Accelerates way too quickly, specially that its a 262 and those are known for having notorious acceleration.
you can fix this by reducing drag to ~1.2k and then reducing the engine power to achieve the desired top speed, personally i go one step further and give the engines the real amount of thrust then change the drag points to what makes the top speed realistic.
This is where I had a long break (6-9 months) in this project and started new projects, the KV-1E, a modern frigate, drinking tea, a nazi UFO, a monitor, shoplifting, an anime girl, a modern MBT, warcrimes, a modern APC, a n*ger, a WWII destroyer and a Panzer III. So pretty basic stuff. After all this I picked the project back up.
@Quichenic i can but that would just be milking it, so no
@Varticity there's 1.12 .......
did you pirate the game
+2@SPNonsensical no
@ZWLenning there isn't you just aren't using it write, its an "offset" and you're setting it to 1
@MrAdhmGamer works fine for me on air to air mode
+1Durasmell
a smell that lasts
@BaconAircraft 🅱
+1ah yes, the tank that's designed to survive a nuclear blast's shockwave, i'm impressed with that smooth turret!
+1🅱ondald 🅱rump
@Bruhmomehtjd gone, reduced to atoms.
+1what about triple engine medium bombers? Sm.79 and such
its ok.
+1comical
~~finally, inner peace.~~
+5apache boring
mangusta surpemecy
+1cursed
+5sneg
+1Accelerates way too quickly, specially that its a 262 and those are known for having notorious acceleration.
you can fix this by reducing drag to ~1.2k and then reducing the engine power to achieve the desired top speed, personally i go one step further and give the engines the real amount of thrust then change the drag points to what makes the top speed realistic.
+3@MrShenanigans no they're still physical parts
@BagelPlane too bad now its useless
- yes please
- yes please
- yes please
- go to the weapon in
- eh you can just click on the target.
+3XMLand addfiringDelayin seconds makes the time gap between weapon fires less.I infact, was not curious.
+6Directed by Michael Bay.
+14site provider is the big succ, its been crappy for like 3 months now.
+1i expected a J29 , am mega disappoint
not bad tho
+1boot
+1@X4JB oh my bad
+2you built a WHAT
+4dont scale the navigation ball unevenly, it will stretch when moving too making it weird af
+2the hell is wrong with the fuel probe??? its a straight pipe and far longer
+1jee i wounder why
like if there's a swastika that isn't historical
+6not sure hmMMMMMMMMMM
yes i do want me some SP socks.
+2trucc
+1lol did u do anything than just strip it off all details
@Amirabadi through the XML file , go to
materialsand duplicate the existing lines there@Destroyerz117 just like my brain
PL-8 goes yeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaat
+2keep the pressure on , victory is close!
+9@BogdanX I wasn't (and still not) sure that the early F-16A had roll functions on the elevator , left them out just in case.
@Amazingaviator12 its the highest upvoted build of the month , the HUD isn't mine
@QuitePossiblyMangled do i need to say anything
you saved me from the trouble of making a HUD for my F-16 , I'mma use this kthxbye
mods, its always mods , try disabling some.
the nose of the thing looks completely crooked , fix it please.
+1SimpPlanes
+5@Vincent y tho
+2i think missile trails broke and somehow got swapped for the destroyer's missiles?
+2@JoddyFubuki788 disable your mods and try again
the new atmosphere and fuselage slicing is just enough , this is amazing
+11but missiles still lose guidance after running out of fuel reeedelete this