Greetings! It seems like I'm failing to keep up with schedule. My request may seem overconfident, but would you please to move deadline to 1-3 weeks into november? I'll try to finish my BAe Tempest to enter this challenge. If I still won't keep up, then maybe some more builders will submit their entiries...
Greetings! If you accumulate the known specifications of this missile, then here you go: scroll-search for TX-481 model which is the engine of this missile
This old missile can go supersonic only because it's mostly launched from a fixed wing jet aircraft. When launched from a hovering helicopter at low altitude, it goes subsonic. I'll give you a link to a Maverick missile with realistic speeds and thrust... Here it is, I modified it.
Greetings! I strongly suggest you to move the deadline further, because not everyone can make a decent creation in that schedule. Since the design of a stealthy aircraft requires panelling, the fuselage slicing is less helpful compared to a normal creations. And it also requires a fancy internal bays for weaponry and landing gear, and a some funky equations for flight control, thus that kind of build can have a delays like real-life stealth fighters, albeit a bit shorter. As you probably see, all the creations of the participants look rushed.
@XWorks Greetings! Could you please provide a proof to your comment, namely a link, or atleast a name of that plane/it's builder? I tried to find a similar plane among those most upvoted in a year, but did not find any...
Otherwise I assume that you just can't distinguish between a small Ching-Kuo and a YF-23.
Amazing MiG! My only petty complaint is that it's a bit too heavy, it's take-off weight is around 7100kg, while empty weight is 4871kg, according to Airwar.ru
Beautiful, but stealth aircraft, whether Murican, Russian, or Chinese normally have their engine fans hidden by the curved inlet tonnel or radar blockers. It is done because the turbofan's fan part is a round, multi-blade rotating thing which has a large radar reflection if not hidden with something.
Looks awesome, I'll wait for it with patience.
Also, the plane's name sounds like some fancy site. And therefore I suggest you to make a Multirole Integrated Lightweight Fighter as well.
I think this should have been 1.5 times shorter. It's said to be in a form-factor of a Hellfire/SDB, I. E. 180mm caliber and 1,8-2m long, so the stealth aircraft could take two of those in a row in place of each AMRAAM.
Also, come to the link bro, there's a cursed picture of F-35 with those missiles.
https://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=56097&p=426730
Greetings! What are the desired characteristics for an entry? Realism, appearance, ease of operation, destructive power, part efficiency, wholesomeness? For example, how will you judge if someone makes a replica of a cruise missile that is accurate by size'n'weight and range, but is very hard to use from an aircraft that are too small and lightweight because of being just as heavy as it's IRL counterpart is?
I am asking because of having multiple samples of custom guided weaponry in my subassemblies.
@Phoebe Sorry, but definitely not those. That one was more like a vehicle-mounted CIWS with a single 4-5 barrel rottary cannon, while those you proposed here are heavy tanks armed with multiple 6-barrel gatlings.
American F-86 pilot: I seen a damned Mig-15 with variable sweep wing and canards, it scared me!
American psychologist: variable sweep and canard Mig-15 does not exist, it can't hurt you!
Variable Sweep and Canard Mig-15:
Greetings!
This plane is one of the greatest feats of USSR's aircraft design and manufacturing, despite you don't consider it to be one. The only actual resemblance of it with a Ta-183 are the single-engine layout, and even the T-shaped tail of it is quite different. By that "logic", just any single-engine jet fighter from F-86/MiG-15 to even F-35 can be labeled as a copycat of Ta-183. Also, the "RR Nene" engine on the BiS variant is a domestically manufactured and significantly modified variant of it and is called VK-1.
It might be easy to blame them for using british engine, but thou shall remember that this MiG was made only 5 years after the WW2, where USSR suffered losses of 26 million of people, 17 of whom were civilians, since the Nazi Germany managed to establish a deliberate and complex program of genociding women, children, and elders, mainly the Slavic and Jewish. The entire cities were totally wiped out, and the country was brutally torn by war. So, when the British offered their Nene engine, it was truly an unrefusable gift, allowing to save resources and time. The process of studying the Nene was one of the things needed to regenerate and upgrade the USSR's aircraft industry.
Also, this MiG of yours is awesome and special because it uses the 1.11 features.
Greetings! About roll, you can use clamp((Roll/(IAS/135)), -1, 1,) for ailerons. It gradually reduces your aileron input beginning from 135 m/s IAS. But, I think that the roll rate should be pretty high, because those ailerons are quite large. Also, you can watch the Growling Sidewinder on youtube, namely his dogfights witg Mig-15bis and F-86 Sabre. In the DCS, the Sabre has an astonishing roll rate. I thought the Scorpion can have it as well.
I apologise if Irritated you in some way.
About flaps, I hope you found the hidden flapcanards in the nose?
It has a flaws: namely the unworking flaps, unrealistic position of centers of mass and lift. Those flaps are really unworking: there's just sliced fuselage blocks, and no surface to simulate the lift increase flaps normally offer. The hidden wings have bjorken position and only a roll input. Here's even more realistic, FIXED VERSION, update pls! The apperance and part efficiency are awesome though.
Greetings mr. Tarpley! All my cannons somehow lost their target reticles.
I remember that the "cannon" part had it's own collimator-styled round reticle when in game, but now it doesn't. Is that a bug? CLICK TO THE FORUM POST WITH SCREENSHOTS
@PhilipTarpley
Greetings! I preventively apologise for possibly irritating question, but is it possible use those boolean writings to provide a fixed launch sequence for multiple units of custom ordnance? If it is, than how can I implement it? I am just asking because I'd like to implement the ordnance that uses small jet engines to realistically imitate the work of solid fuel engines and pyrocartridges, because i can freely modify the thrust of them, while our basic unguided rocket provides the unchangeable thrust of 500kgf. Also, as it seems to me, the launch sequence of ordnance is oftenly erratic, which is why am I asking you.
SikorsKamov?
I'll test it with different muzzle velocities, from 600 to 2000 m/s...
+2@SemiCollin Thou shall not forget that this plane is made after Ace Combat.
@Bryan5 Hmm, if you're already a subscriber, then a corresponding message should come to you automatically... but I'll tag you.
+1@tarikGR Then, thank you.
+2Greetings! It seems like I'm failing to keep up with schedule. My request may seem overconfident, but would you please to move deadline to 1-3 weeks into november? I'll try to finish my BAe Tempest to enter this challenge. If I still won't keep up, then maybe some more builders will submit their entiries...
+2Peak Simpleplanes moment
Yeet bois
Greetings! If you accumulate the known specifications of this missile, then here you go: scroll-search for TX-481 model which is the engine of this missile
+1This old missile can go supersonic only because it's mostly launched from a fixed wing jet aircraft. When launched from a hovering helicopter at low altitude, it goes subsonic. I'll give you a link to a Maverick missile with realistic speeds and thrust... Here it is, I modified it.
NATF-23 INCOMING!!!
+2Hello fellow JASSM maker!
+1Is that an unmanned replacement for Tu-95?
+1Greetings! I strongly suggest you to move the deadline further, because not everyone can make a decent creation in that schedule. Since the design of a stealthy aircraft requires panelling, the fuselage slicing is less helpful compared to a normal creations. And it also requires a fancy internal bays for weaponry and landing gear, and a some funky equations for flight control, thus that kind of build can have a delays like real-life stealth fighters, albeit a bit shorter. As you probably see, all the creations of the participants look rushed.
+6@XWorks Greetings! Could you please provide a proof to your comment, namely a link, or atleast a name of that plane/it's builder? I tried to find a similar plane among those most upvoted in a year, but did not find any...
Otherwise I assume that you just can't distinguish between a small Ching-Kuo and a YF-23.
@BlackWidowSquadron Sorry, I dont't like Discord. You can post in unlisted and tag me, and I can do the same.
Amazing MiG! My only petty complaint is that it's a bit too heavy, it's take-off weight is around 7100kg, while empty weight is 4871kg, according to Airwar.ru
+1Can one enter the challenge with Polikarpov I-185 M71?
Greetings! I think i can help you with makimg proper photos! I believe this plane should be much more popular than it is now.
Raytheon AIM-199 Mega-Sidewinder.
Beautiful, but stealth aircraft, whether Murican, Russian, or Chinese normally have their engine fans hidden by the curved inlet tonnel or radar blockers. It is done because the turbofan's fan part is a round, multi-blade rotating thing which has a large radar reflection if not hidden with something.
+2Looks awesome, I'll wait for it with patience.
Also, the plane's name sounds like some fancy site. And therefore I suggest you to make a Multirole Integrated Lightweight Fighter as well.
Hooray, now we have a working DIRCM!
+1WW2 Eurofighter Typhoon.
Soviet Meteor go Brrr
I think this should have been 1.5 times shorter. It's said to be in a form-factor of a Hellfire/SDB, I. E. 180mm caliber and 1,8-2m long, so the stealth aircraft could take two of those in a row in place of each AMRAAM.
Also, come to the link bro, there's a cursed picture of F-35 with those missiles.
https://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=56097&p=426730
Behold the swedish meatball!
Finally, I participate!
+2Greetings! What are the desired characteristics for an entry? Realism, appearance, ease of operation, destructive power, part efficiency, wholesomeness? For example, how will you judge if someone makes a replica of a cruise missile that is accurate by size'n'weight and range, but is very hard to use from an aircraft that are too small and lightweight because of being just as heavy as it's IRL counterpart is?
+1I am asking because of having multiple samples of custom guided weaponry in my subassemblies.
Congratulations, you've made a replica of Goalkeeper CIWS!
+3Since the definitions of 5th/6th generations of fighter jets are quite loose, can one enter this challenge with planes like BAe Tempest?
+2It's almost like Stipa-Caproni!
+2Hoho, you're approaching me?
+3Здравствуйте! А не было ли у вас мысли сделать броневичок Ленина?
О, Жигуль!
+2@Axartar It was a relatively realistic vehicle mounted CIWS-alike, coloured in "desert storm" bright brown.
+2@Phoebe Sorry, but definitely not those. That one was more like a vehicle-mounted CIWS with a single 4-5 barrel rottary cannon, while those you proposed here are heavy tanks armed with multiple 6-barrel gatlings.
+1That Comanche ate too much hamburgers...
Hmm, seems good for target practice.
+2Seems like i finally found an "IRL" counterpart to Jundroo's AA Tank.
Greetings! Could you please elaborate what "block" of F-16a is it exactly? Is that a block 15 ADF?
+1I seriously think it can serve as a better and rightful replacement for the default tutorial plane.
+2American F-86 pilot: I seen a damned Mig-15 with variable sweep wing and canards, it scared me!
+1American psychologist: variable sweep and canard Mig-15 does not exist, it can't hurt you!
Variable Sweep and Canard Mig-15:
Greetings!
+8This plane is one of the greatest feats of USSR's aircraft design and manufacturing, despite you don't consider it to be one. The only actual resemblance of it with a Ta-183 are the single-engine layout, and even the T-shaped tail of it is quite different. By that "logic", just any single-engine jet fighter from F-86/MiG-15 to even F-35 can be labeled as a copycat of Ta-183. Also, the "RR Nene" engine on the BiS variant is a domestically manufactured and significantly modified variant of it and is called VK-1.
It might be easy to blame them for using british engine, but thou shall remember that this MiG was made only 5 years after the WW2, where USSR suffered losses of 26 million of people, 17 of whom were civilians, since the Nazi Germany managed to establish a deliberate and complex program of genociding women, children, and elders, mainly the Slavic and Jewish. The entire cities were totally wiped out, and the country was brutally torn by war. So, when the British offered their Nene engine, it was truly an unrefusable gift, allowing to save resources and time. The process of studying the Nene was one of the things needed to regenerate and upgrade the USSR's aircraft industry.
Also, this MiG of yours is awesome and special because it uses the 1.11 features.
@A319enjoyer 🅱️enis 🅱️180 🅱️a🅱️andi
Greetings! About roll, you can use clamp((Roll/(IAS/135)), -1, 1,) for ailerons. It gradually reduces your aileron input beginning from 135 m/s IAS. But, I think that the roll rate should be pretty high, because those ailerons are quite large. Also, you can watch the Growling Sidewinder on youtube, namely his dogfights witg Mig-15bis and F-86 Sabre. In the DCS, the Sabre has an astonishing roll rate. I thought the Scorpion can have it as well.
I apologise if Irritated you in some way.
About flaps, I hope you found the hidden flapcanards in the nose?
It has a flaws: namely the unworking flaps, unrealistic position of centers of mass and lift. Those flaps are really unworking: there's just sliced fuselage blocks, and no surface to simulate the lift increase flaps normally offer. The hidden wings have bjorken position and only a roll input. Here's even more realistic, FIXED VERSION, update pls! The apperance and part efficiency are awesome though.
Greetings mr. Tarpley! All my cannons somehow lost their target reticles.
+1I remember that the "cannon" part had it's own collimator-styled round reticle when in game, but now it doesn't. Is that a bug? CLICK TO THE FORUM POST WITH SCREENSHOTS
@PhilipTarpley
Greetings! What variant of PT6 is it?
Greetings! I preventively apologise for possibly irritating question, but is it possible use those boolean writings to provide a fixed launch sequence for multiple units of custom ordnance? If it is, than how can I implement it? I am just asking because I'd like to implement the ordnance that uses small jet engines to realistically imitate the work of solid fuel engines and pyrocartridges, because i can freely modify the thrust of them, while our basic unguided rocket provides the unchangeable thrust of 500kgf. Also, as it seems to me, the launch sequence of ordnance is oftenly erratic, which is why am I asking you.
Butt Explosive Shit Head?
+1