I can see how one could get the chase view locking circle(just put a camera some distance behind the aircraft), but how'd you get that inner circle, & it's ability to track targets?
@Droidy247
I may be able to help. For the entire time of the war, I've been developing a new kind of war machine. They currently have to armament of tanks, but a new pulse of development is about to begin, with far more powerful results. I may be willing to help, should you ask.
I wouldn't care about upvotes too much if it didn't give off the impression that I'm being completely ignored. What, do my builds, with I put a considerable amount of effort into having accurate appearance, and as stable as possible performance, not meet everyone else's standards? Is it because I don't use a pc and make things with hundreds of parts, and have picture perfect screenshots of said builds? I'm not asking to be platinum overnight, hell no, but I at least want recognition for the work I do. I'm not making sh•t with wings then trying to pass it off as a masterpiece. I try to make things that people will have fun with, and then i see that as it would seem, No one gives a rat's ass about my work. Is it so much to ask to have your work recognized??
Yeah, the site really needs some funky tree and variable tutorials, I only started using the variable system recently because this user made a explanation built for their tank.
@UnitedinOne90
Fear not, oh United One, for I already have a group of bomber aircraft heading for snowstone to blast reformist garbage into oblivion. We can add this to the list of targets if you so wish. :)
@AeroTactical @Monarchii
Being a little more serious now, I think this could easily still fit into the pre-war story. A lot of the major wars in history have jad some kind of "incident" that kicked everything off. With a little reworking into the main story, this could easily be a event that caused all out war to happen. Just my thoughts on the whole thing.
Hell, I've got a whole list of all Skypark military stuff, uploaded and not uploaded, available right on my profile(trust me on this one, it's a really big list).
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
Speaking of realistic damage models, This is a model I regularly use for tanks(including the ones for this challenge). Just thought I'd bring it up in case you want to use it too.
It's funny, everyone is just beginning to build stuff for the Monarchii War II, and I've got half of my whole new invasion fleet completed(I don't mean it in a rude way).
For making modern warships, I personally reference things like the Zumwalt destroyer, the Sea Shadow, and various concept art of future military projects from both the past and present.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
Consider Skypark supporting the Loyalists. Monarchii was always the ally of Skypark, so we'll want the original government back.
An option to disable multiplayer. I am not thrilled about the idea of multiplayer, actually. Better graphics, bigger map, some fixes, maybe a new part or two, but not multiplayer.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
If I remember correctly, this type of weapon was conceptualized as a method of taking advantage of a loophole in the treaty that demilitarized space.
@YarisSedan
I hope is this still somewhat enjoyable, even if in an incomplete state. Also, feel free to take this as a lesson to not let projects go so long without being completed you kinda forgot everything you had in mind.
It's have a good few thoughts on SP2, in fact, it'd be way too much for merely a comment. But I can say for certain: I am NOT thrilled about the multiplayer thing at all.
Me announcing that my Siren War entry would be here "soon", then taking nearly a f*cking month, should be here, because in my opinion, it's utterly ridiculous (in a bad way). 😒
I can see how one could get the chase view locking circle(just put a camera some distance behind the aircraft), but how'd you get that inner circle, & it's ability to track targets?
+2yes
+2YES.
Mobile friendly tanks with 'working' tracks, at long last.👍👍
@Quartz05
+2@WolfHunter9111
+2Based on the fact that this person was able to give that...thing wheels, they must actually have to required mod, somehow.
@Droidy247
+2I may be able to help. For the entire time of the war, I've been developing a new kind of war machine. They currently have to armament of tanks, but a new pulse of development is about to begin, with far more powerful results. I may be willing to help, should you ask.
I wouldn't care about upvotes too much if it didn't give off the impression that I'm being completely ignored. What, do my builds, with I put a considerable amount of effort into having accurate appearance, and as stable as possible performance, not meet everyone else's standards? Is it because I don't use a pc and make things with hundreds of parts, and have picture perfect screenshots of said builds? I'm not asking to be platinum overnight, hell no, but I at least want recognition for the work I do. I'm not making sh•t with wings then trying to pass it off as a masterpiece. I try to make things that people will have fun with, and then i see that as it would seem, No one gives a rat's ass about my work. Is it so much to ask to have your work recognized??
+2@ollielebananiaCFSP
+2Yeah, I see A LOT of stuff here with something on the lines of that message.
I've tried making gundams before, but they didn't go so well.
+2@Eugene14
+2Mostly that was a joke, but seriously, what to you think about using a black star as the symbol to put on builds?
Yeah, the site really needs some funky tree and variable tutorials, I only started using the variable system recently because this user made a explanation built for their tank.
+2This should be very helpful. 👍
+2@Dracul0Anderson
+2Excuse my language, but that sneaky bastard of a attribute only appears if the wheel is linked to an engine.
@BlackThuNDR I bet you've seen a eggplane, and I bet you've seen a eggship, but have you seen an eggcopter?
+2@Boeing727200F
+1It's not a reformist aircraft. Definitely an enemy, but not reformist. And it's only the beginning.
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore
+1If that's referring to the plane at the end, no, it's not. It's also not an ally.
@UnitedinOne90
+1Fear not, oh United One, for I already have a group of bomber aircraft heading for snowstone to blast reformist garbage into oblivion. We can add this to the list of targets if you so wish. :)
@griges
+1I've already tried
Pitch!=0? PID(-1000*Pitch,rate(Altitude*3.2808)*60,1,0,0)/1000 : 0, works like a charm. I think this has solved my issue.@RB107
+1I like the idea of making the reformists strong. It makes the story more interesting.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1See my first comment for a mobile friendly way of disabling the turrets.
@AeroTactical @Monarchii
+1Being a little more serious now, I think this could easily still fit into the pre-war story. A lot of the major wars in history have jad some kind of "incident" that kicked everything off. With a little reworking into the main story, this could easily be a event that caused all out war to happen. Just my thoughts on the whole thing.
@JSTQ
+1[Me, the Loyalist]: Too late, bub.
Hell, I've got a whole list of all Skypark military stuff, uploaded and not uploaded, available right on my profile(trust me on this one, it's a really big list).
+1Interesting, the destroyer leader concept hasn't been around in quite some time.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1Speaking of realistic damage models, This is a model I regularly use for tanks(including the ones for this challenge). Just thought I'd bring it up in case you want to use it too.
It's funny, everyone is just beginning to build stuff for the Monarchii War II, and I've got half of my whole new invasion fleet completed(I don't mean it in a rude way).
+1@Boeing727200F
+1Never even heard of that one.
For making modern warships, I personally reference things like the Zumwalt destroyer, the Sea Shadow, and various concept art of future military projects from both the past and present.
+1What generation is this? Cause Skypark is currently rolling out sixth gen aircraft, and I'm not sure anyone else is.
+1Very interesting. I've been wanting to do something similar with Skypark.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1Consider Skypark supporting the Loyalists. Monarchii was always the ally of Skypark, so we'll want the original government back.
@LunarEclipseSP
+1If you're curious, I'm going to be updating the whole fleet, to fit that Skypark has evolved technologically.
T
+1@LunarEclipseSP
+1Normal ships are designated as SSW(Skypark Sea-based Warship), and aerial warships are called SAW(Skypark Aerial Warship).
Maybe a relatively normal building doing something completely abnormal(also, I've got two anomalies on the way).
+1I have everything set to high(or high equivalent), safe shadows and image effects, which are on medium and off respectively.
+1@ShinyGemsBro
+1Fascinating...
A dornier do x.
+1An option to disable multiplayer. I am not thrilled about the idea of multiplayer, actually. Better graphics, bigger map, some fixes, maybe a new part or two, but not multiplayer.
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
+1If I remember correctly, this type of weapon was conceptualized as a method of taking advantage of a loophole in the treaty that demilitarized space.
👍👍
+1@YarisSedan
+1I hope is this still somewhat enjoyable, even if in an incomplete state. Also, feel free to take this as a lesson to not let projects go so long without being completed you kinda forgot everything you had in mind.
It's not necessarily a problem if it looks like the older plane.
+1@KPLBall
+1Don't worry, this is purely for the superweapon challenge, not a new addition to my SP country.
Well done, Rb2h.
+1It's have a good few thoughts on SP2, in fact, it'd be way too much for merely a comment. But I can say for certain: I am NOT thrilled about the multiplayer thing at all.
+1Congratulations.
+1It appears to be some kind of Boeing concept. Beyond that, I don't know.
+1YES! Someone else knows about it!
+1Me announcing that my Siren War entry would be here "soon", then taking nearly a f*cking month, should be here, because in my opinion, it's utterly ridiculous (in a bad way). 😒
+1I've got something in the works, but it's taking is longer then expected.
+1