You can make flare proof guardian missiles by making them insta lock, then you can set their activation group to when the target is moving towards them. Something like rate(TargetDistance)>100
To simulate how notching works irl.
If you want to use the "water injection system" for one of your own planes, just look for the minigun and save it as a subassembly. it should be in the tail, behind the cowl flaps.
This is like if the Super Hornet and a SU-27 had a kid, except both parents where tragically killed in a car accident, so the kid got raised by their weird uncle the MiG-29
This is like if the Kifir had a child with the Super Entard, but, maybe they had a bit of a trio with the Viggen, so you can’t really tell who the dad is
Many people make fun of the "eagle" for its "dumb looks" however others may claim that its about function, not form, and that the eagle is secretly the best fighter jet of its generation. I am here to tell you that those others are dead wrong.
This aircraft, marketed as the "eagle" (not to be confused with the McDonnell-Douglas f-15 "eagle") is claimed to be a supermaneuverable, lightweight, carrier capable "5th gen" fighter. However while it may appear like a cutting-edge combat aircraft it is, in reality nothing but a hoax.
The most important advantages of a modern 5th generation platform are sensor fusion and network warfare. Despite this the eagles designers seem to have completely neglected to install even a basic data-link. This problem becomes even worse when you consider the fact that the eagle has limited situational awareness to begin with, being equipped with only 2 IRST systems nicknamed EYES (Electro-optical Yield Estimation Sensor). This gives the eagle an undeniable disadvantage in BVR combat. Without a radar, datalink, or RWR, pilots will essentially be flying blind with their ears plugged.
In addition, while its flying wing design may allow for some stealth benefits, its radar absorbent coating is fairly primitive, utilizing compound organic geometry known as "feathers". Feather technology is well known to be inferior to modern di-electric silica composite or "iron ball" coatings. Therefore this aircraft can not be considered truly "fith-gen".
Additionally In terms of conventional "4th gen" performance, while this fighter jet has good stol capabilities, it does not have any arrestor gear installed yet and so, it cannot currently operate off of a aircraft carrier. When it comes to "super maneuverability" the airframe does appear to be capable of post stall maneuvers, due to its low wing loading, however, post stall maneuvers alone cannot win a dogfight. Energy retention, and power to weight are arguably more important than PSM capabilities, and in these categories, the eagle suffers drastically, with its awful energy retention it is not capable of sustaining a turn for long, and its weak engine means its cannot re-gain energy lost during PSM maneuvers.
but wait there's more, because the eagle is designed as a "light fighter" it has a extremely limited payload and range. What you end up with is a plane with the capabilities of a T-38 or a L-39, but for the cost of a F-22. Some fighters like the SAAB J-39 Gripen have a similar issue, but
-the Gripen makes up for this by offering a suite of sensors and weapons that other aircraft do not. However, as you can see above, the eagle does not have even the most basic systems one would expect from a fighter of its cost.
2/10, my disappointment is immeasurable, and my day is ruined.
You can make flare proof guardian missiles by making them insta lock, then you can set their activation group to when the target is moving towards them. Something like
rate(TargetDistance)>100To simulate how notching works irl.
You can put spread on cannons?
+1Attacking the d point
@CrestelAeronautics I fixed the code block so it can be copy-pasted
@CrestelAeronautics delete to part at the end that says &1t; and replace it with <
@CrestelAeronautics does it let you fire the missile from the front, or is it disabling the missile?
Thank you for the Target Heading thingy, it was really useful
f-16 turn rate according to growling sidewinder:
+1mommy?
+8this is awesome
If you want to use the "water injection system" for one of your own planes, just look for the minigun and save it as a subassembly. it should be in the tail, behind the cowl flaps.
@Noidtouse pretty much
This is like if the Super Hornet and a SU-27 had a kid, except both parents where tragically killed in a car accident, so the kid got raised by their weird uncle the MiG-29
+1This is like if the Kifir had a child with the Super Entard, but, maybe they had a bit of a trio with the Viggen, so you can’t really tell who the dad is
Anyway, awesome build
Many people make fun of the "eagle" for its "dumb looks" however others may claim that its about function, not form, and that the eagle is secretly the best fighter jet of its generation. I am here to tell you that those others are dead wrong.
This aircraft, marketed as the "eagle" (not to be confused with the McDonnell-Douglas f-15 "eagle") is claimed to be a supermaneuverable, lightweight, carrier capable "5th gen" fighter. However while it may appear like a cutting-edge combat aircraft it is, in reality nothing but a hoax.
+2The most important advantages of a modern 5th generation platform are sensor fusion and network warfare. Despite this the eagles designers seem to have completely neglected to install even a basic data-link. This problem becomes even worse when you consider the fact that the eagle has limited situational awareness to begin with, being equipped with only 2 IRST systems nicknamed EYES (Electro-optical Yield Estimation Sensor). This gives the eagle an undeniable disadvantage in BVR combat. Without a radar, datalink, or RWR, pilots will essentially be flying blind with their ears plugged.
In addition, while its flying wing design may allow for some stealth benefits, its radar absorbent coating is fairly primitive, utilizing compound organic geometry known as "feathers". Feather technology is well known to be inferior to modern di-electric silica composite or "iron ball" coatings. Therefore this aircraft can not be considered truly "fith-gen".
Additionally In terms of conventional "4th gen" performance, while this fighter jet has good stol capabilities, it does not have any arrestor gear installed yet and so, it cannot currently operate off of a aircraft carrier. When it comes to "super maneuverability" the airframe does appear to be capable of post stall maneuvers, due to its low wing loading, however, post stall maneuvers alone cannot win a dogfight. Energy retention, and power to weight are arguably more important than PSM capabilities, and in these categories, the eagle suffers drastically, with its awful energy retention it is not capable of sustaining a turn for long, and its weak engine means its cannot re-gain energy lost during PSM maneuvers.
but wait there's more, because the eagle is designed as a "light fighter" it has a extremely limited payload and range. What you end up with is a plane with the capabilities of a T-38 or a L-39, but for the cost of a F-22. Some fighters like the SAAB J-39 Gripen have a similar issue, but
-the Gripen makes up for this by offering a suite of sensors and weapons that other aircraft do not. However, as you can see above, the eagle does not have even the most basic systems one would expect from a fighter of its cost.
2/10, my disappointment is immeasurable, and my day is ruined.
+1Pog
fnaf at freddys
I have an urge to bite mouthfuls of gravel
. . .Anyways, very epik weapon
+1Poggers
+1adding dead weight wont help because its balancing on one wheel
+1@LoganTheGameDev its because of the big wheels on top.
@Skykid028 cool
+1also the missiles wont work because the primary cockpit is backwards and facing upside-down
amazingly detailed. 9.5/10
I appreciate the startup sequence not being unnecessarily difficult,
the only thing I don't like is the afterburner.
Can I get a please burger cheese? Nice work bro 👍👍
Is this the thing from spaceman spiff?
+2the raptor but naval
+1Hey @Walvis it’s ya boy, Fart sniffer 9000, just wondering if you have you seen the news?
I keep on forgetting
@GabrielFangster70 @Trainzo it says on the steam page that you can load old builds, but they can’t guarantee it will work the same as in SP 1
Poggers
+1I don’t get the reference
Can i be your pogchamp?
24th upvote 🪑🪑🪑
+2@mrxml that’s why there is a orbit camera attached to the plane
t
I’ve always wondered if the plane from despicable me is based of this
+1🗿Literally me:
+1Comment
It’s mostly random parts (hinges, text, engines, etc) with funky tree input.
Tee
The cutlass has such a unique look, its a shame it was a death trap irl
V
🔥
+1@Funnny how??? It hasnt even been 10 seconds
no.
Kazakhstan and Ukraine 2
I wanna be her boy-toy
+1Door thunder