Looks like a car I made in an old game called Need for Madness, she was called the peregrine, had the same bowed single piece windscreen, markings and overall structure :) so I will say, very, very nice!
Handling, stability, agility: 10 points :: 4 Handles pretty good in the air, however it cannot even take off
Realistic model and behavior: 10 points ::. 8 Very realistic model, reminds me of some Italian planes and behaves like it
Details, paint and other: 10 points :: 5 Paint is very basic but i love the color
Build quality: 10 points :: 7 It looks pretty good however there are some rough edges
Personal impression: 10 points :: 6 First impression is that I love the look of it, but it cannot take off, if you spawn it in the air however it flies decently
Description: 10 points :: 10 Best looking description and the content is textbook. Enjoyed reading about how many were produced, its on par with a war thunder plane description
sorry this is so late, I had a buddy help me with the voting on some of these,
Handling, stability, agility: 10 points :: 7.5/10 "7.5 Flies ok, rudder doesnt seem to function properly" (my buddys words) I'm going to have to agree with the initial score only because the aircraft is exceptionally heavy as a fighter aircraft and feels as if it needs some support fighters, much like the Yak-9T in real life.
Realistic model and behavior: 10 points :: 10/10 "9 decent for a chunky heavy fighter" I personally am going to have to boost this to a 10 because it's extremely in line with its shape, it's speed and attitude are perfect for her shape.
Details, paint and other: 10 points :: 10/10 - "9 very good looking paint scheme" I'm personally going 10/10 because its very, very loyal to old WWII era british fighters, her
Build quality: 10 points :: 8/10 "8 Handles damage pretty good for a heavy fighter" (He misunderstood at this point) though I am going to also go with an 8/10, this is a VERY well done aircraft but its lack of interior cockpit leaves much to be desired.
Personal impression: 10 points :: 9/10 "8 Overall I like the look of the aircraft just wish it had better handling." I'm gonna have to say 9/10, it's unique design, rather stable controls, and modest handling makes it a great aircraft but the interior knocks a point :(
Description: 10 points :: 6/10 "6 Little description compared to what would be expected/compared to others" unfortunately I am going to have to agree, while it is short and sweet to the point, it leaves a lot to be desired about the aircraft.
Sorry, swore I took care of this a month ago! getting around to posting these now -
Handling, stability, agility: 10 points :: 7/10 - Speedwise, this aircraft is neigh perfect for its era and role, however its very... very responsive and agile behaviour pitch-wise feels a little too much for an aircraft at this time period, which ultimately does knock it down a few pegs.
Realistic model and behavior: 10 points :: 9/10 - The N-18 Yanajo has a very pleasing design to it and is very reminecent of the Japanese fighters of WWII, the only reason it doesn't get a full 10 is the flaps feel a tad way too powerful for the aircraft, other than that it's perfect.
Details, paint and other: 10 points :: 10/10 - The aircraft has an excellent example of a classic WWII era camoflauge and suits the plane very well!
Build quality: 10 points :: 10/10 - The amount of love and attention put into this craft not just on the exterior, but the interior as well shows that this wasn't just a quick attempt at entering a challenge, this was a beauty to look at and every detail was very well placed.
Personal impression: 10 points :: 10/10 - I was sold from the thumbnails alone and flying the aircraft was something I enjoyed every second of despite what little flaws she had.
Description: 10 points :: 10/10 - I love the fact that the aircraft was from none of the main countries and helped break the mold and expand the in universe histories, I do with a little more was said, but its not enough of a gripe to take away any points.
Guess who finally got the ability to judge! Sorry it took so long!
Handling, stability, agility: 10 points :: 7/10 whilst the aircraft does have some moderately relaxing speed and fits the time period, I couldn't help but distracted by the aircraft's need to constantly pitch up like it's going to space. that and combined with the issue of a mildly high rate of roll the plane feels akin more to modern fighter jets.
Realistic model and behavior: 10 points :: 8/10 if I didn't know that this was a fictional aircraft I would have thought it would have come right out of WWII, it fits right at home, however as mentioned above, the mobility issues does hamper the aircraft a bit.
Details, paint and other: 10 points :: 11/10 - an insane amount of love and care went into this plane I can tell, I have absolutely no issues with anything I see here, an extra one goes to the well detailed cockpit AND the exhaust flares!
Build quality: 10 points :: 9/10 - The front landing gear feels a little small for the plane, other than that it's practically perfect!
Personal impression: 10 points :: 10/10 Immediately I was drawn to the design of this plane, it's structure immediately reminded me of a classic warbird with a twist and the colors for the camouflage was prime choice!
Description: 10 points :: 10/10 - well written and precise, the touch of RL aircraft adds a little ground to reality and makes the details all the more believable.
@Jabuticaba23 next day or so hopefully I've gotten most the planes tested and everything, but work and lack of internet has made it insanely difficult:/
@FeatherWing yes, terribly sorry, but I've had to move and I still don't have internet where I am, I'm planning on buying a laptop very soon and getting SP and judging, I'm really sorry about the delay.
@FeatherWing It can be a fighter bomber or strike fighter, but it has to at least have fighter capacity, and wing guns being the weapon, not only on wings, that's still a little annoying as a part name, and yes, multiple engines are allowed, and within reason for turbo-props
@AndrewGarrison Oh no thank you so much for fixing this! I really appreciate that! I want everything to be perfect for all users so that is extremely helpful! thank you so much again
@Mustang51 thank you! I'll definitely start working on something of the sort as soon as possible
+1@Mustang51 I greatly appreciate those kind words :) thank you, and thank you for the follow!
+1I love it! it kinda reminds me of the Night witch I made a few months back :)
+1When are we getting another Tournament?
+1I've made an entry for this challenge :)
+1Fourth place, I'm super happy with that :D Thank you for doing this challenge!
+1Totally getting an EDI vibe from it, I love it!
+1@diegoavion84 That was a lot of fun :D
+1Looks like a car I made in an old game called Need for Madness, she was called the peregrine, had the same bowed single piece windscreen, markings and overall structure :) so I will say, very, very nice!
+1@yoshicraze I did draw some inspiration from that :)
+1@Dusty51104 Thank you :D
+1and Thank you @JohnnyBoythePilot!
@Minecraftpoweer thanks :D I greatly appreciate it!
+1@Mudkip you've got to be real careful with the bomb load, when I get off work I'll redo the payload system.
+1@WaterDrinker400 E indeed
Starting to think SP in general has been forgotten.
I was waiting to see one of these XD love it!
I was waiting to see one of these XD love it!
I was waiting to see one of these XD love it!
G.L.300 I
Handling, stability, agility: 10 points :: 4 Handles pretty good in the air, however it cannot even take off
Realistic model and behavior: 10 points ::. 8 Very realistic model, reminds me of some Italian planes and behaves like it
Details, paint and other: 10 points :: 5 Paint is very basic but i love the color
Build quality: 10 points :: 7 It looks pretty good however there are some rough edges
Personal impression: 10 points :: 6 First impression is that I love the look of it, but it cannot take off, if you spawn it in the air however it flies decently
Description: 10 points :: 10 Best looking description and the content is textbook. Enjoyed reading about how many were produced, its on par with a war thunder plane description
Overall: 40/60
AF 213 A
Handling, stability, agility: 10 points :: 7 Very stable flight model just doesnt turn as well as I wanted it to
Realistic model and behavior: 10 points ::. 7 Looks like a plane that would've been made in that time period, fits the timeline well
Details, paint and other: 10 points :: 6 Love the color combinations, however it is bland compared to others,
Build quality: 10 points :: 8 Plane looks very good however the tail didn't get as much love as other parts on this aircraft is.
Personal impression: 10 points :: 9 First impressions were that I loved the look and design of this plane and that It flew pretty good
Description: 10 points :: 9 Very good description length and filled with good content, looking forward to the jet design of this aircraft
Overall: 46/60
Handling, stability, agility: 10 points :: 5.5, plane stalls out in turns and will crash, engine doesnt seem powerful enough
Realistic model and behavior: 10 points ::. 6 Realistic looking plane yes, but unrealistic flight charateristics
Details, paint and other: 10 points :: 7 Bland paint job, two tone but atleast theres markings
Build quality: 10 points :: 8 Plane doesnt seem to have any wobbling or wiggiling around parts
Personal impression: 10 points :: 6 first impressions i was looking forward to flying her, afterwards I'm a bit disappointed but I like the design
Description: 10 points :: 6 Little description compared to what was expected/other people had
Overall: 38.5/60
sorry this is so late, I had a buddy help me with the voting on some of these,
Handling, stability, agility: 10 points :: 7.5/10 "7.5 Flies ok, rudder doesnt seem to function properly" (my buddys words) I'm going to have to agree with the initial score only because the aircraft is exceptionally heavy as a fighter aircraft and feels as if it needs some support fighters, much like the Yak-9T in real life.
Realistic model and behavior: 10 points :: 10/10 "9 decent for a chunky heavy fighter" I personally am going to have to boost this to a 10 because it's extremely in line with its shape, it's speed and attitude are perfect for her shape.
Details, paint and other: 10 points :: 10/10 - "9 very good looking paint scheme" I'm personally going 10/10 because its very, very loyal to old WWII era british fighters, her
Build quality: 10 points :: 8/10 "8 Handles damage pretty good for a heavy fighter" (He misunderstood at this point) though I am going to also go with an 8/10, this is a VERY well done aircraft but its lack of interior cockpit leaves much to be desired.
Personal impression: 10 points :: 9/10 "8 Overall I like the look of the aircraft just wish it had better handling." I'm gonna have to say 9/10, it's unique design, rather stable controls, and modest handling makes it a great aircraft but the interior knocks a point :(
Description: 10 points :: 6/10 "6 Little description compared to what would be expected/compared to others" unfortunately I am going to have to agree, while it is short and sweet to the point, it leaves a lot to be desired about the aircraft.
Overall: 50.5/60
Sorry, swore I took care of this a month ago! getting around to posting these now -
Handling, stability, agility: 10 points :: 7/10 - Speedwise, this aircraft is neigh perfect for its era and role, however its very... very responsive and agile behaviour pitch-wise feels a little too much for an aircraft at this time period, which ultimately does knock it down a few pegs.
Realistic model and behavior: 10 points :: 9/10 - The N-18 Yanajo has a very pleasing design to it and is very reminecent of the Japanese fighters of WWII, the only reason it doesn't get a full 10 is the flaps feel a tad way too powerful for the aircraft, other than that it's perfect.
Details, paint and other: 10 points :: 10/10 - The aircraft has an excellent example of a classic WWII era camoflauge and suits the plane very well!
Build quality: 10 points :: 10/10 - The amount of love and attention put into this craft not just on the exterior, but the interior as well shows that this wasn't just a quick attempt at entering a challenge, this was a beauty to look at and every detail was very well placed.
Personal impression: 10 points :: 10/10 - I was sold from the thumbnails alone and flying the aircraft was something I enjoyed every second of despite what little flaws she had.
Description: 10 points :: 10/10 - I love the fact that the aircraft was from none of the main countries and helped break the mold and expand the in universe histories, I do with a little more was said, but its not enough of a gripe to take away any points.
Overall: 56/60
Guess who finally got the ability to judge! Sorry it took so long!
Handling, stability, agility: 10 points :: 7/10 whilst the aircraft does have some moderately relaxing speed and fits the time period, I couldn't help but distracted by the aircraft's need to constantly pitch up like it's going to space. that and combined with the issue of a mildly high rate of roll the plane feels akin more to modern fighter jets.
Realistic model and behavior: 10 points :: 8/10 if I didn't know that this was a fictional aircraft I would have thought it would have come right out of WWII, it fits right at home, however as mentioned above, the mobility issues does hamper the aircraft a bit.
Details, paint and other: 10 points :: 11/10 - an insane amount of love and care went into this plane I can tell, I have absolutely no issues with anything I see here, an extra one goes to the well detailed cockpit AND the exhaust flares!
Build quality: 10 points :: 9/10 - The front landing gear feels a little small for the plane, other than that it's practically perfect!
Personal impression: 10 points :: 10/10 Immediately I was drawn to the design of this plane, it's structure immediately reminded me of a classic warbird with a twist and the colors for the camouflage was prime choice!
Description: 10 points :: 10/10 - well written and precise, the touch of RL aircraft adds a little ground to reality and makes the details all the more believable.
Overall: 55/60
@Jabuticaba23 next day or so hopefully I've gotten most the planes tested and everything, but work and lack of internet has made it insanely difficult:/
@FeatherWing yes, terribly sorry, but I've had to move and I still don't have internet where I am, I'm planning on buying a laptop very soon and getting SP and judging, I'm really sorry about the delay.
@FeatherWing TAS
@FeatherWing will do once I have time
@FeatherWing Maybe the 20th
@TWDDerSharkmarine actually I was considering extending the deadline another week or so since I've been swamped at work! Take your time on it!
@CerberusWorks I don't have a max, though I'd prefer it not be absurdly high
@TheRedBaron2 I would preferably have it where health is unmodified outside special criteria
@DragoransEscarti Sure! as long as it's reasonable
@FeatherWing For the most part Nordenvok uses the standard british-esque liveries. but some like bombers use swede based.
@CerberusWorks I would very much prefer utilizing the nations that are available.
@AviationCat007 I did, however I would really appreciate it if it was a successor to this post so I can find it easily when judging later.
@Aviator01 If its within reason
@FeatherWing It can be a fighter bomber or strike fighter, but it has to at least have fighter capacity, and wing guns being the weapon, not only on wings, that's still a little annoying as a part name, and yes, multiple engines are allowed, and within reason for turbo-props
@Locurapuntocom yeah I copy pasted from my bomber challenge from a couple years ago, will have to fix that
@Locurapuntocom Not going to put a limiter on there, just as long as it's not too much where it explodes my Gaming PC lol
@Locurapuntocom Yup, dropping that max limit now
@Locurapuntocom what do you mean? Edit: seeing your builds and what you're capable of, yeahhh I'm dropping the max limit lol
@rexzion ah crap that's from the old challenge, ignore that
@catzilla I look forward to it!
@AndrewGarrison Oh no thank you so much for fixing this! I really appreciate that! I want everything to be perfect for all users so that is extremely helpful! thank you so much again
@Karzigg Somewhat yeah lol,
@ThomasRoderick Fixed some performance issues, I believe that it should be more... reliable.
@Tsuchiisan Huh, I've never heard of that plane before, just looked it up, I can see it lol. and yeah I couldn't quite get the Camo right on her.
@MrResource The M4 Sherman had roughly 49,000, so it's not that unreasonable.
@MrResource @meteorbook345 I actually based it more off the Pershing and the M22.