@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Yeah well there's the point, you say you did it because you saw it as a fun challenge, that sound like a good motivation, but doing it for upvotes ??
Once again, I don't really care about them, but the point is, why would you care about them ? I mean, everyday I go to work to hget money, but when I do the stuff I like, I don't do it for money, it ain't wasted time tho, and not getting anything from the things I like won't make me stop doing these things. Same goes for SP, why would you try to catch upvotes ? I just don't get it, doing it for upvotes just sound like your playing SP like it was a part time job.
Also, about your PEAs planes, for me they ain't PEA, they're just low part / quality planes.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Part efficienty has nothing to do with low part count. Part efficienty is being economical in the way you choose and use the parts. Low part count is just a build with a "low" part count.
If your build is sitting at 50 parts, but you used 20 of them to build your landing gears, in ain't efficient, if your build has 1000 parts and you used 50 of them for the landing gears, it's efficient.
@SILVERPANZER great effort and quality isn't becoming less appreciated by the community, actually, as a quality enjoyer, I don't often see quality builds out there today. Most players (you too) thinking that they make awesome stuff don't, it's not a bad thing, but being upset about it toward others is just stupid.
Because people like you aren't PEA makers, people like you are just putting PEA before the name of a low quality build, I guess that's why people are getting upset.
I don't really get why people be hatin' so much tho, like it's just a game why would you'll get angry towards other players because they put PEA in the title of their planes.
PEA stands for "part efficiency aircraft", just a quick remember that a part efficient plane isn't a "low part aircraft". A plane can be part efficient even if it has 1000 parts, as long as the builder who made it used ingenius ideas to save as much parts as possible but still reaching the quality and details he wanted to reach.
PEA was in my opinion just an excuse for a lot of bad players to publish a bad build without it just being a bad build.
Some players managed to do great low part / efficient builds and that's all that matters.
You guys have to chill out, it's a game, it's internet points, it's 3D planes in an ugly 3D map, no need at all to make 400 forum posts about it.
Upvotes ain't progression, upvotes are the reflect of what the community likes.
If you play for others, there's no point playing, bye.
And honestly, your builds are good, but I don't really see why they should get more upvotes, they are pretty average, not trying to be rude, but it kinda upsets me people living because of that, play for yourself, have fun, and if you really play to get upvotes, just do pixel art, waifu related planes and memes, because that's what the community likes.
@Realturtlecat You're just one of does guys who only build to get upvotes, those are just random internet points and often doesn't mean that your builds are quality, no need to ask for upvotes or why people don't upvote your stuff, if it's good, if people like it, they will upvote without having to ask for it.
@PilotBug I still don't understand the cockpit part, I'm sure you know what you're talking about but it's really confusing from an exterior perspective.
I don't know why it won't be a thing, I'm not a dev, but it won't be a thing. I don't know if it's hard to implement or not since I'm not a dev neither, but there are maybe othe reasons for why they decided to not implement that.
@PilotBug Multiplayer vehicles won't be a thing because the question has already been asked and answered.
I don't really understand the issue with the cockpit thing.
Multiplier vehicles won't be a thing, but I've already discussed some plans with friends to make it possible with magnets and stuff.
Self destructable parts would be nice but it's kinda weird, should we add this option to all parts ? Will it be with an Activation Group ? Will parts like engines just fail or fully brake appart, and what about fuselage parts ?
I feel like it's pretty easy to make cockpits today, it was a pain back when the interior / slicing update wasn't a thing but people already managed to make good interiors and today people really do crazy stuff.
Seeing the trailer for SP2 it seems pretty obvious that the water mechanics will be way better, they showed a boat and a submarine that really looked like builds they made, so I doupt they kept the old water from SP1.
More AI would be great indeed but it's already kinda possible with mods today, so I guess it'll be the same for SP2 if it ain't implemented in-game.
A friendly AI plane would be nice indeed, but will it really be useful in a game where there will be multiplayer ? And will it be possible to spawn AI in multiplayer ?
It's a good idea, I don't know why we can't use weapons and other features while flying with the auto-pilot, it should just try to keep the plane straight.
Yes tank tracks are a need, there's too many tank makers out there to forget them.
Yes it's also a good idea, especially in multiplayer since it would be a pain to respawn every two minutes to re-arm.
I don't know if Jundroo is really willing to make killable players, it's before everything else a building game.
You can pretty much create whatever custom weapon you want today with some skills and time. But I do agree that the system could be simplified.
Third person aiming would be great.
I really do hope that there will be both public and private servers.
@ollielebanania didn't try it out yet but seing the comments it looks like it works, and if it does awesome work ! It was time somebody finally dared to make one.
@Randomplayer everybody will rush it, but that doesn't mean it will be good stuff. I'm willing to take a little bit more time than others to drop the first really good build of SP2. I'm not the best player out there but I'm sure that I can do something great :)
Thanks to the multiplier, we will be able to make aerobatics teams and that's one of the first thing I'll do. Of course I think the very first thing like everybody will just be flying around the new world and check the new parts and possibilities
@rexzion Yeah I have to adjust the fuel consomation of the build (and I think I will have to put more fuel than in the real one, but I'll keep the right amount of fuel mass).
we do speak english (with our really strong french accent tho) so it would be a pleasure to connect in multiplayer and do this kind of stuff, often we do this while trying each others builds, it's more fun than waiting for the other guy to test it then write a fat ass text for feedback.
This build doesn't look like it's the best out there, in fact it isn't. But keep in mind that it is made on a poor performing phone and even so, he had the patience and will to make a lot of details on things such as the landing-gears, cockpit and systems of the control surfaces, which is really appreciated.
The "Rudder" input is the name of the variable they made for the vertical stab' controls. Check the variable menu to look at the code and sée how it works.
I don't know if they made a variable for the other control surfaces but it will be the same thing, just some FT.
The model is beautiful, it's a good replica of the F-16.
But I'm very very disapointed about the flight model, could have been worse of course, but it would have been an awesome build if it was both good looking and have a good flight model.
@windshifter1 Thanks !
Sadly I use a map that isn't finished and which never came out, so it's not really possible to aquire it but it's a full size map of the falklands.
For reshade, if you may share me your discord profil it would be a pleasure for me to share the presets with you.
Hi ! Won't tell again what I already told you...wait actually I'll do it.
Except a few details, this plane is awesome, it looks great, feels really good to fly and I love how you tried to make it as realistic as easy to use. The interior is far better than most builds out here (as is the exterior) and it's not really important but it's a pleasure to see a less common and known plane being build with this amount of effort.
Lovely build, can't wait to see the next ones and would love to help you again !
Beautiful plane, if you want some screenshots of it let me know ! I'd love to make some it's a fantastic looking build and a plane that we rarely see here
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Yeah well there's the point, you say you did it because you saw it as a fun challenge, that sound like a good motivation, but doing it for upvotes ??
+1Once again, I don't really care about them, but the point is, why would you care about them ? I mean, everyday I go to work to hget money, but when I do the stuff I like, I don't do it for money, it ain't wasted time tho, and not getting anything from the things I like won't make me stop doing these things. Same goes for SP, why would you try to catch upvotes ? I just don't get it, doing it for upvotes just sound like your playing SP like it was a part time job.
Also, about your PEAs planes, for me they ain't PEA, they're just low part / quality planes.
@Pan I only make replicas, but that doesn't mean I made my personality around that, same goes for them.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover un-popular opinion : maturity is realising that fun is just the right amount of realism, not a plane that can take 20Gs.
+1congrats dude
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Part efficienty has nothing to do with low part count.
+1Part efficienty is being economical in the way you choose and use the parts.
Low part count is just a build with a "low" part count.
If your build is sitting at 50 parts, but you used 20 of them to build your landing gears, in ain't efficient, if your build has 1000 parts and you used 50 of them for the landing gears, it's efficient.
Platinium by reposting planes, congrats.
Just kidding, welcome to the club.
congrats
@SILVERPANZER great effort and quality isn't becoming less appreciated by the community, actually, as a quality enjoyer, I don't often see quality builds out there today. Most players (you too) thinking that they make awesome stuff don't, it's not a bad thing, but being upset about it toward others is just stupid.
+1@Pan and people like you, just a little bit better than average, hating on other people because they put PEA in the title of their builds disgust me.
+4Because people like you aren't PEA makers, people like you are just putting PEA before the name of a low quality build, I guess that's why people are getting upset.
+2I don't really get why people be hatin' so much tho, like it's just a game why would you'll get angry towards other players because they put PEA in the title of their planes.
PEA stands for "part efficiency aircraft", just a quick remember that a part efficient plane isn't a "low part aircraft". A plane can be part efficient even if it has 1000 parts, as long as the builder who made it used ingenius ideas to save as much parts as possible but still reaching the quality and details he wanted to reach.
PEA was in my opinion just an excuse for a lot of bad players to publish a bad build without it just being a bad build.
+6Some players managed to do great low part / efficient builds and that's all that matters.
You guys have to chill out, it's a game, it's internet points, it's 3D planes in an ugly 3D map, no need at all to make 400 forum posts about it.
Upvotes ain't progression, upvotes are the reflect of what the community likes.
If you play for others, there's no point playing, bye.
And honestly, your builds are good, but I don't really see why they should get more upvotes, they are pretty average, not trying to be rude, but it kinda upsets me people living because of that, play for yourself, have fun, and if you really play to get upvotes, just do pixel art, waifu related planes and memes, because that's what the community likes.
+5I've seen that you're french, il y a un serveur discord dédié aux joueurs de SP francophone, ça pourrait surement t’intéresser.
+3@Realturtlecat You're just one of does guys who only build to get upvotes, those are just random internet points and often doesn't mean that your builds are quality, no need to ask for upvotes or why people don't upvote your stuff, if it's good, if people like it, they will upvote without having to ask for it.
let's turn the question around, why do you think other people get more upvotes ?
@PilotBug I still don't understand the cockpit part, I'm sure you know what you're talking about but it's really confusing from an exterior perspective.
I don't know why it won't be a thing, I'm not a dev, but it won't be a thing. I don't know if it's hard to implement or not since I'm not a dev neither, but there are maybe othe reasons for why they decided to not implement that.
@PilotBug Multiplayer vehicles won't be a thing because the question has already been asked and answered.
I don't really understand the issue with the cockpit thing.
So, my little response to this :
Multiplier vehicles won't be a thing, but I've already discussed some plans with friends to make it possible with magnets and stuff.
Self destructable parts would be nice but it's kinda weird, should we add this option to all parts ? Will it be with an Activation Group ? Will parts like engines just fail or fully brake appart, and what about fuselage parts ?
I feel like it's pretty easy to make cockpits today, it was a pain back when the interior / slicing update wasn't a thing but people already managed to make good interiors and today people really do crazy stuff.
Seeing the trailer for SP2 it seems pretty obvious that the water mechanics will be way better, they showed a boat and a submarine that really looked like builds they made, so I doupt they kept the old water from SP1.
More AI would be great indeed but it's already kinda possible with mods today, so I guess it'll be the same for SP2 if it ain't implemented in-game.
A friendly AI plane would be nice indeed, but will it really be useful in a game where there will be multiplayer ? And will it be possible to spawn AI in multiplayer ?
It's a good idea, I don't know why we can't use weapons and other features while flying with the auto-pilot, it should just try to keep the plane straight.
Yes tank tracks are a need, there's too many tank makers out there to forget them.
Yes it's also a good idea, especially in multiplayer since it would be a pain to respawn every two minutes to re-arm.
I don't know if Jundroo is really willing to make killable players, it's before everything else a building game.
You can pretty much create whatever custom weapon you want today with some skills and time. But I do agree that the system could be simplified.
Third person aiming would be great.
I really do hope that there will be both public and private servers.
@ollielebanania didn't try it out yet but seing the comments it looks like it works, and if it does awesome work ! It was time somebody finally dared to make one.
@Rb2h no need to fix it, it works
Reshade and skills 😤😤
@Randomplayer everybody will rush it, but that doesn't mean it will be good stuff. I'm willing to take a little bit more time than others to drop the first really good build of SP2. I'm not the best player out there but I'm sure that I can do something great :)
+3it happens to be honnest
+1Thanks to the multiplier, we will be able to make aerobatics teams and that's one of the first thing I'll do. Of course I think the very first thing like everybody will just be flying around the new world and check the new parts and possibilities
+1@WisconsinStatePolice F-5 mentionned and I love that
if it really is going to be the best plane of its type of the whole website I guess it's worth it, willing to put my hands on it !
+1@rexzion Yeah I have to adjust the fuel consomation of the build (and I think I will have to put more fuel than in the real one, but I'll keep the right amount of fuel mass).
we do speak english (with our really strong french accent tho) so it would be a pleasure to connect in multiplayer and do this kind of stuff, often we do this while trying each others builds, it's more fun than waiting for the other guy to test it then write a fat ass text for feedback.
To think that you made this shape on mobile is impressive.
over G ! over G ! over G ! over G !
@windshifter1 thanks for the tag. will test the creation later I have some work. nice screenshots tho.
@CaptainBrayden would have said the same thing
@CaptainNoble for real, but it was a lot of fun playing with you
@WinsWings yeah, it was the most epic thing I did in SP haha
+1Formation landing with @MisterT , somehow forgot to record my own voice.
MisterT also made the WeatherMod, which is how we have these clouds, rain and storm so check is account out.
WIP Mirage F1 by me.
To all the people that will see this :
This build doesn't look like it's the best out there, in fact it isn't. But keep in mind that it is made on a poor performing phone and even so, he had the patience and will to make a lot of details on things such as the landing-gears, cockpit and systems of the control surfaces, which is really appreciated.
+1@SouthJetAirways fair enough, it's a plane building game tho
@SouthJetAirways I a game where you can literally build everything why would you need mods ?
+1How are you doing this ? By posting a build or a forum post every few days and gaining juste a few points from them.
+1The "Rudder" input is the name of the variable they made for the vertical stab' controls. Check the variable menu to look at the code and sée how it works.
+2I don't know if they made a variable for the other control surfaces but it will be the same thing, just some FT.
Nice car
+1The model is beautiful, it's a good replica of the F-16.
But I'm very very disapointed about the flight model, could have been worse of course, but it would have been an awesome build if it was both good looking and have a good flight model.
+1@windshifter1 Thanks !
Sadly I use a map that isn't finished and which never came out, so it's not really possible to aquire it but it's a full size map of the falklands.
For reshade, if you may share me your discord profil it would be a pleasure for me to share the presets with you.
Hi ! Won't tell again what I already told you...wait actually I'll do it.
Except a few details, this plane is awesome, it looks great, feels really good to fly and I love how you tried to make it as realistic as easy to use. The interior is far better than most builds out here (as is the exterior) and it's not really important but it's a pleasure to see a less common and known plane being build with this amount of effort.
+2Lovely build, can't wait to see the next ones and would love to help you again !
80-85 % is a pretty good score, most players can't achieve that
That really was a funny moment
+1Won't you make custom control surfaces ? You didn't do it on the horizontal stabs, it would look way better
Beautiful plane, if you want some screenshots of it let me know ! I'd love to make some it's a fantastic looking build and a plane that we rarely see here
+2?? what are the modifications ?
@c00sm003939 yeah kinda
+1vive la pluie ! à quand un mod pour ajouter des vaches histoire de se sentir en bretagne ?
+1