everybody was kung fu fightin
ding ding ding ding dong dong ding
those comments pop up as fast as lightning
ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding
at first it was a little bit frightening
ding ding ding ding dong dong ding
those accusations are sketchy af
ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding
yall are a bunch of bandwagoning men
in bandwagoning town
without much facts and logic but so much to say
everybody was kung fu fightin
ding ding ding ding dong dong ding
.
yall gae for stirring up such dumb drama
the end kbye
Adoption
Delegates from 107 nations agreed to the final draft of the treaty at the end of a ten-day meeting held in May 2008 in Dublin, Ireland.[18] Its text was formally adopted on 30 May 2008 by 107 nations,[19] including 7 of the 14 countries that have used cluster bombs and 17 of the 34 countries that have produced them.[20]
The treaty was opposed by a number of countries that produce or stockpile significant quantities of cluster munitions, including China, Russia, the United States, India, Israel, Pakistan and Brazil.[12] The U.S. has acknowledged humanitarian concerns about the use of cluster munitions, but insisted that the proper venue for a discussion of cluster munitions was the forum attached to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, which includes all major military powers.[21] The U.S. has further stated that the development and introduction of "smart" cluster munitions, where each submunition contains its own targeting and guidance system as well as an auto-self-destruct mechanism, means that the problematic munitions are being moved away from in any case.[12] In 2006, Barack Obama voted to support a legislative measure to limit use of the bombs, while his general election opponent John McCain and his primary opponent Hillary Clinton both voted against it.[22] According to the Pentagon's 2008 policy, cluster munitions are actually humane weapons. "Because future adversaries will likely use civilian shields for military targets – for example by locating a military target on the roof of an occupied building – use of unitary weapons could result in more civilian casualties and damage than cluster munitions," the policy claims. "Blanket elimination of cluster munitions is therefore unacceptable due not only to negative military consequences but also due to potential negative consequences for civilians."[23]
The treaty allows certain types of weapons with submunitions that do not have the indiscriminate area effects or pose the same unexploded ordnance risks as the prohibited weapons. These must contain no more than nine submunitions, and no submunition may weigh less than 4 kilograms (8.8 lb). Each submunition must have the capability to detect and engage a single target object and contain electronic self-destruct and self-deactivation devices.[8] Weapons containing submunitions which each weigh at least 20 kg (44 lb) are also excluded.[9] Australia, which supports the treaty, stated that the convention does not prohibit the SMArt
This It aint cessna but make it cessna... put fairing on it and call it some wacky 1960s marketing term like "omni-dampen" or "land-o-matic" and for the fairing call it "speed-cap" or something along the lines.
Meanwhile in Canada... Hon hon hon, what does vous think about le armored glass?
I'm sorry Pierre, but you cant hear people apologize through armored glass, eh?
@Vincent_
+2yikes sorry about that, i apologize
je m'excuse
Я прошу прощения
Jag ber om ursäkt
謝罪します
道歉
Sweeb
+2decade old nostalgia
+2@Kangy haha no spbc, just the occasional call with some close friends.
+2An IS-3, KPZ-70 and M60A2 walk into a bar...
+2@FairFireFlight careful now or else someone's ganna demonstrate the purpose of the geneva conventions on your forehead
+2Ooogabooga lin alg where
+2@SnoWFLakE0s Popcorn not well seasoned. Too bland. Needs more salt.
+2i see duct tape. but may i ask, WD40 where?
+2this is unacceptable.
chonk
+2Instructions too vague, lacks specificity, form and function. Paneled 480-part smooth tapered part tube instead.
+20/10, trailer does not have deployable ICBM launcher.
+2Damn those tracks are horrible. Whoever made them should be shot.
+2square wheels are superior
+2elongated weeaboo dispensary
+2b
+2he protecc
+2he attacc
but most importantly
he gets crimea bacc
Burn it with fire.
+2Got hit by a nostalgia freight train
+2Q400 is a pencil with a 12cm ruler tapped in the center change my mind
+2@2Papi2Chulo ...and on that note, back to the tent.
+2bruh i legit tried to log in twice to spotlight shitpost and then realised you surpassed me in points. lol
+2Mobile, articulated, tracked, omni-directional pancake griddle
+2@Memri no u
+2better naming convention than 80 yeets
+2everybody was kung fu fightin
+2ding ding ding ding dong dong ding
those comments pop up as fast as lightning
ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding
at first it was a little bit frightening
ding ding ding ding dong dong ding
those accusations are sketchy af
ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding
yall are a bunch of bandwagoning men
in bandwagoning town
without much facts and logic but so much to say
everybody was kung fu fightin
ding ding ding ding dong dong ding
.
yall gae for stirring up such dumb drama
the end kbye
Thotus begoneth
+2Modernized T-34-100 kek
+2Simply beautiful
+2Hey get a PC. )))) problemo solvo
+2Lol imagine using lowecase delta. This message is brought you by the Δxdx and the d/dx gang.
+2color still screams russia lol
nut
ooo gaijib plz gib chally 2 russian 1.0 reserve premium kthx plz gayjoob
+2Need tag for 2000BC incase someone builds the Wan Hu rocket chair. Kthxbye very legit comment. Serious yes
+2(Chi Nu II) II - Electric Boogaloo
+2Adoption
Delegates from 107 nations agreed to the final draft of the treaty at the end of a ten-day meeting held in May 2008 in Dublin, Ireland.[18] Its text was formally adopted on 30 May 2008 by 107 nations,[19] including 7 of the 14 countries that have used cluster bombs and 17 of the 34 countries that have produced them.[20]
The treaty was opposed by a number of countries that produce or stockpile significant quantities of cluster munitions, including China, Russia, the United States, India, Israel, Pakistan and Brazil.[12] The U.S. has acknowledged humanitarian concerns about the use of cluster munitions, but insisted that the proper venue for a discussion of cluster munitions was the forum attached to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, which includes all major military powers.[21] The U.S. has further stated that the development and introduction of "smart" cluster munitions, where each submunition contains its own targeting and guidance system as well as an auto-self-destruct mechanism, means that the problematic munitions are being moved away from in any case.[12] In 2006, Barack Obama voted to support a legislative measure to limit use of the bombs, while his general election opponent John McCain and his primary opponent Hillary Clinton both voted against it.[22] According to the Pentagon's 2008 policy, cluster munitions are actually humane weapons. "Because future adversaries will likely use civilian shields for military targets – for example by locating a military target on the roof of an occupied building – use of unitary weapons could result in more civilian casualties and damage than cluster munitions," the policy claims. "Blanket elimination of cluster munitions is therefore unacceptable due not only to negative military consequences but also due to potential negative consequences for civilians."[23]
The treaty allows certain types of weapons with submunitions that do not have the indiscriminate area effects or pose the same unexploded ordnance risks as the prohibited weapons. These must contain no more than nine submunitions, and no submunition may weigh less than 4 kilograms (8.8 lb). Each submunition must have the capability to detect and engage a single target object and contain electronic self-destruct and self-deactivation devices.[8] Weapons containing submunitions which each weigh at least 20 kg (44 lb) are also excluded.[9] Australia, which supports the treaty, stated that the convention does not prohibit the SMArt
+2Wonderful job. Bravo.
+2This It aint cessna but make it cessna... put fairing on it and call it some wacky 1960s marketing term like "omni-dampen" or "land-o-matic" and for the fairing call it "speed-cap" or something along the lines.
+2@Fighterpilot91 Heh. Started work on this almost a year and a half ago. I don't have too much time on my games.
+2@grantflys When v<66, winch unravels lol.
+2Thanks for calling me gay. +1
+2@Aeromen You are incorrect.
+2I will not be competing the GA challenge with this, as it is 1500 parts.
Wolf is doing the H, as he owns one. I’ll be doing the S. @Chancey21
+2@Hyattorama Yeah that's fine. He makes some amazing mechanisms that I cannot come close to replicating. Great heli you got here though.
+2@Feanor @NazyaMilitare Fixed
+2Meanwhile in Canada...
+2Hon hon hon, what does vous think about le armored glass?
I'm sorry Pierre, but you cant hear people apologize through armored glass, eh?
beep beep lettuce
+2@RYMA232Aeronautics
+2l ll ll L
@DisferGoatz r/whoosh
+2J E F F K A P L A N D O E S N O T A P P R O V E
+2I'm not sure. I use my keyboard to adjust the most of the time so I'm not subject to the snapping at the center.
+2