@BeefyBoy4516 @Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing Thanks! This was a great build, so it was an honor to work on it. Collaborating with skilled players is always thrilling for me! It's too bad that I don't have much time for collabs anymore.
@QuantausAviation I might make more weapons. Of course, you can always extract them from my recent builds. They are normally quite unique in each build.
A canopy tutorial would be a nice thing to have. Perhaps I might record myself building one sometime. As for bodies, that may be best to explore individually. Everyone builds bodies differently, so there is no single "right" way to build an aircraft body.
Add images into aircraft descriptions exactly how you would in a forum post. I would include the image format syntax, but I can't use that fancy red text on my phone. Perhaps someone else will give you that formatting help.
@JangoTheMango Thank you. I posted this when the community was a little more chaotic than now. I'm not great at writing, but I somehow wrote this quite well.
@Strikefighter04 Sure! I took the screenshots in this map. I then used PowerPoint to add text and logos (shapes). I then used paint to convert the PowerPoint slide into a .png file.
Interesting. A very original design (assuming that this is fictional). I think that the canopy can be smoothed out a bit, but this is otherwise a very good build. Good job!
Well, I build to simply pass the time. I enjoy bringing an idea to life, and find SP to be a relaxing way to do that. Your builds are fine, especially that glider. It looks good! When my profile was two months old, I was uploading builds that looked like this. I think that your style is a bit more refined than mine was at that time. Also, if you haven't already tried it, try building a fictional plane. You might enjoy it!
@AstleyIndustries I'm glad that you like it. You were doing amazing things with the photographer's map, and your graphics inspired me to release this map.
@ThomasRoderick I predicted that you would ask something along those lines. I modeled the aircraft after a few WWII bombers, so it won't be necessarily up to modern standards.
@Chancey21 @JohnnyBoythePilot @BaconRoll Here it is! Uploaded, and tagged upon your request. I sincerely hope that you enjoy flying it!
@Johawks1976 @FastDan @Alpha029 I have uploaded it, and tagged you as requested!
+1@BeefyBoy4516 @Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing Thanks! This was a great build, so it was an honor to work on it. Collaborating with skilled players is always thrilling for me! It's too bad that I don't have much time for collabs anymore.
@Jerba I have no idea. I haven't built it yet.
These are always amusing. I haven't been to active, but I still wonder what I would be in this list.
@QuantausAviation I might make more weapons. Of course, you can always extract them from my recent builds. They are normally quite unique in each build.
@Jerba Oh yeah, it's vtol. My next build might coincidentally be like that, so yes, I will probably build a vtol transport.
@Jerba Volt transport? I'm not sure what that is.
@CruzerBlade Thank you! Thankfully the drag from the decals is similar on each side, and with the mass of the bomber, the uneven force is negligible.
@ThePilotDude @JangoTheMango Thanks! I tried to give it some... character with those decals.
@EliteArsenals24 Thanks! I'm certainly not quitting. Life has just been hectic, but fun. When I calm down, I'll play more SP.
@F4f879 Ha! I didn't think anyone would notice that.
+1@Strikefighter04 I definitely understand that. I might include a "factory version" that doesn't have all the decals.
Looks fun! I won't have time to enter, but I hope that plenty of other people do.
@RaendyLeBeau Thank you! I try my best to make the build, as well as related content, to look as good as possible.
@SpicyViper Thanks! I don't have many green laser weapons, but I do have this. It's niche in function, so I'm not sure if you will find it too useful.
@CrashFighter05 Probably not. Not much was changed between the two versions. The streamlined versions, however, had the most change.
I forgot the exact device, but it's max part count was maybe 200.
@SorrowScarlet Probably file size. It's a massive file.
@ChromeGamer25 I'll think of putting that in the next essentials post. Thanks!
+1I like the strike pack functionality. Very clever. As a side note, I think your answer to Baldeagle086's question might have confused them.
+2A pleasant sight in my jetstream. Nice job with this one, and good job on the description!
A canopy tutorial would be a nice thing to have. Perhaps I might record myself building one sometime. As for bodies, that may be best to explore individually. Everyone builds bodies differently, so there is no single "right" way to build an aircraft body.
Add images into aircraft descriptions exactly how you would in a forum post. I would include the image format syntax, but I can't use that fancy red text on my phone. Perhaps someone else will give you that formatting help.
@KingOfZeta If you have an android device or a pc, download WNP8's overload mod. Then XML will be easy!
@KingOfZeta Armor is pretty easy to make now, because part health can be XML modded.
I might participate. It all depends on how busy I am.
Looks awesome. Very unique in design.
+1@JangoTheMango I suppose. There are a lot of kids here, too, so I guess it's best to be patient with the site.
+1Excellent. You continue to produce masterpieces!
@JangoTheMango Thank you. I posted this when the community was a little more chaotic than now. I'm not great at writing, but I somehow wrote this quite well.
@KingOfZeta As of 1.7, this armor no longer works.
Useful, but I wouldn't call it lift. It's just balancing thrust force to work with an existing airframe, I guess.
+1Looks good. The large span is interesting.
@Strikefighter04 Sure! I took the screenshots in this map. I then used PowerPoint to add text and logos (shapes). I then used paint to convert the PowerPoint slide into a .png file.
+1@AWESOMENESS360 Thanks! I wasn't sure that it could run on mobile, so I'm pleased to know that it does.
Ah. I knew one of these things was going to be re-created in SP. well done on this replica. It looks great!
Excellent work!
Looks great! It deserves a little more attention, so I'll spotlight it.
@AWESOMENESS360 Thanks! I always try to minimize my part counts. That way, more people can fly my planes.
+3Thanks! It's somewhat complex, but I really just spammed structural panels.
Interesting. A very original design (assuming that this is fictional). I think that the canopy can be smoothed out a bit, but this is otherwise a very good build. Good job!
Well, I build to simply pass the time. I enjoy bringing an idea to life, and find SP to be a relaxing way to do that. Your builds are fine, especially that glider. It looks good! When my profile was two months old, I was uploading builds that looked like this. I think that your style is a bit more refined than mine was at that time. Also, if you haven't already tried it, try building a fictional plane. You might enjoy it!
+2Nicely done. Beautiful and functional. Good work!
+1@Awsomur It's ok to use sources, so long as they are properly cited. Perhaps random citizens aren't the best sources to use though.
+1Imgur and steam
@TheTekkit101 No problem. I saw an opportunity to make something unique with those wheels, so i did.
@Ryn176 It wasn't supposed to do that. The custom map is going to be the same as the green screen map, though. Sorry about that.
+1@AstleyIndustries I'm glad that you like it. You were doing amazing things with the photographer's map, and your graphics inspired me to release this map.
@ThomasRoderick I predicted that you would ask something along those lines. I modeled the aircraft after a few WWII bombers, so it won't be necessarily up to modern standards.
+2