71.3k MintLynx Comments

  • thebanbehindtheslaughter is back 4.0 years ago

    Holy mackerel that guy is salty.

    +1
  • Graf Spee 4.0 years ago

    You made a better ww2 Warship in under 500 parts than I did in over 1k! Bravo for quality and part efficiency! Only thing is that the Flak is a bit hard to hit anything with, at least in my own tries against distant (Approaching from 10 miles) and nearby (1-2 mile) planes.

    +1
  • Explain your username 4.0 years ago

    Mint Lynx is a sort of online Avatar I developed years ago based on my liking toward Lynxes and the color Green.

    +1
  • Panzer VIII XD Maus 4.0 years ago

    Now this is how you make a meme build, effort and creativity! Even if it's just a little of the latter.

    +1
  • Untersee Boot Type VIID (U-Boat Type VIID) 4.0 years ago

    @STUKAGG I particularly meant you don't see many mine laying submarines built on SP, in fact I think this is the only one. So it's cool to see that!

    +1
  • Ocean 4.0 years ago

    @Gestour Well glad I know that! Built in underwater camera? That's sick! And this time it doesn't auto switch to Orbit camera so that's a nice little thing! Funny how your original underwater mod was superceded by WNP's underwater camera only to see it be superseded by this mod! Working well so far for me, just tested it with my latest submarine so this certainly has my appeal!

    +1
  • A Guide to Building Free Diving Submarines 4.0 years ago

    @WIZARD2017 Well of course Real subs have reverse if that's what you're asking. In modern subs at least I believe it's called 'Back Emergency'.

    +1
  • Nissan R33 GTR (Midnight Purple) 4.0 years ago

    Wow you build these fast! And at such quality, that really makes it impressive.

    +1
  • Echo, Echo, Echo! 4.1 years ago

    @Hira629 A few days, and I've currently got working hatches installed.

    +1
  • Mitsubishi Lancer EX 2000 Turbo 4.1 years ago

    @ChuanLiuBuXi2191 I should try rims next time I make a car.

    +1
  • Mitsubishi Lancer EX 2000 Turbo 4.1 years ago

    @ChuanLiuBuXi2191 It's generally accepted to modify people's builds without permission due to the auto credit, although asking is polite. Go on ahead! I saw your successor and found it interesting that you made it into the more commuter-car original. The hub caps were a nice detail.

    +1
  • A Bunch of Multiplayer Pictures Vol. 1 4.1 years ago

    A fly through mcdonalds...
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Why isn't that on the front page?

    +1
  • Echo, Echo! 4.1 years ago

    @F104Deathtrap The Echo class is an interesting and functional design for sure, although the limitation of having to surface to fire its missiles was a major drawback. These things would most likely struggle to do their job in the event of wartime and been phased out far more quickly for the Charlie class. Still, a cool sub to build for sure! Gonna do some different things to make the P-6 armament function.

    +1
  • Nukes are now possible! No Nuke mod required! 4.1 years ago

    @SheriffHackdogMCPE Yea, I made this months ago before explosion scale in bombs and missiles was even a thing.

    +1
  • Blocc 4.1 years ago

    Aaaah shoot, here we go again.

    +1
  • Mitsubishi Lancer EX 2000 Turbo 4.1 years ago

    @MontyPython I loved branching out as well! It's been fun using what I've learned about building for something different.

    +1
  • Mitsubishi Lancer EX 2000 Turbo 4.1 years ago

    @MontyPython The understeer is present to make this a bit more WASD control friendly. Increasing the turning range on the wheels could help with that.

    +1
  • Is there a way to activate something on fire guns? 4.1 years ago

    Put "FireGuns" into the 'input' category on the Overload menu. Or in the Activation group category if you're using Detachers.

    +1
  • Tupolev Tu-22M 4.2 years ago

    Never looked at these things the same ever since I read 'Red Storm Rising'.

    +1
  • Regarding recent events around a big user here... 4.3 years ago

    @TheSavageManZ It's just a goof post I made on a whim, I mean the title is meant to bait someone into thinking 'oh no another post on you know who'. I didn't think anybody would suspect any sincerity here.

    +1
  • Undo button issues 4.3 years ago

    This is why it's better to just save often and reload the craft when you make an error. Undo button is so impractical to use that it's better ignored.

    +1
  • *Breathes In* 4.3 years ago

    Not bad!

    +1
  • Russian submarine WORKING DIVE 4.3 years ago

    @riko Sometimes it looks as if it doesn't launch, and instead just shoots cannon shells. That might be a sign of depleted missiles though.

    +1
  • Russian submarine WORKING DIVE 4.3 years ago

    Oh, and the visuals aren't bad either. Love the emblem! And the overall design looks unique yet realistic.

    +1
  • You're welcome Andrew. 4.3 years ago

    Andrew has taken a flight right into the uncanny valley.

    +1
  • Richelieu Battleship 4.3 years ago

    @unCANNY Go on ahead! In my opinion it's the best system for aiming guns. Also I could never think of a better name for it than "VTOL and Trim but with WASD", so thanks for that!

    +1
  • USS Arizona Teaser - A walk in the past 4.3 years ago

    Man when you're like me and build them a lot you forget just how big 1:1 scale warship builds really are. Taking a walk on one really goes to show the scale of these ships, I look forward to when she's out!

    +1
  • Un barrage de DCA 4.3 years ago

    @WarHawk95 I decided to utilize your idea though, since it makes for a better title than my Google-Translating xP

    +1
  • Un barrage de DCA 4.3 years ago

    @WarHawk95 I won't lie, I was being a trash and using google translate to gimme the words for 'A Blanket of Flak'.

    +1
  • Un barrage de DCA 4.3 years ago

    @TanksWorldwide It is a Replica of that exact ship. Don't be too scared, it has 0 drag and no drag calculations, so the potential lag is mitigated if not almost entirely gone. Even with the main release over 1000 parts it'll link to a 400 part unlisted version which should be more friendly.

    +1
  • M1A2 Abrams 4.4 years ago

    Pretty well done for a bronze user! Always cool to see the typical expectations of a low point user be broken. The stabilized turret is pretty nice, as is the inclusion of suspension among other details.
    .
    This thing is quite fast though, even for a modern tank. Thus if one takes a hill to fast they'll catch some air that'll kill this thing on impact. The power does make this thing climb like a champ though!

    +1
  • Warhammer Fantasy: steam tank {teaser #3} 4.4 years ago

    Now that is looking beautiful!

    +1
  • Kamov Ka-27 4.4 years ago

    @MrSilverWolf It's cool, like I've said before I'm in no rush. Thanks for helping to test!

    +1
  • Kamov Ka-27 4.4 years ago

    @MrSilverWolf I ain't, I'm keeping my posts slower and sparser to keep this game from sucking me in too much xD. So no rush on your part.

    +1
  • TAV-40 Kodiak 4.4 years ago

    A very nice Radar vehicle! Perfect for putting your radar positions on mountains, given its reaction to mountainous terrain is something along the lines of "What difficult terrain?"

    +1
  • N-6 Class Missile Submarine 4.4 years ago

    Well for a time I was scared this challenge would be a bust, glad you peeps are proving me wrong!

    +1
  • YAMATO 1945 4.4 years ago

    @switdog08 Now that's something I never thought I'd see.

    +1
  • [Closed] Submarine Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @KrAkenAtomic Glad it works well for you! And sorry if it's a bit of a hassle, I just find it more practical to have the Successor system keep track of entries for me.

    +1
  • [Closed] Submarine Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @KrAkenAtomic How about you try rebuilding that thing on the cockpit provided in this post. Simply download the challenge, pull off and delete the fuselage art, and anything you build and upload on that cockpit will be marked as a successor. Also congrats on gold!

    +1
  • IJN Battleship Yamato(Mobile Friendly) 4.5 years ago

    @TheMachinist Have you actually tried downloading it? Drag is pretty much most of if not the entire reason for large builds to lag on phones.

    +1
  • Gato Class Submarine (Pacific WAR Challenge) 4.5 years ago

    @AircraftoftheRedStar Don't know if you find that high by my previous standards, or low by typical standards XD

    +1
  • Messerschmitt P.1079 4.5 years ago

    Very nicely done fuselage, making great use of the hollow fuselages to make the engine visible through the intake. This thing ain't all looks however, flies butter smooth too!

    +1
  • [Closed] Submarine Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @Tang0five @qwerty132 I never said I'd decline piston submarines, and I see no reason why those would be unviable to build in phone.

    +1
  • Alfa Class Submarine 4.5 years ago

    @Quip That old thing? Brings back memories of before I knew the best way to build subs, lol.

    +1
  • Questions About "Names" 4.5 years ago

    The 'Mint Lynx' has been a sort of online avatar of mine for a while now, I just brought it along when I joined here.

    +1
  • Simple Planes World Record: Farthest Destroyed target by Missile. 4.6 years ago

    I see what you did there, putting the cockpit into the SLUAV, clever way to make it all work! I'm curious if you used a winch to keep the SLUAV connected to the alicorn since I couldn't see a line connecting it.

    +1
  • SkyWolf S-10 4.6 years ago

    @MrSilverWolf Also, adding the jet in there to enhance the engine sound is also a nice touch :)

    +1
  • Alfa Class Submarine 4.6 years ago

    @Leonidas1210 Take it apart and look at the functional bits, you might figure things out :) That's been a big part of my learning experience.

    +1
  • Triebflügel 4.6 years ago

    Stable in flight and surprisingly easy to land given the unusual functions. Low part count with simple yet relatively smooth structure, nice build!

    +1