@Randomplayer
honestly, just make good stuff.
people tend to like it alot when you make realistic things, replicas that looks like the actual thing, or vr stuff that looks genuine (in other words just put a bunch of features in)
one thing missing imo is arresting wire and catapult stock parts
is it wrong to be able to land and takeoff (catobar ops) on your own carrier without funky magnet magic?
I found one source, saying that the RD-133 has a power of:
5040kgf dry (11,100lbf);
8300kgf afterburner (18,290lbf)
Idk if this is true or not, but it is close enough to the normal RD-33 engine power output so maybe it is
I'll give credits where it's due because it looks good, but I have several things I will say about it, to keep you in mind whenever you want to remake it:
first one that caught my eye was the vertical stabilizer, the trailing edge sweep of the vertical stabilizer is too much, as in reality it's like, 10°, Idk, I don't want to measure it
2nd, again, but this time it's with the main wing, afaIk, the trailing edge on the main wing doesn't have that much sweep
3rd, gun placement is much closer towards the root of the extension, as where you place it, it's supposed to house some avionics
4th, countermeasure placement depends on variants, since I'm assuming this is the 9.13 variant of the MiG-29 (the likes of A, S, SMT), the countermeasure placement is along the base of the vertical stabilizer
if you need references on these, I'll give you some, but looking at google images also work
@SuperSuperTheSylph
the F110 is stronger, though only very slightly
also the specific thrust you put on the desc is the thrust output of an F100-PW-229 so yeag
just an fyi, the Block 15 above has a taper on their wings, they don't cut off like that.
oh and, is this the Blk70 or Blk72? they're both different because they have different engines
the 70 has the F110-GE-129, while the 72 has the F100-PW-229.
I hope you did actually pay attention to the engine details and uprate the engine because the F-16A uses the F100-PW-200 (I haven't tried it)
nvm I'm just blind
I can't unsee the fact that it is a m2k
just l o n g and intake is square
yeah this is the same exact comment I made on the teaser post xd
welcome back btw
go to xml, add the property bulletScale in the Gun section and put in the value 0,0,0
if you still wanna be able to see just a little bit, putting 0.1,0.1,0.1 works
The missile might know where it is, and know where it isn't. But in some cases, the missile might not know where it is or where it isn't. When the guidance subsystem has acquired the position of where the missile is, and where it isn't, the missile might be able to know where it should be through mathematical computation. In cases where the missile knows where it isn't and where it is, it should be able to reach it's position that it should be by comparing where it is to where it isn't. But in some cases, these missiles might not know where they should be.
In the case when a missile knows where it should be, and begins to generate corrective commands to arrive in the position where it should be, the pilot could deploy several methods to confuse the missile from knowing where it is and where it isn't. When the position where it should be is blocked by a cloud of systems, or by an obstacle in it's path, the missile loses sight on where it isn't, and thus loses a reason to arrive at the point where it should be. Which is called defeating a missile.
@Randomplayer
+1honestly, just make good stuff.
people tend to like it alot when you make realistic things, replicas that looks like the actual thing, or vr stuff that looks genuine (in other words just put a bunch of features in)
unironically great design
+1Idk why lmfao
the words "cool maneuverability" is a bit concerning when you consider the fact that it's still a 104 xd
+1one thing missing imo is arresting wire and catapult stock parts
+1is it wrong to be able to land and takeoff (catobar ops) on your own carrier without funky magnet magic?
yoo holy shit I just remembered this
+1@Rb2h
+1don't need to
just move the files on.
zoltraak.
+1@LunarEclipseSP
+1I believe so when I first made it.
this is great
+1my only suggestion is move the main wing a bit backward, but other than that, this is ballin
I found one source, saying that the RD-133 has a power of:
+15040kgf dry (11,100lbf);
8300kgf afterburner (18,290lbf)
Idk if this is true or not, but it is close enough to the normal RD-33 engine power output so maybe it is
not bad.
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1damn right you are.
this makes me want to do a j20
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1oh aight
add one to the list.
the similarities are too uncanny
+1dudeduwdudedudedudedudeduduw
+1DREU
wuuuuuuuuuUUUUEEEEEEEEEEW-
I'll give credits where it's due because it looks good, but I have several things I will say about it, to keep you in mind whenever you want to remake it:
+1if you need references on these, I'll give you some, but looking at google images also work
how would you like it if I try to become an inspector for PEA (I most likely will be merciless, or not, Idk)
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1yeg
@ComradeSandman
+1I'll show it later then.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1what even was your dc user
since when...
+1huh.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1ooh, interesting, thanks for the notif!
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1the F110 is stronger, though only very slightly
also the specific thrust you put on the desc is the thrust output of an F100-PW-229 so yeag
just an fyi, the Block 15 above has a taper on their wings, they don't cut off like that.
+1oh and, is this the Blk70 or Blk72? they're both different because they have different engines
the 70 has the F110-GE-129, while the 72 has the F100-PW-229.
I hope you did actually pay attention to the engine details and uprate the engine because the F-16A uses the F100-PW-200 (I haven't tried it)
nvm I'm just blind
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1yeah, go on ahead
as long as you credit it
@ReinMcDeer
+1ahh figured, there's really no way to simplify that without it looking a little too odd Ig
I can't unsee the fact that it is a m2k
+1just l o n g and intake is square
yeah this is the same exact comment I made on the teaser post xd
welcome back btw
there's a high likelihood that multiple people out there is exactly as old as your account
+1ever thought of that before? you probably have. Idk
go to xml, add the property
+1bulletScalein theGunsection and put in the value0,0,0if you still wanna be able to see just a little bit, putting
0.1,0.1,0.1worksbobmcat
+1@IQinventory
+1I'm pretty sure it does
@SkyJayTheFirst
+1Idk
if this is a battle of pride I'm not gonna get in the ring
@MrOofington
+1that's called stealing so yes I do mind
@LunarEclipseSP
+1tfx...
DON'T CALL HER THA-
@SPAirForce
+1@Noob101
+1@PrussianAirlines
@MAPA
+1@Rb2h
@TheMouse
@Speedhunter
+1@DatFiat126Fan19
@Foxhound26
@Monarchii
+1ah damn.
am sped
+1this was different than I imagined.
+1(I made the su27 already)
you could've done better with mine, tbh
+1also vero's was actually kinda solid.
I mean glock's a glock.
+1The missile might know where it is, and know where it isn't. But in some cases, the missile might not know where it is or where it isn't. When the guidance subsystem has acquired the position of where the missile is, and where it isn't, the missile might be able to know where it should be through mathematical computation. In cases where the missile knows where it isn't and where it is, it should be able to reach it's position that it should be by comparing where it is to where it isn't. But in some cases, these missiles might not know where they should be.
In the case when a missile knows where it should be, and begins to generate corrective commands to arrive in the position where it should be, the pilot could deploy several methods to confuse the missile from knowing where it is and where it isn't. When the position where it should be is blocked by a cloud of systems, or by an obstacle in it's path, the missile loses sight on where it isn't, and thus loses a reason to arrive at the point where it should be. Which is called defeating a missile.
+1there is a reason I'm trying to update the PEAs.
+1you'll see.
@Monarchii
+1I have nothing to say tbh, just
damn.
@Emma159
+1ty :)
@Emma159 @Apollo018362
+1Can you two please remove your upvotes? I want this thing to be at 31 upvotes permanent
muh gahd
+1finally an aircraft I can bully with the f22 :>>>>