Not to be patronising but the issue is a lot of simpleplanes community is very childish and basically can't seem to deal with the responsibility of having any power. It's just crazy - I come back after a few months and almost every single person I knew has a completely different name and I can barely work out who anyone is - takes away from the community aspect when you might run into the same person three times with three different names and not realise they're the same person.
I think 3552 parts is way too many parts than this needed. As it is, nobody can use it; which leads me to suppose that the only reason this exists is as basically a very complex and beautiful structure which doesn’t actually have a practical use; which is fine. It’s like a sculpture.
I've been here since the start of the game and SP has 'died' about 10 times! SP is only alive because of amazing community which is still here 6 years on! Thanks for making this game great everyone!
I originally made this with the intention of creating the best cockpit ever made in SP. As far as I am aware even in its unfinished state it is? Keep in mind that literally everything is functional. The display, every switch, the throttle, the knobs, the artificial horizon... etc. Correct me if I’m wrong and provide a link.
You are being ridiculous. This was incredibly innovative and revolutionised SP at the time of its making. This aircraft set the blueprint for the creations we have today. The tools which we had to make planes back when this was made were very primitive; and this looked better than anything people had seen before. @Johawks1976
I didn't realise Andrew was in support of censorship, totally lost respect for him now. This mentality where you can't have any point of view against the 'norm' is probably the absolute worst mentality you could have. Free speech - that's all I have to say.
Also your view on BLM is absolutely right, it's done nothing but increase racial tensions and put peoples group identity (race) ahead of their individual identity (character) which is exactly the opposite of what MLK wanted.
I disagree, I think even on the Internet people should try and use proper grammar otherwise sometimes you can’t understand what they say and they have ridiculous run-on sentences.
If you are transgender, you are the gender you were born as; though with surgical operations done to mutilate and add or remove artificial appendages. Who a person feels like they are is a different matter; In purely anatomical terms, they are biologically either male or female. @Gravity
This is unbelievably good for something made in simpleplanes... if the game was actually like this then I think it would probably be one of the most popular ww2 games. I'm at a loss for words, I know how hard this must have been! Devs please make the game look and function like this!!
Obviously it's not true that anyone can make a plane good with 1000 parts because otherwise everyone would do it. You don't need to drag down builds with lots of parts to justify low part builds. @Dathcha
Yeah it's not funny but what kind of moderation is this - subjectively deciding that something is 'low effort' and removing it. As long as something is not immoral people should have the freedom to upload anything they want, that's ridiculous that you would censor the builds people can put up just because you think it's not funny anymore
I understand - I just hope the devs will put your amazing mod to use in an update or something like that. It really is one of the best mods SP has ever seen.
What I’m angry about is the fact that they missed with the chance of multiplayer with SP, and then didn’t learn from their mistakes with SR2. All I want is a 3v3 battle mode with 10-15 part AI planes and just one (or two if your PC is good) online friend. I would love that so much, but it’ll never happen now. I can’t believe that after all this time and after so many people asking for any kind of multiplayer they still haven’t added it. I’m shaking my head honestly.
I saw someone claiming there were 80... I guess there are as many genders as there are physical objects to identify as... it’s just so stupid! @TheDerpingMemes
No, apple won't let it happen because mods run executable code which theoretically could be viruses and apple prides itself on virus security. On android - they used to have mod support but they don't anymore. Not sure if it will ever come back.
It doesn't say anything in the rules about mentioning other players in posts - also he was asking BogdanX to stop deleting forums. Is it ok to pluck new rules out of the air when you're a moderator and is it not ok to specifically ask a user to stop doing something? @EternalDarkness
This ones a big one - the ability to make scenarios. For example one team with 5 aircraft and another team with 3 aircraft and a destroyer. Of course this would need better AI and better optimisation to work but the possibilities would be endless and really cool.
It would have prevented a lot of people deleting their account in a hissy fit only to regret it half an hour later and then make an alt... like almost every big account that’s been deleted.
Even on the non-detailed aircraft, not everyone has time to download all of the builds that they like, but still respect the amount of work that went into it; so they just leave an upvote.
Define "ultimate sandbox game"... to me the ultimate sandbox game would mean you can realise theoretical ideas in a way that isn't extremely janky or flat out impossible. When it comes to an aircraft building game, I would like to choose gun type, ammunition storage, painted on decals and camo schemes and engine types.
SP is not, in any sense, the ultimate sandbox games. It is extremely limiting and is completely missing some features. I look forward to FlyOut, I'll watch development with interest. @ollielebananiaCFSP
Is this ever going to happen? You shouldn't start a tournament if you can't finish it, I put a lot of effort into my entry and now I can see it was for nothing. @DJ2keroni
I don't understand - people are still submitting their planes over a week after the deadline - when will this finish and when will the dogfights start? @DJ2keroni
Ive been playing your games for ages, and you guys have such a special connection with your fan base. I’ve never seen any other Dev team so involved with their community, so I just want to thank you so much for doing what you do. :)
It’s not whining, you two are actually ridiculous. Stop creating a problem where there isn’t one, and move on. If it wasn’t for your uncalled for and useless reply that comepletely missed the point of my comment (where I wasn’t complaining! For the last time!), this would have never happened. @BaconAircraft @Blue0Bull
I’m not complaining, and I don’t want to build one myself. You are completely missing the point. The fact is, nobody can feasibly use this on an actual plane because of its part count, so it’s not practical. Instead, it’s more like a beautiful and intricately detailed statue which, as nice-looking as it may be, cannot be practically used. @BaconAircraft
God, it’s just ridiculous how even google is hopping on this train of attention seeking prats saying they identify as whatever they want to.
+17Worst pirate I've ever seen...
+11Not to be patronising but the issue is a lot of simpleplanes community is very childish and basically can't seem to deal with the responsibility of having any power. It's just crazy - I come back after a few months and almost every single person I knew has a completely different name and I can barely work out who anyone is - takes away from the community aspect when you might run into the same person three times with three different names and not realise they're the same person.
+11I think 3552 parts is way too many parts than this needed. As it is, nobody can use it; which leads me to suppose that the only reason this exists is as basically a very complex and beautiful structure which doesn’t actually have a practical use; which is fine. It’s like a sculpture.
+11I've been here since the start of the game and SP has 'died' about 10 times! SP is only alive because of amazing community which is still here 6 years on! Thanks for making this game great everyone!
+10I originally made this with the intention of creating the best cockpit ever made in SP. As far as I am aware even in its unfinished state it is? Keep in mind that literally everything is functional. The display, every switch, the throttle, the knobs, the artificial horizon... etc. Correct me if I’m wrong and provide a link.
+10You are being ridiculous. This was incredibly innovative and revolutionised SP at the time of its making. This aircraft set the blueprint for the creations we have today. The tools which we had to make planes back when this was made were very primitive; and this looked better than anything people had seen before. @Johawks1976
+10I didn't realise Andrew was in support of censorship, totally lost respect for him now. This mentality where you can't have any point of view against the 'norm' is probably the absolute worst mentality you could have. Free speech - that's all I have to say.
Also your view on BLM is absolutely right, it's done nothing but increase racial tensions and put peoples group identity (race) ahead of their individual identity (character) which is exactly the opposite of what MLK wanted.
+9I disagree, I think even on the Internet people should try and use proper grammar otherwise sometimes you can’t understand what they say and they have ridiculous run-on sentences.
+9If you are transgender, you are the gender you were born as; though with surgical operations done to mutilate and add or remove artificial appendages. Who a person feels like they are is a different matter; In purely anatomical terms, they are biologically either male or female. @Gravity
+9What does discord have to do with Andrew Garrison?
+8Is it just me or are mods kind of carrying Simpleplanes right now?
+7Yeah, there’s up to a 30 year jail penalty for building replicas of private planes on SP @Planefun
+7What about general knowledge instead of maths? Might genuinely be interesting
+6This is unbelievably good for something made in simpleplanes... if the game was actually like this then I think it would probably be one of the most popular ww2 games. I'm at a loss for words, I know how hard this must have been! Devs please make the game look and function like this!!
+6Also the dogfight mode needs to be able to set up 2v2 or 3v3 fights and game modes like defend the carrier modes... etc
+6Obviously it's not true that anyone can make a plane good with 1000 parts because otherwise everyone would do it. You don't need to drag down builds with lots of parts to justify low part builds. @Dathcha
+5Yeah it's not funny but what kind of moderation is this - subjectively deciding that something is 'low effort' and removing it. As long as something is not immoral people should have the freedom to upload anything they want, that's ridiculous that you would censor the builds people can put up just because you think it's not funny anymore
+5What Andrew has done is disgusting and it's exactly this kind of mentality that is bringing down Western Society...
+5I understand - I just hope the devs will put your amazing mod to use in an update or something like that. It really is one of the best mods SP has ever seen.
+5Damn I remember being so hyped about this, hard to believe it was 3 years ago...
+5What I’m angry about is the fact that they missed with the chance of multiplayer with SP, and then didn’t learn from their mistakes with SR2. All I want is a 3v3 battle mode with 10-15 part AI planes and just one (or two if your PC is good) online friend. I would love that so much, but it’ll never happen now. I can’t believe that after all this time and after so many people asking for any kind of multiplayer they still haven’t added it. I’m shaking my head honestly.
+5You need to update your apps!
+5I saw someone claiming there were 80... I guess there are as many genders as there are physical objects to identify as... it’s just so stupid! @TheDerpingMemes
+5Oh well, it’s in the past now :) @Chancey21
+5What? It doesn’t work anymore, I said it used to work in earlier versions of SP @danman12
+5No, apple won't let it happen because mods run executable code which theoretically could be viruses and apple prides itself on virus security. On android - they used to have mod support but they don't anymore. Not sure if it will ever come back.
+4It doesn't say anything in the rules about mentioning other players in posts - also he was asking BogdanX to stop deleting forums. Is it ok to pluck new rules out of the air when you're a moderator and is it not ok to specifically ask a user to stop doing something? @EternalDarkness
+4This ones a big one - the ability to make scenarios. For example one team with 5 aircraft and another team with 3 aircraft and a destroyer. Of course this would need better AI and better optimisation to work but the possibilities would be endless and really cool.
+4@MidnightSun That says more about your bad taste than anything else
+4It would have prevented a lot of people deleting their account in a hissy fit only to regret it half an hour later and then make an alt... like almost every big account that’s been deleted.
+4Nice, but when you make trucks; please scale it down to 1:1
+4There is no such thing as a perfect buil-
+4In what world would a pilot ever leave an airport without knowing for sure that they have enough fuel to reach their destination?
+4Even on the non-detailed aircraft, not everyone has time to download all of the builds that they like, but still respect the amount of work that went into it; so they just leave an upvote.
+4Thanks, that’s great to hear @Awsomur
+4Define "ultimate sandbox game"... to me the ultimate sandbox game would mean you can realise theoretical ideas in a way that isn't extremely janky or flat out impossible. When it comes to an aircraft building game, I would like to choose gun type, ammunition storage, painted on decals and camo schemes and engine types.
SP is not, in any sense, the ultimate sandbox games. It is extremely limiting and is completely missing some features. I look forward to FlyOut, I'll watch development with interest. @ollielebananiaCFSP
+3lmao new SP players are spoiled @PevertzJJ
+3Is this ever going to happen? You shouldn't start a tournament if you can't finish it, I put a lot of effort into my entry and now I can see it was for nothing. @DJ2keroni
+3Very true
+3I don't understand - people are still submitting their planes over a week after the deadline - when will this finish and when will the dogfights start? @DJ2keroni
+3Not to be a dampener but wars endings are a bit more complex and nuanced than 'the last enemy solider was killed in a tank explosion'.
+3It’s very hard to run for full desktops, let alone a mobile device... @TheMitsuboshiBoi
+3Definitely turrets that target enemies independent of player control
+3That looks incredible! Shame I can’t use it :(
+3Ive been playing your games for ages, and you guys have such a special connection with your fan base. I’ve never seen any other Dev team so involved with their community, so I just want to thank you so much for doing what you do. :)
+3I’m building a cargo plane. It’s currently on 1650 parts, but I am building it on mobile; so technically it’s mobile-friendly.
+3It’s not whining, you two are actually ridiculous. Stop creating a problem where there isn’t one, and move on. If it wasn’t for your uncalled for and useless reply that comepletely missed the point of my comment (where I wasn’t complaining! For the last time!), this would have never happened. @BaconAircraft @Blue0Bull
+3I’m not complaining, and I don’t want to build one myself. You are completely missing the point. The fact is, nobody can feasibly use this on an actual plane because of its part count, so it’s not practical. Instead, it’s more like a beautiful and intricately detailed statue which, as nice-looking as it may be, cannot be practically used. @BaconAircraft
+3Then why don’t you understand it? @Johawks1976
+3