So let's say I made an O-2 Skymaster a year ago, and I built the Cessna 337D Skymaster, would this still qualify? It's technically the same plane, albeit that the O-2 only has 2 of the 6 seats, the prop hubs are different, and the O-2 has more windows
Cross section? I don't believe it exists, however RADAR systems do detect a surface by how much is exposed and reflected back. In theory, you could detect an aircraft at any range. The F-22 is 35 miles I believe
In SimplePlanes, yes. But SimplePlanes missiles are so unrealistic it's not even funny. Missiles move at Mach 5, much faster than they move in game, and they can't maneuver more than corrective amounts (5 to 15 degrees at most). The fuel only burns for about 1 second, enough to accelerate, and then it glides to its target
My rebuild is a J-III model, not a D model though. Are you okay with that?
.
The only visual difference is that the engineer station has only 1 seat instead of 2 (my OG build had no cockpit though, my redo will), and there is no nose cannon
I'm surprised the mods are on to try and bring them back, but the reason they were disabled almost a year ago was due to a new policy with both Google Play and the App Store in regards to how the code of Unity is allowed to be modified. And as such, they are no longer allowing external Unity modifications
.
However, as Philip stated before, there are source codes you can use to try and modify it yourself, but it could damage the game if you do it wrong
@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat aww mann, you're right. Oh well, a bigger and better one will likely be built after we first get through this upcoming global conflict
@OrderlyHippo aww, thanks, mate!!
I completely agree. I have a ton of designs I have been making lately
.
With some help from another user, Falkenwut, I also have a realistic blueprint for this aircraft I intend on remaking once 1.12 is finalized, and its gonna be a TON better
@realSavageMan she flies super good! For how low the part count is for this type of aircraft, the flaps and slats all are beautiful and feel really realistic. The acceleration and speed is great, and the looks are amazing!
@X99STRIKER
After WW2, Japan seceded the island of Taiwan to the RoC because they let the communist PRC win the war
.
Both countries do not recognize the other, but the UN believes the PRC is the sovereign one. So everyone hates Taiwan, which is dumb considering they are both sovereign
.
Anyways, mods, I promise I am not starting a debate, I'm just explaining the hatred to another user.
@BeastHunter yep! Ik, as I said previously, I was just setting them all up so I could easily put them into the actual post
And cool! Will tag you on the final post, mate
Well, which definition of gay are you referring to? Homosexual or happy? Either way, the person is happy
.
The only thing that is dumb is how much of a wimp you are for making an account just to share this, you delusional arse. Good riddance, mate
It's about drag
The drag calculation effect aircraft differently at different speeds, as there is more compressed air at higher speeds. It's very realistic, actually
.
If you're making a replica, you can check the IbF number on the engine you are using and modify it to the real thrust amount by dividing by the real one to the in game one
.
Plus, drag should be what you change to increase or decrease speed. Changing engine power makes physics go crazy lol
So let's say I made an O-2 Skymaster a year ago, and I built the Cessna 337D Skymaster, would this still qualify? It's technically the same plane, albeit that the O-2 only has 2 of the 6 seats, the prop hubs are different, and the O-2 has more windows
+1Are you using wing guns or an actual cannon part? There are two completely different ways to do this depending
+1Thanks! @Bryan5
+1@X99STRIKER wanna take her for a spin?
+1- Cross section? I don't believe it exists, however RADAR systems do detect a surface by how much is exposed and reflected back. In theory, you could detect an aircraft at any range. The F-22 is 35 miles I believe
- In SimplePlanes, yes. But SimplePlanes missiles are so unrealistic it's not even funny. Missiles move at Mach 5, much faster than they move in game, and they can't maneuver more than corrective amounts (5 to 15 degrees at most). The fuel only burns for about 1 second, enough to accelerate, and then it glides to its target
+1Fisick
+1My rebuild is a J-III model, not a D model though. Are you okay with that?
+1.
The only visual difference is that the engineer station has only 1 seat instead of 2 (my OG build had no cockpit though, my redo will), and there is no nose cannon
I'm surprised the mods are on to try and bring them back, but the reason they were disabled almost a year ago was due to a new policy with both Google Play and the App Store in regards to how the code of Unity is allowed to be modified. And as such, they are no longer allowing external Unity modifications
+1.
However, as Philip stated before, there are source codes you can use to try and modify it yourself, but it could damage the game if you do it wrong
No more than 300!?
+1Anywho, take my upvote mate. I'm participating in like 2 challenges already tho, so I might not make it to this one. Sorry
@PapaKernels 😅 we don't talk about that...
+1@BeastHunter alright. I gotcha mate
+1@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat aww mann, you're right. Oh well, a bigger and better one will likely be built after we first get through this upcoming global conflict
+1@asteroidbook345 😂
+1Where did you get this information?
+1@CharlesDeGaulle this is awesome!! You made some really fast progress lol. T
+1Almost 4K!
+1@Almost indeed. The hydrogen bonds cause water to hydrate itself
+1@HunterStriker XD
+1I did the same thing when I typed that out
This is freaking awesome!!! This is supremely underrated
+1.
Also, are you cool if I borrow these X-4 missiles?
the brackets (
+1[]) are for an alternate text, given that the image does not load correctly@BeastHunter gasp you're doing an alternate history too!?!?
+1yee
+1sick
+1This looks so freaking good, mate!
+1I'm going to go take her for a spin
MMMMM
+1@FeatherWing yeahhh... I understand. It just sucks rather it's so easily taken from great builders
+1.
Thanks!
@Simpleplanesgood99 simp, smh
+1Kidding lol
@OrderlyHippo HERE is the design
+1@OrderlyHippo aww, thanks, mate!!
+1I completely agree. I have a ton of designs I have been making lately
.
With some help from another user, Falkenwut, I also have a realistic blueprint for this aircraft I intend on remaking once 1.12 is finalized, and its gonna be a TON better
HA. Soviet B-29... pfft... totally doesn't exist...
+1.
Tupolev Model 4 intensifies
It is for the automatic download system that processes the performance cost. It's been around for the past few months
+1Put this on the rotator, I hope this helps!
+1TTTT
+1.
This is gorgeous. Do you plan on doing a cockpit with it?
@realSavageMan she flies super good! For how low the part count is for this type of aircraft, the flaps and slats all are beautiful and feel really realistic. The acceleration and speed is great, and the looks are amazing!
+1@Thomasthemaker4 it's called a collab, mate
+1But if I have to pick out of these two, Pe-2
+1@X99STRIKER
+1After WW2, Japan seceded the island of Taiwan to the RoC because they let the communist PRC win the war
.
Both countries do not recognize the other, but the UN believes the PRC is the sovereign one. So everyone hates Taiwan, which is dumb considering they are both sovereign
.
Anyways, mods, I promise I am not starting a debate, I'm just explaining the hatred to another user.
@ReinMcDeer lmao. True, true
+1That is gorgeous, but that last image is cursed >:(
+1@BeastHunter yep! Ik, as I said previously, I was just setting them all up so I could easily put them into the actual post
+1And cool! Will tag you on the final post, mate
@SyntheticL ik! I was just doing this to have them all listed for easier access when the actual post is made
+1@ReinMcDeer yep lmao
+1I've fallen in love with it
@PapaKernels yep! Lol
+1And the massive cockpit... XD
@BeastHunter lol, will do, mi amigo
+1Well, which definition of gay are you referring to? Homosexual or happy? Either way, the person is happy
+1.
The only thing that is dumb is how much of a wimp you are for making an account just to share this, you delusional arse. Good riddance, mate
@WindowsIsBad make the health on the fuselage parts 1
+1It's about drag
+1The drag calculation effect aircraft differently at different speeds, as there is more compressed air at higher speeds. It's very realistic, actually
.
If you're making a replica, you can check the IbF number on the engine you are using and modify it to the real thrust amount by dividing by the real one to the in game one
.
Plus, drag should be what you change to increase or decrease speed. Changing engine power makes physics go crazy lol
At least, detailed for my builds
+1@DieLoaf yeah!
+1I'm like 90% done with a really detailed B-36J-III
@DieLoaf sick!! Convair made some dope aircraft before they dissolved
+1