@ThomasRoderick
Well, the Prototype variant is pretty similar to the main one, just having a recoloured underside, 4 prop blades and a little bit of decal changing, but the other two are more extensive in their mods, with the NF version having a different paint job, new decals on the side, no cannons, 1 drop tank and 2 empty tanks and a working radar.
The PR variant has a completely different paint job too, no guns, a new interior in the turret and will have camera equipment (soon).
@MrSilverWolf
Wheels can be used. Floats, yes (though i don't know where a float plane would go...). I think so it remains relevant to the title, I'm limiting to the Arctic Circle.
@XAircraftManufacturer
I have some constructive criticism for this forum post. First, you should add the name of the build's creator. Whilst it's not necessary, you can also link to the original build.
@IceCraftGaming
It actually kind of does. If the majority of people are offline, the build doesn't get enough activity/attention and kind of just falls into the background.
As hpgb said, use the seat part for making the cockpit. You also shouldn't XML resize it as it's been sized to be realistically scaled to a comparable seat and human in real life. This can help you with scaling your build to a realistic size.
@Walvis
Actually, just to double check, I'm remaking my G-5D Phantom and I wanted to check with you if the thing I'm planning to change about the design is alright.
I'm intending to change the canopy as it's styled after the Vulcan's, so I'm looking to model it after something the B-66 or the more conventional style of an airliner.
Other then that, the only other thing that will change is the proportions and size of the airframe to be more realistic.
That okay?
@SteamPunkPilot
In the first 'inputcontroller' section in Overload/XML, there will be an option zeroOnDeactivate. This should be set to true. Then assign an AG or variable (the variable should be linked to a button, switch or lever) to the engine.
@DeveloperKorzalerke
Don't think so. DeathStalker627 pointed out to me on Discord it might be a Domain blocking thing actually.
This is backed I think by the fact I don't have these issues on my iPad.
TheDesignate
+5Sorry, but I'll have to disqualify this due to the part count being too low.
@SkullKid25
+6You need to be around SP for a bit longer to understand this one. It's basically the biggest meme in this community.
@DOX
PlaneFlightX has made videos on variables.
Intense groaning
+1Insert Doctor voice
"No way, I can't believe this!"
@SheriffHackdogMCPE
+1Not really. I think more like Dornier 328JET
@ThomasRoderick
Well, the Prototype variant is pretty similar to the main one, just having a recoloured underside, 4 prop blades and a little bit of decal changing, but the other two are more extensive in their mods, with the NF version having a different paint job, new decals on the side, no cannons, 1 drop tank and 2 empty tanks and a working radar.
The PR variant has a completely different paint job too, no guns, a new interior in the turret and will have camera equipment (soon).
So, you decide if that's enough difference 🤷♀️
You've shown this already
(Still good though)
+2@BeastHunter
+1I mean....this isn't a teaser....but ok..
@Brayden1981
+1Not really, as it's not your own build.
@bruhmoment99
+1Skis in SP, when attached to planes, always have flattened wheels on the bottom.
@MrSilverWolf
+1Wheels can be used. Floats, yes (though i don't know where a float plane would go...). I think so it remains relevant to the title, I'm limiting to the Arctic Circle.
@Brayden1981
+1Remake of...what..
Requested tags:
+3@Dastin
@shibusu
@Sakorsky
The only sky that would fit @U is the actual cosmos.
@XAircraftManufacturer
I have some constructive criticism for this forum post. First, you should add the name of the build's creator. Whilst it's not necessary, you can also link to the original build.
@IceCraftGaming
+1It actually kind of does. If the majority of people are offline, the build doesn't get enough activity/attention and kind of just falls into the background.
@KingOfTypos
+2I get that...but the the 'tail' is very specific, considering it means the back of the fuselage.
@X4JB
+1Yeah, as Shenan said, they didn't say it's unfinished.
@X4JB
+2What makes you class it as 'unfinished'?
I would, if I could. I live in Britain though.
+3I have to say, I'm impressed by the new ways people are rickrolling people nowadays, it's quite impressive.
+1@FarrowTECH
what....
The tail goes at the back....
@jamesPLANESii
+1Ah yes. Thanks
@jamesPLANESii
+1Is that still the Stork Island map in the second thumbnail photo?
Holy s**t
+3As hpgb said, use the seat part for making the cockpit. You also shouldn't XML resize it as it's been sized to be realistically scaled to a comparable seat and human in real life. This can help you with scaling your build to a realistic size.
+1Neato 👍
+5(Also, trailer making hurts for me since like, everyone else has powerful computers, so it actually looks nice ;-;)
Now this is my kind of plane 👍
+1'Noted' to all those requesting a tag.
@IceCraftGaming
+1It's
enableControlSurfacesactually.Quite nice. You should try making fuselage wings at some point in my opinion (don't have to though).
Very interesting.
+2@Walvis
Alright
@Walvis
Actually, just to double check, I'm remaking my G-5D Phantom and I wanted to check with you if the thing I'm planning to change about the design is alright.
I'm intending to change the canopy as it's styled after the Vulcan's, so I'm looking to model it after something the B-66 or the more conventional style of an airliner.
Other then that, the only other thing that will change is the proportions and size of the airframe to be more realistic.
That okay?
Oooo, this is really nice.
@Coolman1000
That's the point....?
Edit 2: Ok...so everything is back to normal..... 🤔
Happy Birthday 👏
+1@SteamPunkPilot
+1In the first 'inputcontroller' section in Overload/XML, there will be an option
zeroOnDeactivate. This should be set to true. Then assign an AG or variable (the variable should be linked to a button, switch or lever) to the engine.@FeatherWing
Edit: Okay, so I've narrowed it down to being specifically an issue with my browser, Opera GX, soo...
@DeveloperKorzalerke
Don't think so. DeathStalker627 pointed out to me on Discord it might be a Domain blocking thing actually.
This is backed I think by the fact I don't have these issues on my iPad.
I'm all in also
+1Well done on getting in 👍
+1Also, the Miro. Looks real, that's how good it is.
I remember this mechanical boi.
Nicely done.
November (19th to be really exact, apparently) is International Men's day.
+5Quite nice, I must say.
+2Nice build
+2(Going to point it out now before someone else does, this is almost identical to the Tornado F.3)
@WaitBreadIsntAfruit
+2well, yeah, I can tell, but my point still stands.
Why 'leave' SP, when you can just not play it...
+4