting wire parts, engines, and more would be a nice present to ship builders.
Fix. The. Yaw. Physics. I don't care if it shakes my plane side to side after yawing, just please make it actually have an effect on our flight path.
@ReinMcDeer
THE MAN IN THE MIRROR NODS HIS HEAD
THE ONLY ONE- LEFT- WILL RIDE UPON THE DRAGONS BACK
BECAUSE THE MOUNTAINS DON'T GIVE BACK WHAT THEY TAKE
OH NO- THERE WILL BE BLOOD- BLOOD- SHED SHED-
IT'S THE ONLY THING I'VE EVER KNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWN
If I could do a simple modification, I'd add:
+2- 2 ventral fins canted about 7°. To increase stability by a little bit,
- And slats.
goddayum
+2interesting design
+2t
+
+2The data for the position of the missile.
For RWRs, and stuff.
That's the best you got?
+2I mean, you just made one.
+2@IceCraftGaming
+2@SCPCalebkid
@TRD6932
nice :D
+2Hmm...
+2OHHHH, you mean the "veering to the side" thing that tends to happen to custom gears?
Well, for that, you can go to the settings, enable manual traction, and reduce the sideways traction. Although the "veering" still exists, it wouldn't be as strong as it was before. But, decreasing this also reduces your tire grip in turning.
I recommend tuning it into around 50-70. Going too low will cause the tire to lose grip significantly, causing the ability to drift like a drunk man if you don't countersteer immediately after turning.
not even tired :WICKED:
+2what the 0 performance cost
+2how tf lmao
Funny how I just posted a delta winged aircraft yesterday.
+2If I wanted, I could just copy + paste the thing and boom.
@JamTheProtogen
+2Not too much... And yeah, it does go crazy, what do you expect?
Ok, but for real, if you don't want to always spin out of control, put this:
Activate1 ? Pitch*0.5 : Pitch
What? Hello? Grammar?
+2I mean just...
+2Increase rotator range.
@MrOofington
+2@Shimamurahougetsu
@Bryan5
@IceCraftGaming
+2@AirCrashInvestigationFLR
@CarrotDynamics
clearly what I'm thinking.
+2It's Антонов's, innit?
what
+2Standing here, I realize:
+2You were just like me trying to make history.
But who's to judge the right from wrong?
When our guard is down I think we'll both agree that:
Violence breeds violence.
But in the end it has to be this way!
I've carved my own path, you've followed your wrath,
but maybe we're both the same.
The world has turned, so many had burned,
but nobody is to blame!
Yet staring across this barren wasted land, I feel new life will be born beneath the blood stained sand!
Beneath the blood stained sand!
noice
+2I mean I guess
+2honestly swing wings are pretty simple
+2what we needed instead is a TVC tutorial
this is cool
+2updoot
ahh yes it's always gamers who complains about fps ffs it's a building game, a simple one, why would you want 120 fps?
+2furthermore, more fps means more processing, which means more lag so that means the low end devices won't even be able to experience SP at even 60 fps, it doesn't help
currently: no
+2I hope they add it in the future, for RWRs and stuff
@X99STRIKER @BeastHunter
+2sad
ok real talk for a moment
+2@X99STRIKER @BeastHunter, do you guys ever joined an sp discord server?
@X99STRIKER
+2[insert argument that makes 40% sense]
@BeastHunter
+2it's better than nothing
@X99STRIKER
+2[insert hatred comment for not accepting the apology telling that it's bad for the society bs]
@X99STRIKER
+2[insert actual argument that makes sense this time]
@BeastHunter @X99STRIKER
+2lmao
Good fight, good fight.
@X99STRIKER @BeastHunter
+2[is in denial but knows is in defeat so insert "ok yeah but I gotta go" comment]
@BeastHunter
+2[insert "no, why tf would I for a broke b like you" comment]
@X99STRIKER
+2[insert even dumber denial argument]
@BeastHunter
+2[insert dumb hatred comment]
nice
+2keep it up man :)
That's all?
+2...Aight. I'm in.
The explosions in this game is just... Weird. Sometimes one part explodes and just damages the nearby part sometimes leaving a big gap, and the other times it just blows you into pieces, no questions.
The missile itself needs alot of rework to make it at least semi-realistic. Like:
That's all, I guess.
+2I once made a challenge and I made the rules a bit too strict. This one is definitely a worse case than mine.
+2rule complaints:
1. You want high quality builds or nah? If yea, that 70 part requirement is not gonna get you anywhere. Even my simple MiG-29 is at a staggering 95 parts. Hell, my actual good simple build, F-14B AND Su-33 is at 128 (F-14) and 181 (Su-33) parts. Too strict. Lag issues? Play at low physics.
2. Not everyone knows how to make that, you know. Too strict.
3. I'm assuming "good armor" means it can withstand a blast attack, which is impossible with such low parts. Extremely, impossibly strict.
4. How do you even make shields that functions like an actual shield? Impossible to do.
5. Not possible. If a part collided with another part, either both will be utterly destroyed and blow you with your enemies up, or anticlimactically damage your craft with the enemy craft. Impossible to do.
6. No complaints about rule 6.
7. Again, not everyone knows how to do that. Too strict.
8. While this is plausible, it's very hard to pull off. Not saying it's impossible, but it ain't easy in any way.
Deadline's too short. 23rd of April is long enough? Ha! Think again! One week ain't enough my dude. An acceptable challenge deadline is approximately 3+ weeks from the day it was started. A good deadline time is around a month after the challenge started.
From what I've heard, Ukrainian-Russian conflict is ended in Ukrainian victory. Anyhow, it's best to not talk about the conflict.
@ReinMcDeer
+2Sam
@OrderlyHippo
+2Just a heads up, it's not really good... especially from the external view...
The best thing I can think of is make the whole plane out of glass, set opacity to 100, and disable the inside view. After that you can color the glass with what you want.
What the hell happened to this comment section, it's filled with almost jokes.
+2Oh and, honestly, I'd vibe for SP2. I dunno, it feels like it's required at this point.
- Yes.
- Yes. Fox 2s would also be nice. At this point, like Kangy said, weapons need a massive overhaul.
- Hell yeah.
- HMCS. Please, I really want an HMCS that doesn't ruin my Flight Data.
- Same idea as AeroBuddy's, wings just need a bit more detail.
- Stealth fuselage. I swear to god it's impossible to make a stealth fuselage without putting width and height dimensions the same, or do a copius amounts of panelling just to get the shape right, and you can't even make a cockpit out of the simple stealth fuselage technique because you can't even do a correct fuselage cutting with it anymore.
- Tones. Custom tones, more specifically. I wanna hear Bitchin Betty's complainin' about my piloting skills.
- Airports feels too dead. Maybe add some car models to make it look better.
- Better AI. AI have no grasp of energy management whatsoever, and due to the complete bs that is default planes, It's barely going to affect the speed of what the AI would be doing. Either they do so well that they'll literally rip you so fast or stay in the fight for too long until you run out of fuel, or they do so bad that they'll just dive into the water without a fight. And when they're on the ground, they will try to takeoff in anyway possible.
- Ship. Parts. I don't know anything about ships, but having a catapult, arresting wire parts, engines, and more would be a nice present to ship builders.
- Fix. The. Yaw. Physics. I don't care if it shakes my plane side to side after yawing, just please make it actually have an effect on our flight path.
+2More thing I want to add:
[angry comment]
+2look at them canopy lmao
+2oh wow...
+2I want this. I need to know how do you make the inlet. Wow.
@ReinMcDeer
+2THE MAN IN THE MIRROR NODS HIS HEAD
THE ONLY ONE- LEFT- WILL RIDE UPON THE DRAGONS BACK
BECAUSE THE MOUNTAINS DON'T GIVE BACK WHAT THEY TAKE
OH NO-
THERE WILL BE BLOOD- BLOOD- SHED SHED-
IT'S THE ONLY THING I'VE EVER KNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWN
not bad for a tomcat.
+2