@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 same questions same answers, russian faced problems and solved them with the same solutions as americans dis. Yes it's a solution copy, but the two planes don't have much in common
@Graingy ok, would have done the joke anyway. Lucky for you it isn't a joke.
Send me a message on discord so I can provide some screenshots on how to solve the issue.
I just LOVE this airplane, it's really cool to see a good one out here.
I really like it, under 1000 parts but still with great details, the overall shape of the plane is here and the body looks really good, the wings could have had a better airfoil but hey at least it's fuselage wings.
I like the fact that the interiors are simple and without much to do but at least everything works and you did it which is great, I also like the dedication to make the two of them even tho it's a one player game, this kind of motivation is nice to see.
The flight model is way way better than most builds out there, it feels like a real plane, doesn't do to many crazy stuff but still is fun enough.
My only point but I'm being picky is that I'm not sure that the Tornado could super-cruise, maybe I'm wrong tho, same for it pulling 18° of AoA, I don't think it could pull this much.
Overall awesome build.
The Mig 21B actually had "bumps" on the wings where the landing gear retracted, that's why yours couldn't go in all the way. Would have looked more aesthetic and realistic to make these.
@BaconAircraft @MrSilverWolf @Vincent I guess pinging three of you is enough, I should tell you to translate what that chinese guy is saying since it's absolutely disgusting. But the only thing he said in english should actually be enough for him to get banned, anyway thanks in advance for taking care of this.
@PlaneSpike Your answer don't make any sense, I don't understand how any builds could or should go to the front page if upvotes doesn't matter. They don't, don't get me wrong, but the front page as nothing to do with yes or no they're useless.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I don't, I like mobile friendly builds or PEAs, if they are good of course, and I'm not known for making low part count builds. I'm making a mobile-friendly plane right now, kinda what we used to call PEAs at the time, and it ain't difficult, it's fun, challenging in some ways, but not more difficult or asking more effort than a high-end replica build.
@Realturtlecat You're just one of does guys who only build to get upvotes, those are just random internet points and often doesn't mean that your builds are quality, no need to ask for upvotes or why people don't upvote your stuff, if it's good, if people like it, they will upvote without having to ask for it.
@PilotBug I still don't understand the cockpit part, I'm sure you know what you're talking about but it's really confusing from an exterior perspective.
I don't know why it won't be a thing, I'm not a dev, but it won't be a thing. I don't know if it's hard to implement or not since I'm not a dev neither, but there are maybe othe reasons for why they decided to not implement that.
@PilotBug Multiplayer vehicles won't be a thing because the question has already been asked and answered.
I don't really understand the issue with the cockpit thing.
Multiplier vehicles won't be a thing, but I've already discussed some plans with friends to make it possible with magnets and stuff.
Self destructable parts would be nice but it's kinda weird, should we add this option to all parts ? Will it be with an Activation Group ? Will parts like engines just fail or fully brake appart, and what about fuselage parts ?
I feel like it's pretty easy to make cockpits today, it was a pain back when the interior / slicing update wasn't a thing but people already managed to make good interiors and today people really do crazy stuff.
Seeing the trailer for SP2 it seems pretty obvious that the water mechanics will be way better, they showed a boat and a submarine that really looked like builds they made, so I doupt they kept the old water from SP1.
More AI would be great indeed but it's already kinda possible with mods today, so I guess it'll be the same for SP2 if it ain't implemented in-game.
A friendly AI plane would be nice indeed, but will it really be useful in a game where there will be multiplayer ? And will it be possible to spawn AI in multiplayer ?
It's a good idea, I don't know why we can't use weapons and other features while flying with the auto-pilot, it should just try to keep the plane straight.
Yes tank tracks are a need, there's too many tank makers out there to forget them.
Yes it's also a good idea, especially in multiplayer since it would be a pain to respawn every two minutes to re-arm.
I don't know if Jundroo is really willing to make killable players, it's before everything else a building game.
You can pretty much create whatever custom weapon you want today with some skills and time. But I do agree that the system could be simplified.
Third person aiming would be great.
I really do hope that there will be both public and private servers.
@ollielebanania didn't try it out yet but seing the comments it looks like it works, and if it does awesome work ! It was time somebody finally dared to make one.
@rexzion Yeah I have to adjust the fuel consomation of the build (and I think I will have to put more fuel than in the real one, but I'll keep the right amount of fuel mass).
we do speak english (with our really strong french accent tho) so it would be a pleasure to connect in multiplayer and do this kind of stuff, often we do this while trying each others builds, it's more fun than waiting for the other guy to test it then write a fat ass text for feedback.
@DCSplanepro12 It's a friend of mine that made it, gotta ask him if he wants to share it
@DCSplanepro12 oh it's a un-posted build
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 same questions same answers, russian faced problems and solved them with the same solutions as americans dis. Yes it's a solution copy, but the two planes don't have much in common
@Graingy russian copy on the design solutions, some questions have the same answers. But build for an other puropose
@DCSplanepro12 how do you get what ?
If you're talking about upvotes, well I just don't care about them
@Luminaria womp womp yourself 🥴
that's actually pretty cool for ten parts haha
@GuardianAerospace understandable, as long as you enjoy the game :)
You're getting better
Will there be a cockpit interior ? The build doesn't seem that detailed and complicated it shouldn't be hard to cut a cockpit in it.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover generally, leading-edge slats only go down, I also noticed that yours are inverted, the slats should go down when pitching up.
are the slats...going up ???...
@Grob0s0VBRa nope, just some reshade settings
@Graingy ok, would have done the joke anyway. Lucky for you it isn't a joke.
Send me a message on discord so I can provide some screenshots on how to solve the issue.
I do have a fix for this
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 yes you're right
the city in this map has already been used in another SP modded map haha
@winterro damn didn't got it, can't wait to see it
winterro making a plane O_O
@ollielebanania self tag
3.7 year in the making ?? saying that for the cloud ?
@Jacobdaniel Yes, I used discord to host my images on the website but since it's not possible anymore I have to update the page, sorry.
High quality ? Please tag me on these, I'll be a pleasure to test flight your builds
(If possible, tag on both)
Lovely build !
I just LOVE this airplane, it's really cool to see a good one out here.
I really like it, under 1000 parts but still with great details, the overall shape of the plane is here and the body looks really good, the wings could have had a better airfoil but hey at least it's fuselage wings.
I like the fact that the interiors are simple and without much to do but at least everything works and you did it which is great, I also like the dedication to make the two of them even tho it's a one player game, this kind of motivation is nice to see.
The flight model is way way better than most builds out there, it feels like a real plane, doesn't do to many crazy stuff but still is fun enough.
My only point but I'm being picky is that I'm not sure that the Tornado could super-cruise, maybe I'm wrong tho, same for it pulling 18° of AoA, I don't think it could pull this much.
Overall awesome build.
the real game begins !
The Mig 21B actually had "bumps" on the wings where the landing gear retracted, that's why yours couldn't go in all the way. Would have looked more aesthetic and realistic to make these.
Reported him and pinged some moderators, not gonna let a racist slide.
@BaconAircraft @MrSilverWolf @Vincent I guess pinging three of you is enough, I should tell you to translate what that chinese guy is saying since it's absolutely disgusting. But the only thing he said in english should actually be enough for him to get banned, anyway thanks in advance for taking care of this.
do it
@PlaneSpike Your answer don't make any sense, I don't understand how any builds could or should go to the front page if upvotes doesn't matter. They don't, don't get me wrong, but the front page as nothing to do with yes or no they're useless.
@JustAMiko for real haha, that was the good old time.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I don't, I like mobile friendly builds or PEAs, if they are good of course, and I'm not known for making low part count builds. I'm making a mobile-friendly plane right now, kinda what we used to call PEAs at the time, and it ain't difficult, it's fun, challenging in some ways, but not more difficult or asking more effort than a high-end replica build.
congrats dude
Platinium by reposting planes, congrats.
Just kidding, welcome to the club.
congrats
@Realturtlecat You're just one of does guys who only build to get upvotes, those are just random internet points and often doesn't mean that your builds are quality, no need to ask for upvotes or why people don't upvote your stuff, if it's good, if people like it, they will upvote without having to ask for it.
let's turn the question around, why do you think other people get more upvotes ?
@PilotBug I still don't understand the cockpit part, I'm sure you know what you're talking about but it's really confusing from an exterior perspective.
I don't know why it won't be a thing, I'm not a dev, but it won't be a thing. I don't know if it's hard to implement or not since I'm not a dev neither, but there are maybe othe reasons for why they decided to not implement that.
@PilotBug Multiplayer vehicles won't be a thing because the question has already been asked and answered.
I don't really understand the issue with the cockpit thing.
So, my little response to this :
Multiplier vehicles won't be a thing, but I've already discussed some plans with friends to make it possible with magnets and stuff.
Self destructable parts would be nice but it's kinda weird, should we add this option to all parts ? Will it be with an Activation Group ? Will parts like engines just fail or fully brake appart, and what about fuselage parts ?
I feel like it's pretty easy to make cockpits today, it was a pain back when the interior / slicing update wasn't a thing but people already managed to make good interiors and today people really do crazy stuff.
Seeing the trailer for SP2 it seems pretty obvious that the water mechanics will be way better, they showed a boat and a submarine that really looked like builds they made, so I doupt they kept the old water from SP1.
More AI would be great indeed but it's already kinda possible with mods today, so I guess it'll be the same for SP2 if it ain't implemented in-game.
A friendly AI plane would be nice indeed, but will it really be useful in a game where there will be multiplayer ? And will it be possible to spawn AI in multiplayer ?
It's a good idea, I don't know why we can't use weapons and other features while flying with the auto-pilot, it should just try to keep the plane straight.
Yes tank tracks are a need, there's too many tank makers out there to forget them.
Yes it's also a good idea, especially in multiplayer since it would be a pain to respawn every two minutes to re-arm.
I don't know if Jundroo is really willing to make killable players, it's before everything else a building game.
You can pretty much create whatever custom weapon you want today with some skills and time. But I do agree that the system could be simplified.
Third person aiming would be great.
I really do hope that there will be both public and private servers.
@ollielebanania didn't try it out yet but seing the comments it looks like it works, and if it does awesome work ! It was time somebody finally dared to make one.
@Rb2h no need to fix it, it works
Reshade and skills 😤😤
@WisconsinStatePolice F-5 mentionned and I love that
@rexzion Yeah I have to adjust the fuel consomation of the build (and I think I will have to put more fuel than in the real one, but I'll keep the right amount of fuel mass).
we do speak english (with our really strong french accent tho) so it would be a pleasure to connect in multiplayer and do this kind of stuff, often we do this while trying each others builds, it's more fun than waiting for the other guy to test it then write a fat ass text for feedback.
To think that you made this shape on mobile is impressive.
@windshifter1 thanks for the tag. will test the creation later I have some work. nice screenshots tho.
@CaptainBrayden would have said the same thing
@CaptainNoble for real, but it was a lot of fun playing with you