@Linethesmarty A 2013 Macbook can run it fine. Maybe you're not considering the fact that SP builds can get extremely detailed. Remove the "extra blocks"? Funny of you to say something like that when it's clear you don't recognize craftsmanship. When builders reach a certain point there isn't anything called unecessary parts. Everything is purposeful and there for a reason.
For starters the way you portray it is ridiculous... as if this is some court of government.
.
Your escalation of the problem, your depiction of actions that may not be savory but in no way are to the likes of which you describe them, and your inability to realize that a large community with various personalities will inevitably have different degrees of sensitivity to subjects is counterintuitive to the diversity agenda you are striving for.
.
No community tends to the lowest common denominator (if it even exists). It will always be somewhere in between with various natural compromises, and ability to realize that is a step for mental maturity. While this does sound condescending, you do have to realize your reaction is grossly disproportionate to the issue at hand. Given both sides of the case and that one party acknowledges this lapse in judgement, I see no reason for you to continue your crusade for justice.
.
+A little extras to help you understand a shift in the demographic (or lackthereof). The past year has seen a notable resurgence in a younger audiences for the game... which may contribute to the average mental maturity of a chat group, particularly Discord groups. Add that said demographic has more time on their hands than anyone of advanced age, and you have breeding grounds for a disproportionately higher number of potential "offenses" you might take. The community hasn't changed much... just the people you talk to. That all said, upon further review of the conversation your own responses to others have been as directed and inflammatory as theirs might have... consider your own failings as well.
Well, since Kenneth has decided to pull the trigger and break to you that math does not work that way I'd like to just clarify a couple things.
. explosionScalar implies the explosive power of ordnance is a scalar (constant). Which should already be some red flags as to never perform calculus on it.
Ken did say this, but the derivative of your supposed TNT function (which you claim is exponential) would be some logarithm-related result, which won't really ever be directly proportional to a linear function, unless you meant something else. TNT yields IRL would presumably correlate linearly to the mass of reactant.
Great, this is exactly the kind of implementation I was looking for. I reckon those "noteblock songs" they do in MC could be done also in SP through this.
a. Not very familiar with the engineering world
b. Not sure about how seriously to take this
Let me clarify: this is the equivalent of a 5 year old hitting up a publisher saying that his book idea about a guy flying in a cape is very nice and should be published.
@Brields95
.
I'm not one to take sides, but I do dislike claims made without adequate evidence. Can you provide explicit evidence that fortifies your assertion?
.
Additionally, @AircraftoftheRedStar , I don't see how that particular fable is applicable here. The essence of that story is the idea of constant, diligent work; it does not correspond with the current situation in which a long break was taken for real-life obligations.
.
Of course, his recent actions were nowhere near optimal, but it deviates from the argument at hand.
.
Both of you are clearly jumping the gun, evidently instigated by other individuals who also are making logical leaps.
@MemeLord21 @Bman01 @Ultra0
.
Reason he's making this is to let others build upon the frame as they see fit, clearly he builds what he wants to and is leaving the base frame for open source.
I can't believe you actually figured it out. Rocket-based systems ATGMs in SP have suffered from insane accelerations and speeds that destroy maneuverability, I didn't know it was this elegant of a solution.
@AN2Felllla
.
To begin with, I do agree that this is incredibly basic in essence. I did clarify in the TL;DR that it is no more than annoying trigonometry. Never in the description did I claim to use any complex theory or concept, just applications of simple geometric methods.
.
However, I do have a problem with you labelling this as some form of intellectualism. I dunno where jargon was used except for terms like apothem (although, that's something that most people who've taken a course in geometry will understand). I also left a TL;DR for that explicit purpose. I don't quite understand why you've read through the long version on choice and are pointing out an issue with that. How else do you want me to describe an orthographic projection of a pentagon? Use the adjacent leg of the inclined triangle as the inner radius for the pentagon shape? Besides, that bit is intentionally written as documentation (which, again, is not for average joe).
.
Quite frankly, I don't know what you have against using specific mathematical language because there's an incredible amount of rigor and discipline that I get consequences for not doing otherwise in my normal life. It is genuinely the way I think, and is the most effective way to communicate to others interested in the very specifics of methods I've used.
.
To add, I have not actively expressed an interest in gathering clout amongst the many young people of the community. I build for my enjoyment (this one was really on a whim) and for some others who appreciate it for what it is. I think my demeanor towards KoR and Co. well expresses my stance on that particular matter. Anyhow, thank you for the compliments. I intend to try making a more complex shape next.
@Wi1dSk7
.
Imagine having to delete drama posts as a moderator, having to comment on it because it gets out of hand, and someone bashing on said comment regarding "drama".
@Bob9998
.
Weird. My first "serious" build- one I built when I was not very well known, at bronze, was awarded with 50+ upvotes. Bronze users- more accurately, newer users- tend to lack apt building technique, which prevents them from making the quality builds that most (but not all) platinum builders do.
@Tang0five
.
Oh heck yes! It's as simple as using Overload and writing something in there- every platform has Overload. (A bit more than that, but oh well) If you're not well oriented with the system, I suggest you check out my online guide.
I just can't. This is the best humanoid walker I've ever seen in my time here on SP. It has so much preprogrammed functions, it's just... Wow. All the kudos for the effort.
It's not a bug. It's your design.
+6@Linethesmarty A 2013 Macbook can run it fine. Maybe you're not considering the fact that SP builds can get extremely detailed. Remove the "extra blocks"? Funny of you to say something like that when it's clear you don't recognize craftsmanship. When builders reach a certain point there isn't anything called unecessary parts. Everything is purposeful and there for a reason.
+6@FairFireFlight
+5.
😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳
The reload code can probably be improved if you're willing to use variables. Might make it more reliable
+5For starters the way you portray it is ridiculous... as if this is some court of government.
+5.
Your escalation of the problem, your depiction of actions that may not be savory but in no way are to the likes of which you describe them, and your inability to realize that a large community with various personalities will inevitably have different degrees of sensitivity to subjects is counterintuitive to the diversity agenda you are striving for.
.
No community tends to the lowest common denominator (if it even exists). It will always be somewhere in between with various natural compromises, and ability to realize that is a step for mental maturity. While this does sound condescending, you do have to realize your reaction is grossly disproportionate to the issue at hand. Given both sides of the case and that one party acknowledges this lapse in judgement, I see no reason for you to continue your crusade for justice.
.
+A little extras to help you understand a shift in the demographic (or lackthereof). The past year has seen a notable resurgence in a younger audiences for the game... which may contribute to the average mental maturity of a chat group, particularly Discord groups. Add that said demographic has more time on their hands than anyone of advanced age, and you have breeding grounds for a disproportionately higher number of potential "offenses" you might take. The community hasn't changed much... just the people you talk to. That all said, upon further review of the conversation your own responses to others have been as directed and inflammatory as theirs might have... consider your own failings as well.
@Doge9243
+5.
This is 50 parts. You can run this on a Raspberry Pi or something.
I suppose a pixel decal part might be possible to natively support, then? Either way it indeed is terrifying.
+5@NightmareCorporation
+5.
Someone stole it while I wasn't looking in math class.
Well, since Kenneth has decided to pull the trigger and break to you that math does not work that way I'd like to just clarify a couple things.
.
explosionScalarimplies the explosive power of ordnance is a scalar (constant). Which should already be some red flags as to never perform calculus on it.Ken did say this, but the derivative of your supposed TNT function (which you claim is exponential) would be some logarithm-related result, which won't really ever be directly proportional to a linear function, unless you meant something else. TNT yields IRL would presumably correlate linearly to the mass of reactant.
+5No, you don't get a fully humanlike walk cycle. The elliptical movement does not work like bipedal legs at all.
+5Great, this is exactly the kind of implementation I was looking for. I reckon those "noteblock songs" they do in MC could be done also in SP through this.
+5Incorrect- a very late spotlight can cause such things.
+5@Numbers
.
In case you either are:
a. Not very familiar with the engineering world
b. Not sure about how seriously to take this
Let me clarify: this is the equivalent of a 5 year old hitting up a publisher saying that his book idea about a guy flying in a cape is very nice and should be published.
+5@Brields95
+5.
I'm not one to take sides, but I do dislike claims made without adequate evidence. Can you provide explicit evidence that fortifies your assertion?
.
Additionally, @AircraftoftheRedStar , I don't see how that particular fable is applicable here. The essence of that story is the idea of constant, diligent work; it does not correspond with the current situation in which a long break was taken for real-life obligations.
.
Of course, his recent actions were nowhere near optimal, but it deviates from the argument at hand.
.
Both of you are clearly jumping the gun, evidently instigated by other individuals who also are making logical leaps.
@MemeLord21 @Bman01 @Ultra0
+5.
Reason he's making this is to let others build upon the frame as they see fit, clearly he builds what he wants to and is leaving the base frame for open source.
No.
+5@rainskaos
+5.
Use the script I provided in the comment below.
There is no perfect build.
+5@Random40
.
Set
input=clamp01(ceil(V - IAS))Set
+5Vto any speed limit you want in meters per second.I can't believe you actually figured it out. Rocket-based systems ATGMs in SP have suffered from insane accelerations and speeds that destroy maneuverability, I didn't know it was this elegant of a solution.
+5Not sure if I'm not catching something, but:
Already in the game? The winch part? This was in from 1.8...
Also added in this update, 1.9? Am I the odd one out? This is under the view options button.
I'm not sure what you mean by height, but if it's altitude, it's already a Flight Data input added with 1.9...
Maybe you're a bit out of the loop.
+5Holy moly, thanks Andrew.
+5@SpiritusRaptor Always exploring the limits of game mechanics, I see. Although, this seems pretty darn cool to work with.
+5@Samfpanzer
+4.
What told you SP2 will have bootleg Vizzy? FT is here to stay.
That's really quite creative!
+4Read the patch notes-this is determined by the XML property
+4interactionTypefor buttons. Try setting it toToggle.Very nice job! We all love ourselves a little Tkinter...
+4Needs a lot of FT work, but definitely possible.
+4Very nicely edited video! Glad you enjoyed playing with it :)
+4When SP starts looking like 4k video
+4@F104Deathtrap
+4.
Never, because I provide nothing of actual value for development.
That's actually pretty well done!
+4No wires? How is it powered?
+4E.
+4Magic
+4You've just been blocked. Don't follow dumb trends in the future.
+4Good luck in your future endeavors.
@spefyjerbf
+4.
Indeed entertaining. I think I've provided a lot of people with decent popcorn.
@AN2Felllla
+4.
To begin with, I do agree that this is incredibly basic in essence. I did clarify in the TL;DR that it is no more than annoying trigonometry. Never in the description did I claim to use any complex theory or concept, just applications of simple geometric methods.
.
However, I do have a problem with you labelling this as some form of intellectualism. I dunno where jargon was used except for terms like apothem (although, that's something that most people who've taken a course in geometry will understand). I also left a TL;DR for that explicit purpose. I don't quite understand why you've read through the long version on choice and are pointing out an issue with that. How else do you want me to describe an orthographic projection of a pentagon? Use the adjacent leg of the inclined triangle as the inner radius for the pentagon shape? Besides, that bit is intentionally written as documentation (which, again, is not for average joe).
.
Quite frankly, I don't know what you have against using specific mathematical language because there's an incredible amount of rigor and discipline that I get consequences for not doing otherwise in my normal life. It is genuinely the way I think, and is the most effective way to communicate to others interested in the very specifics of methods I've used.
.
To add, I have not actively expressed an interest in gathering clout amongst the many young people of the community. I build for my enjoyment (this one was really on a whim) and for some others who appreciate it for what it is. I think my demeanor towards KoR and Co. well expresses my stance on that particular matter. Anyhow, thank you for the compliments. I intend to try making a more complex shape next.
미쳤습니까 휴먼?
+4@Brendorkus
.
How? He doesn't "build".
+4Already ingame. Try harder.
+4BMP-2 by @BaconAircraft.
I spent an hour or so keyframing the heck outta the vid. I think it was worth the effort, lol.
+4@shipster
+4.
Haha. Yep, it's me!
Developers cannot magically upgrade your hardware.
+4@Wi1dSk7
+4.
Imagine having to delete drama posts as a moderator, having to comment on it because it gets out of hand, and someone bashing on said comment regarding "drama".
@Bob9998
+4.
Weird. My first "serious" build- one I built when I was not very well known, at bronze, was awarded with 50+ upvotes. Bronze users- more accurately, newer users- tend to lack apt building technique, which prevents them from making the quality builds that most (but not all) platinum builders do.
If you're making 5 a day they can't be of good quality.
+4@Tang0five
+4.
Oh heck yes! It's as simple as using Overload and writing something in there- every platform has Overload. (A bit more than that, but oh well) If you're not well oriented with the system, I suggest you check out my online guide.
I just can't. This is the best humanoid walker I've ever seen in my time here on SP. It has so much preprogrammed functions, it's just... Wow. All the kudos for the effort.
+4@Numbers
+4.
More XML modding = more ways to make the game better