@Lumian300 excellent work, my friend. And that comes from a person who doesn't like Japanese animation. I hope unpleasant guys in this comment section won't discourage you to post more stuff like this.
@CRJ900Pilot @Mymessage what do you find wrong in this post? No nudity, no profanity, it's definitely not spam... SimplePlanes Masters group agrees with @TheLatentImage and @AndrewGarrison completely here. And with temporary ban being used more freely. This is an amazing build made by a skillful builder. If you don't like it, upvote something else. We don't need toxicity in this community.
It's amazing. I love how the tracks follow the terrain. Cannon works great, but the range is a bit short. I'll have to steal that trick with headlights. I'd have never thought of doing it like that.
Welcome to the community. Read the rules here. You will gain points (the number in the white square next to your username). One "Upvote" on a plane you upload brings 15 points, and an upvote on the forum post brings 2 points. Once you reach 100 points, your point field (currently white) will turn bronze, at 1000 points silver, at 5000 gold, and black (we call it platinum) at 25000 points. To tag a person in the comment, put "@" in front of their username, or hit the "Reply" button on their comment (ex: @Pricey123). This will send notification to the person you mentioned. I wish you a happy stay in the SimplePlanes community, and a lot of points.
Really nice build for its part count. Cockpit could have been a bit more realistic, but it's usable. Maybe a bit more opacity on the wings. Performance are close to how I'd expect the real thing to fly.
By the way, you have a typo in the description. It says "WWII".
Plutonium weighs around 19,840kg/m^3. A sphere of 1.5m in diameter (this sphere) has a volume of 14.14m^3. If it were made of plutonium, it would weigh 280537.6kg. More than 20 times the weight you have here (:
@GermanPaperProjects I am not a racist. I believe all people are born equal, and race or genetics do not, on their own, dictate person's character or lifestyle.
I believe in unlimited freedom of speech, and in simple language that uses the simplest possible label for everything, regardless of how self-entitled people feel about it.
@Fish83828 nope. I've had it with all the drama. Somebody else can lost their faith in humanity every day while looking at all the NSFW builds and idiotic arguments that have been reported XD
I had a very long break with detailed builds, made a few failed builds, and now I'm working on a masterpiece to put all my previous builds to shame, having finally fully mastered the new stuff. I don't see why you wouldn't come back.
While the ship looks very nice, idea of having two different calibers of big guns is awful. Such system was used on large warships until HMS Dreadnought introduced uniform main battery. When you have two sets of similar guns with different ballistic properties, it creates confusion with fire control, as you're not sure which splashes are from which guns and can't appropriately adjust fire.
@DaVinci all these parts are coming for non-VR version. You can't build in VR, so all the parts need to be available in the base game Then you take a craft from the base game and play with it in VR if you have VR.
@PotatoJenkins1 read the rest of the post. It later turned out it was due to my brief rant about BLM protests on a different server, one that is not upen to the community.
@CenturyAerospace WNP did mention additional features to the cut option in one of the pinned comments. What you are talking about moght be one of those options. All we can do is wait and see when the update drops.
I suggest putting the deadline to "one week after the gauges update". Most planes from the era featured open cockpits, and one week after the full update should give everyone enough time to incorporate new parts into their builds, while the time until the update will probably be long enough for people to prepare their builds.
Biggest one is SPBC. Pretty much everyone is there. The few who aren't have been banned for various offenses. You can join that one through a link in my bio.
The best one is SPMC, but that one's very difficult to join.
I run a dedicated shipbuilding server, Port SP, also accessible through my bio.
@MrShenanigans the biggest trick was the choice of the build. I have picked a barge because the hull can be made with only three parts. As for the rest, I have picked the most notable details and left out the less important ones.
A great looking build, but lacking functionality. First and the biggest problem I found is that many hemispheres used for rivets aren't attached and are falling off and rattling. Second is that it accelerates like a top fuel dragster. There are codes to be found for slow acceleration but still enough power to climb hills. Also, cockpit should extend high above the vehicle when missiles are erected so that it can achieve a lock behind terrain.
Another thing is inaccuracy. While the vehicle looks like the real thing, missiles do not. There are two missiles this vehicle can carry: Iskander ballistic missile and a cruise missile that's packed in a tube before launch. Also, doors open and missiles erect one by one.
You could have also automated the whole system so it works with a push of a button. Code you would need is basically the code for landing gear doors. Pressing a single button would lower the supports, open one side, erect and activate one missile, and lift the cockpit on hidden pistons so it can aim. Launching the first missile could automatically lower its rail, close its container, and open the other side and lift the other missile.
@KnightOfRen because I just spent fifteen minutes removing fifty-ish add a part posts of one giant, branching string, going up and down each branch to get them all. I have decided to stop the resurgence of this spammy behavior by reminding the community that it's against the rules.
Chinese have rarely outright copied anything. They have a tendency to produce things under license, and the world has tendency to outsource manufacturing to China and to hire Chinese experts, letting them learn how to make things. A good example is JF-17. That plane is, in fact, a development of MiG-21 using all the things Chinese have learned. It just happens to look a lot like F-16, with which it shares almost nothing but overall layout.
@Lumian300 excellent work, my friend. And that comes from a person who doesn't like Japanese animation. I hope unpleasant guys in this comment section won't discourage you to post more stuff like this.
+4@CRJ900Pilot @Mymessage what do you find wrong in this post? No nudity, no profanity, it's definitely not spam... SimplePlanes Masters group agrees with @TheLatentImage and @AndrewGarrison completely here. And with temporary ban being used more freely. This is an amazing build made by a skillful builder. If you don't like it, upvote something else. We don't need toxicity in this community.
+4Where's landing gear?
+4It's amazing. I love how the tracks follow the terrain. Cannon works great, but the range is a bit short. I'll have to steal that trick with headlights. I'd have never thought of doing it like that.
+4I have moved my upvote from previous version to this one.
+4Welcome to the community. Read the rules here. You will gain points (the number in the white square next to your username). One "Upvote" on a plane you upload brings 15 points, and an upvote on the forum post brings 2 points. Once you reach 100 points, your point field (currently white) will turn bronze, at 1000 points silver, at 5000 gold, and black (we call it platinum) at 25000 points. To tag a person in the comment, put "@" in front of their username, or hit the "Reply" button on their comment (ex: @Pricey123). This will send notification to the person you mentioned. I wish you a happy stay in the SimplePlanes community, and a lot of points.
+4Really nice build for its part count. Cockpit could have been a bit more realistic, but it's usable. Maybe a bit more opacity on the wings. Performance are close to how I'd expect the real thing to fly.
+3By the way, you have a typo in the description. It says "WWII".
Very interesting concept. They would have to replace the entire suspension after every shot though.
+3Happy SP Birthday B. Here's for the many years to come!
+3rises a mug
Plutonium weighs around 19,840kg/m^3. A sphere of 1.5m in diameter (this sphere) has a volume of 14.14m^3. If it were made of plutonium, it would weigh 280537.6kg. More than 20 times the weight you have here (:
+3Perhaps you should have also added an image of what it does in the description. Other than that, nice build.
+3@WarringMunky I'm not a Catholic priest.
+3@GermanPaperProjects I am not a racist. I believe all people are born equal, and race or genetics do not, on their own, dictate person's character or lifestyle.
+3I believe in unlimited freedom of speech, and in simple language that uses the simplest possible label for everything, regardless of how self-entitled people feel about it.
@Fish83828 nope. I've had it with all the drama. Somebody else can lost their faith in humanity every day while looking at all the NSFW builds and idiotic arguments that have been reported XD
+3Sucks to see that the old problems still persist, though it only stands to reason. You're doing a great job keeping them in check, guys.
+3Quite impressive. It's not something that generally goes with my typical builds, but I'm sure it will be fun for messing around.
+3It looks amazing, especially for the part count. Hopefully I won't forget to test it when I'm free.
+3Very nice ship.
+3That's a very detailed detail.
+3I'm not sure you want the gun to elevate with the sight, especially on a mortar. You can't see where you're shooting at greater distances.
+3I had a very long break with detailed builds, made a few failed builds, and now I'm working on a masterpiece to put all my previous builds to shame, having finally fully mastered the new stuff. I don't see why you wouldn't come back.
+3While the ship looks very nice, idea of having two different calibers of big guns is awful. Such system was used on large warships until HMS Dreadnought introduced uniform main battery. When you have two sets of similar guns with different ballistic properties, it creates confusion with fire control, as you're not sure which splashes are from which guns and can't appropriately adjust fire.
+3@DaVinci all these parts are coming for non-VR version. You can't build in VR, so all the parts need to be available in the base game Then you take a craft from the base game and play with it in VR if you have VR.
+3@PotatoJenkins1 read the rest of the post. It later turned out it was due to my brief rant about BLM protests on a different server, one that is not upen to the community.
+3@CenturyAerospace WNP did mention additional features to the cut option in one of the pinned comments. What you are talking about moght be one of those options. All we can do is wait and see when the update drops.
+3I suggest putting the deadline to "one week after the gauges update". Most planes from the era featured open cockpits, and one week after the full update should give everyone enough time to incorporate new parts into their builds, while the time until the update will probably be long enough for people to prepare their builds.
+3@Goolumoolu those who participated in the challenge knew how to delete the wall. Challenge has, however, been closed for over three years.
+3@CharlesDeGaulle they will stop when they see that nobody cares.
+3They use smokeless powder.
+3Input that would maintain a set rollAngle, or one that would force the rate of heading, if you want to use funky trees.
+3Not bad at all. Proportion is a bit off in some areas, but overall a good build.
+3@TirpitzWantsPlanes link me to the original so I can compare. Don't worry, I can see removed comments.
+3Biggest one is SPBC. Pretty much everyone is there. The few who aren't have been banned for various offenses. You can join that one through a link in my bio.
+3The best one is SPMC, but that one's very difficult to join.
I run a dedicated shipbuilding server, Port SP, also accessible through my bio.
@MrShenanigans the biggest trick was the choice of the build. I have picked a barge because the hull can be made with only three parts. As for the rest, I have picked the most notable details and left out the less important ones.
+3@Lerkov1991 unfortunately, due to Google's policies, Android no longer supports mods.
+3A great looking build, but lacking functionality. First and the biggest problem I found is that many hemispheres used for rivets aren't attached and are falling off and rattling. Second is that it accelerates like a top fuel dragster. There are codes to be found for slow acceleration but still enough power to climb hills. Also, cockpit should extend high above the vehicle when missiles are erected so that it can achieve a lock behind terrain.
+3Another thing is inaccuracy. While the vehicle looks like the real thing, missiles do not. There are two missiles this vehicle can carry: Iskander ballistic missile and a cruise missile that's packed in a tube before launch. Also, doors open and missiles erect one by one.
You could have also automated the whole system so it works with a push of a button. Code you would need is basically the code for landing gear doors. Pressing a single button would lower the supports, open one side, erect and activate one missile, and lift the cockpit on hidden pistons so it can aim. Launching the first missile could automatically lower its rail, close its container, and open the other side and lift the other missile.
This is a good example of a successor build. Significant changes, all listed in description, auto-credit and credit in description. Good job.
+3Very nice build. A bit too heavy for my laptop, but it looks amazing.
+3@TheMegaMauster he keeps getting banned, not deleting accounts. It's a permabanned user.
+3@NightmareCorporation better go with an iron cross or something. People don't like swastika.
+3@FLOWRIDER0 I was learning how to pirate games for the phone, and SP happened to be the one I pirated. I soon decided to buy it, as I liked it a lot.
+3Very smooth build, and the proportion is spot on. I suggested using custom control surfaces on the next one.
+3It flies quite well. I'm not impressed by the turrets though. Lack of crosshair makes it difficult to hit anything.
+3@KnightOfRen because I just spent fifteen minutes removing fifty-ish add a part posts of one giant, branching string, going up and down each branch to get them all. I have decided to stop the resurgence of this spammy behavior by reminding the community that it's against the rules.
+3We have this, @BMilan @superTT .
+3"feature" was by accident because "edit" and "feature" buttons are next to one another.
+3Chinese have rarely outright copied anything. They have a tendency to produce things under license, and the world has tendency to outsource manufacturing to China and to hire Chinese experts, letting them learn how to make things. A good example is JF-17. That plane is, in fact, a development of MiG-21 using all the things Chinese have learned. It just happens to look a lot like F-16, with which it shares almost nothing but overall layout.
+3@MrACEpilot that's weird. Nobody else reported that problem.
+3@bjac0 yes, that would be a good idea.
+3That is unrealistic. Missiles are expensive, and within your field of view could be friendlies and civilians.
+3