First of all, the prop pitch is like a car's gearbox
Less torque but more speed. In a high prop pitch the plane gets speed fast, but doesnt get to high velocities
But that of course doesnt matter in SP. The ideal prop pitch is 15°. Four blade props are the best here
Remove drag from the props or make them very low. Higher RPM doesnt mean higher power cuz the game starts bugging. You have to find the sweet spot. Keep in mind these engines always will generate more power at higher physics settings and slow motion
The rotator needs to be put at 1000% speed too. One thing I discovered is that if you put a free-spin rotator behind the "powered" one, it removes all torque
@SILVERPANZER can you please stop believing people hate you? No one hates tanks, and fictional builds have always been welcome. Your builds arent realistic? Yeah and? People like star wars despite it being a physic's torture.
People that dislike your builds are probably envy of you or they cant handle the fact that someone is going off the trend and building on their own terms
You spend too much time feeding your anxiety and paranoia trying to find reasons to hate you, but you should start searching reasons to like yourself. If you dont even try of course you wont find it, and thats what you have been doing.
human brain is the cause
you previously just liked building stuff
now you win upvotes for building stuff
you dislike building stuff and like upvotes now
stop building for upvotes and you wont get bored again
worked for me and science says it works for you (unless youre not human)
@GuardianAerospace Dont wanna argue, but is a Mirage IV an attacker or fighter bomber? Lets be honest, you could just say "Strategic bombers only" instead of hard locking a minimum MTOW.
@Monarchii but I dont™
+1@Monarchii
discovered something about this
if you dive from high altitude and keep rolling, you end up at supersonic speeds and eventually bugs out
managed to reach mach 1.5~
all this stuff is for sp2
SP development ceased long ago
+2@Monarchii For info, did you base the engine size after anything IRL?
hey
will u be fine if I do a "reimagination" of this design?
wanna make it real life worth
google engineering
+1siLver 🤮
+3siver 😎
this is 100% ai written lmao
+4Max of 96 parts, the fewer parts, the more likely it is to spawn, and a max of 10 wing parts (includes structural panels)
From my memory thats it
+1Inspiring and professional article, now can you kindly give me your credit card info? I want to donate so you can continue your amazing work
+1@F16xl Same stuff overall. My grandpa is alr, still in hospital tho
dont
@Monarchii kinda but its pretty convenient and you can compensate for that
Did some experiments with this some years ago
First of all, the prop pitch is like a car's gearbox
Less torque but more speed. In a high prop pitch the plane gets speed fast, but doesnt get to high velocities
But that of course doesnt matter in SP. The ideal prop pitch is 15°. Four blade props are the best here
Remove drag from the props or make them very low. Higher RPM doesnt mean higher power cuz the game starts bugging. You have to find the sweet spot. Keep in mind these engines always will generate more power at higher physics settings and slow motion
The rotator needs to be put at 1000% speed too. One thing I discovered is that if you put a free-spin rotator behind the "powered" one, it removes all torque
Ill do more tests now
+1LMAO
+4MiG-1, 3, 9, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 31, 35
Thats the ones I remember
trimotor fighter 😭
Would variants of ww2 aircraft be allowed?
Stuff like Avia S-199 and Spitfire Mk24
Or adapted fighters for racing
@Saturn0 thanks dude
+1less cursed sea vixen
Macchi C.205
+1ww2 when
SILVERPANZER
plot twist: its winterro
+2@SILVERPANZER Negative
@SILVERPANZER that mentality is keeping you down
+2blackb*rn 🤮
@SILVERPANZER
@SILVERPANZER see the tenth page on your comments list. That aint yourself bro, stop convincing yourself that youre shit.
+1@SILVERPANZER can you please stop believing people hate you? No one hates tanks, and fictional builds have always been welcome. Your builds arent realistic? Yeah and? People like star wars despite it being a physic's torture.
People that dislike your builds are probably envy of you or they cant handle the fact that someone is going off the trend and building on their own terms
You spend too much time feeding your anxiety and paranoia trying to find reasons to hate you, but you should start searching reasons to like yourself. If you dont even try of course you wont find it, and thats what you have been doing.
+1@SILVERPANZER what
+3who hates you
though it was a F9F 😭
+1within 2 seconds in china, a new chinese supersonic airliner, Dingchongdong DCD-11, is revealed, being strangely similar to the Boeing Sonic Cruiser.
+1Final drive:
what the mustard is this
@126 i saw it
human brain is the cause
you previously just liked building stuff
now you win upvotes for building stuff
you dislike building stuff and like upvotes now
stop building for upvotes and you wont get bored again
worked for me and science says it works for you (unless youre not human)
+3@BMilan holy hell thank you
No
what we gonna do?
how do we solve this problem?
do a better thumbnail later
+1loss
Any news at all?
+1nah you reached pyrite :)
+1@GuardianAerospace Mirage IV. Mirage FOUR. Not mirage III, V or any other.
an-2 fighter bomber when
@GuardianAerospace Dont wanna argue, but is a Mirage IV an attacker or fighter bomber? Lets be honest, you could just say "Strategic bombers only" instead of hard locking a minimum MTOW.
The second rule is bullshit. Not all bombers are strategical. Better fix that
+1purple gold!