@SyntheticL
Yeah, definitely some mistakes.
The first mistake was because I dunno what to put there, so I just put "air force".
The canopy part is more of my preference, so yeah. And also it kind of resembles more like a bubble canopy.
@OperatorLeaf
I don't mean the whole repainted thing
I just don't like the copy+paste description
makes it look like you added some things when in reality I added those things
then again just minor problem so don't bother it
Alright. Here we go.
Slanted tails:
They exist mainly to reduce Radar Cross Section.
Twin tails or single tail:
Twin tails for more stability.
Single tail to reduce financial issues.
Twin engines or single engine:
Twin engines for, well, double the thrust.
Single engines to reduce financial issues.
Canards increase stability of the aircraft. They move either according to pitch input, or angle of attack.
Nose pointed downwards:
That I'm not sure. Probably to reduce drag.
@ReinMcDeer oh I guess I didn't pay attention enough
When I looked at the blk 30/32 again I see something like: "From now on, F-16s with block ending 0 will be outfitted with GE engines and block ending 2 will be outfitted with Pratt & Whitney engines"
As for why they decided to put the GE engines, probably because it's more efficient despite the lower thrust
Hmm...
OHHHH, you mean the "veering to the side" thing that tends to happen to custom gears?
Well, for that, you can go to the settings, enable manual traction, and reduce the sideways traction. Although the "veering" still exists, it wouldn't be as strong as it was before. But, decreasing this also reduces your tire grip in turning.
I recommend tuning it into around 50-70. Going too low will cause the tire to lose grip significantly, causing the ability to drift like a drunk man if you don't countersteer immediately after turning.
@JamTheProtogen
Not too much... And yeah, it does go crazy, what do you expect?
Ok, but for real, if you don't want to always spin out of control, put this:
Activate1 ? Pitch*0.5 : Pitch
Standing here, I realize:
You were just like me trying to make history.
But who's to judge the right from wrong?
When our guard is down I think we'll both agree that:
Violence breeds violence.
But in the end it has to be this way!
I've carved my own path, you've followed your wrath,
but maybe we're both the same.
The world has turned, so many had burned,
but nobody is to blame!
Yet staring across this barren wasted land, I feel new life will be born beneath the blood stained sand!
Beneath the blood stained sand!
ahh yes it's always gamers who complains about fps ffs it's a building game, a simple one, why would you want 120 fps?
furthermore, more fps means more processing, which means more lag so that means the low end devices won't even be able to experience SP at even 60 fps, it doesn't help
Looks like I have another challenge to participate in...
+2@Spitfirelad05
+2Thank you.
@Dragorans
+2@CptBell
@Shimamurahougetsu
Not me, but like Phoebe said, if you have NASA computer, then sure.
+2I'm sure somebody had done it before.
device issue
+2I'm already crushing the competittion kekw
+2@SyntheticL
+2Yeah, definitely some mistakes.
The first mistake was because I dunno what to put there, so I just put "air force".
The canopy part is more of my preference, so yeah. And also it kind of resembles more like a bubble canopy.
@IceCraftGaming
+2ty
@OperatorLeaf
+2I don't mean the whole repainted thing
I just don't like the copy+paste description
makes it look like you added some things when in reality I added those things
then again just minor problem so don't bother it
so uh
+2the jeff is a delta wing, yes?
Alright. Here we go.
+2Slanted tails:
They exist mainly to reduce Radar Cross Section.
Twin tails or single tail:
Twin tails for more stability.
Single tail to reduce financial issues.
Twin engines or single engine:
Twin engines for, well, double the thrust.
Single engines to reduce financial issues.
Canards increase stability of the aircraft. They move either according to pitch input, or angle of attack.
Nose pointed downwards:
That I'm not sure. Probably to reduce drag.
just to be clear
+2I don't think anyone gives a damn about the war when they're making something
I'm boutta end this challenge's whole competition
+2hopefully, Idk
@ReinMcDeer
+2oh
I guess I didn't pay attention enough
When I looked at the blk 30/32 again I see something like: "From now on, F-16s with block ending 0 will be outfitted with GE engines and block ending 2 will be outfitted with Pratt & Whitney engines"
As for why they decided to put the GE engines, probably because it's more efficient despite the lower thrust
Yep, it's weird.
+2But it's cool.
@IceCraftGaming
+2it's a T-10
@IceCraftGaming
+2more hint:
the reporting name is the same as the finished product
@IceCraftGaming
+2no
hint:
something to do with Flanker
Oh also:
+2DSI intakes.
hmm good Idea
+2they also need to ACTUALLY spawn on the carrier if they are told to
If I could do a simple modification, I'd add:
+2- 2 ventral fins canted about 7°. To increase stability by a little bit,
- And slats.
goddayum
+2interesting design
+2t
+
+2The data for the position of the missile.
For RWRs, and stuff.
That's the best you got?
+2I mean, you just made one.
+2@IceCraftGaming
+2@SCPCalebkid
@TRD6932
nice :D
+2Hmm...
+2OHHHH, you mean the "veering to the side" thing that tends to happen to custom gears?
Well, for that, you can go to the settings, enable manual traction, and reduce the sideways traction. Although the "veering" still exists, it wouldn't be as strong as it was before. But, decreasing this also reduces your tire grip in turning.
I recommend tuning it into around 50-70. Going too low will cause the tire to lose grip significantly, causing the ability to drift like a drunk man if you don't countersteer immediately after turning.
not even tired :WICKED:
+2what the 0 performance cost
+2how tf lmao
Funny how I just posted a delta winged aircraft yesterday.
+2If I wanted, I could just copy + paste the thing and boom.
@JamTheProtogen
+2Not too much... And yeah, it does go crazy, what do you expect?
Ok, but for real, if you don't want to always spin out of control, put this:
Activate1 ? Pitch*0.5 : Pitch
What? Hello? Grammar?
+2I mean just...
+2Increase rotator range.
@MrOofington
+2@Shimamurahougetsu
@Bryan5
@IceCraftGaming
+2@AirCrashInvestigationFLR
@CarrotDynamics
clearly what I'm thinking.
+2It's Антонов's, innit?
what
+2Standing here, I realize:
+2You were just like me trying to make history.
But who's to judge the right from wrong?
When our guard is down I think we'll both agree that:
Violence breeds violence.
But in the end it has to be this way!
I've carved my own path, you've followed your wrath,
but maybe we're both the same.
The world has turned, so many had burned,
but nobody is to blame!
Yet staring across this barren wasted land, I feel new life will be born beneath the blood stained sand!
Beneath the blood stained sand!
noice
+2I mean I guess
+2honestly swing wings are pretty simple
+2what we needed instead is a TVC tutorial
this is cool
+2updoot
ahh yes it's always gamers who complains about fps ffs it's a building game, a simple one, why would you want 120 fps?
+2furthermore, more fps means more processing, which means more lag so that means the low end devices won't even be able to experience SP at even 60 fps, it doesn't help
currently: no
+2I hope they add it in the future, for RWRs and stuff
@X99STRIKER @BeastHunter
+2sad
ok real talk for a moment
+2@X99STRIKER @BeastHunter, do you guys ever joined an sp discord server?
@X99STRIKER
+2[insert argument that makes 40% sense]
@BeastHunter
+2it's better than nothing